diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/other/1661')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/other/1661 | 25 |
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/other/1661 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/other/1661 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..76a534ded --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/other/1661 @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The user provided a list including things like mistranslation, assembly lowering, and others. Let's read through the report carefully. + +The report is about x86 CPU support specifically requesting the inclusion of LX Geode CPUs in QEMU. These CPUs are from early OLPC systems and are i686-compatible but lack the 'long-nop' instruction. The user wants to use QEMU for testing compatibility, which implies they're looking to add this CPU type as a target. + +Now, looking at the categories: Mistranslation would be if there's an issue with how instructions are translated from the source to the target architecture. Assembly lowering refers to issues during the process of converting higher-level code to assembly. But here, it's not about fixing bugs but adding new support for a specific CPU. + +The possible categories provided include 'device' and 'cpu'. Since this is about supporting a particular processor in QEMU, which is part of device emulation or handling different CPUs, I think the best fit would be under 'cpu'. + +Wait, but looking back, the user mentioned it's not a bug per se but a feature request to add support. However, since the categories are for bug reports, perhaps the closest category would still relate to CPU handling. Alternatively, if there isn't a specific 'cpu' category in the options provided, I might have to choose from what's available. + +Wait, checking the list again: The possible categories include 'mistranslation', 'assembly lowering', and others like 'device', 'graphic', etc. But wait, 'x86 cpu support request' seems more about adding a new CPU type rather than a bug fix or mistranslation. So maybe it's under 'other' since the exact category isn't listed. + +Wait no, perhaps it's better to think if there's an appropriate category among the ones given. The categories include 'cpu' explicitly? Wait, looking back: No, I see 'x86', but no 'cpu'. Wait, let me check again: + +The possible categories are: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +Hmm. So none of these directly mention CPU support except perhaps 'device' if it's considered a hardware component that QEMU emulates. Alternatively, maybe 'cpu' isn't listed, so I might have to go with the closest fit. Since it's about x86 and adding CPU features, perhaps 'other' is the safest bet, but I'm not entirely sure. + +Alternatively, 'hypervisor' could be a stretch because QEMU can act as a hypervisor when using KVM, but this isn't directly related to that. Maybe 'device' is better since CPUs are emulated devices in QEMU. + +Wait, I think device refers more to hardware like disks, network cards, etc., so maybe not the CPU itself. So perhaps 'other' would be the correct category because it's a feature request for specific CPU support which doesn't fall into any of the listed categories directly. +</think> + +other \ No newline at end of file |