1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/peripherals/1032 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/peripherals/1032
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..65fbf17b7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/peripherals/1032
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report related to QEMU. The user mentioned that there's a slow random performance issue with virtio-blk. Let me break down what I know.
+
+First, virtio is a virtualization technology used in KVM for efficient communication between the guest OS and the host. Virtio devices are designed to be lightweight and paravirtualized, which should provide better performance compared to fully emulated devices.
+
+The bug report involves steps to reproduce where they set up a VM using VirtualBox but then convert it to run under QEMU. They're encountering issues where Windows 11 won't boot properly unless they manually load the viostor driver via recovery mode. After fixing that, when they run CrystalDiskMark, they experience slow and inconsistent performance.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The main issue here is with virtio-blk's performance. Since virtio-blk relates to block I/O and storage devices in virtual machines, it falls under the 'peripherals' category because virtio devices are considered as peripheral interfaces in the virtualized environment. The problem isn't related to translation issues or assembly lowering, but rather hardware device performance within the VM.
+
+So, the appropriate classification is peripherals.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue with slow and inconsistent performance of the virtio-blk device under QEMU. Since this relates directly to the block storage peripheral in a virtualized environment, the category is:
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file