summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2486
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2486')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/248620
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2486 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2486
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..77c7b7c0d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2486
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let me read through the problem description carefully.
+
+The user is reporting an issue with RISC-V in QEMU. They mention that when they set QEMU_CPU=rv64,j=false, it throws an error saying the property isn't found. So, first off, this seems related to CPU configuration in QEMU.
+
+They tried setting f=false and zfinx=true but got a misleading error message about the 'j' extension not being found. The key point here is that specifying certain options doesn't work as expected—it either causes an incorrect error or doesn't apply the settings properly.
+
+Looking at the categories, I see "device", "graphic", "network", etc., but none seem to fit directly. Then there's "boot" which relates to how QEMU starts and configures the machine. Since this is about CPU options not being applied correctly during startup, it might fall under "boot".
+
+Alternatively, considering that the issue arises from command-line arguments affecting the CPU configuration, maybe it's more related to how QEMU handles these parameters. But since booting involves setting up the CPU, I think "boot" is still a reasonable category.
+
+Wait, another thought: the bug is about incorrect behavior when using specific CPU flags. This could also relate to how QEMU processes the CPU models and their features. Maybe it's a configuration issue during runtime rather than at startup. But without more context, it's hard to say.
+
+I'm leaning towards "boot" because it involves setting up the CPU parameters when starting the emulator, leading to an error during that process.
+</think>
+
+The bug report is about incorrect behavior when specifying CPU features, which affects how QEMU configures the virtual CPU during startup. Therefore, it falls under the category where issues related to the configuration and setup of the emulation environment are classified.
+
+**Answer:**
+boot
\ No newline at end of file