1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/network/562107 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/network/562107
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..3d2ecacb9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/network/562107
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report about QEMU's GDB stub using IPv6 instead of IPv4. The categories given are things like mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, and others. Let me think through each step.
+
+First, the issue is with the GDB stub in QEMU using IPv6. I know that GDB uses a stub to communicate between the debugger and the program being debugged. If it's using IPv6 when maybe it should be using IPv4 or supporting both, this could cause connectivity issues, especially on systems where IPv6 isn't properly configured or is not preferred.
+
+Looking at the categories, network seems relevant because it's about how QEMU handles networking for GDB. Alternatively, socket might also fit since sockets are involved in network communication. But I think 'network' is a broader category that would encompass this issue, whereas 'socket' is more specific to the programming aspect of handling connections.
+
+The bug report mentions that several people have encountered this problem, and it's an easy fix, probably involving changing or adding IPv4 support in QEMU's GDB stub. This likely falls under network configuration or protocol handling within QEMU.
+
+I don't think it's 'mistranslation' because that would relate to converting source code to IR or target code incorrectly, which doesn't seem to be the case here. Similarly, 'assembly' and 'debug' might not directly apply unless it's about how GDB is implemented in assembly, but that seems off.
+
+So considering all this, 'network' seems like the most appropriate category because it's about network protocol handling between QEMU and the debugger.
+</think>
+
+network
\ No newline at end of file