diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2558')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2558 | 19 |
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2558 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2558 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ceb106859 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2558 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +<think> +Alright, I'm trying to classify this bug report related to QEMU. The issue is that Ubuntu doesn't boot with EDK2 but works fine with u-boot. Let me break down what's happening here. + +First, the user provided two commands. In the first one, they're using `edk2-riscv-code.fd` as a pflash drive alongside the Ubuntu image. But the system hangs during the UEFI setup. The second command uses `uboot.elf` as the kernel and boots successfully. + +Looking at the categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The problem occurs during the boot process when using EDK2. Since it's related to how QEMU handles the boot loader (EDK2 vs u-boot), I think this might be an issue with how QEMU is setting up the firmware or booting the OS. + +EDK2 is a UEFI implementation, and if it's not working correctly, perhaps there's a problem in QEMU's handling of the firmware or initialization process for RISC-V. The fact that u-boot works suggests that the hardware setup (like devices) is correct when using u-boot but fails with EDK2. + +Looking at the categories, 'boot' seems relevant because it's about the booting process failing. Alternatively, 'hypervisor' could be a category if QEMU as a hypervisor isn't correctly initializing the firmware environment for EDK2. But since the issue is more specific to the boot loader and UEFI setup, 'boot' might be more appropriate. + +Another angle: if it's an assembly lowering issue or mistranslation, that would relate more to how code is translated from RISC-V to another format within QEMU. But here, the problem is with loading the firmware image, not with instruction translation. + +So I think the most fitting category is 'boot' because it's directly related to the boot process failing when using EDK2. +</think> + +boot \ No newline at end of file |