1 files changed, 48 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/device/1839807 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/device/1839807
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..631e5a49c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/device/1839807
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the report carefully.
+
+The user is having trouble with snapshots on a Sabrelite IMX.6 board. They can take the snapshot successfully, but when they try to load it, the machine freezes. This only happens with that specific board. They've tested it on other setups like 32bit ARM Virt and Versatilepb, and it works fine there.
+
+Looking at their environment: Ubuntu 18.04, QEMU versions 3.0.1 and 4.0.0 both have the issue. The kernel is 5.1.14 from kernel.org. They built an SD card image using buildroot with imx_v6_v7_defconfig.
+
+The steps they took were converting the raw image to qcow2, starting QEMU with specific parameters including a network setup, running some background tasks, saving the snapshot, then trying to load it and failing. The machine freezes, CPU usage spikes, but when restarting QEMU, the files are as expected after restore except for processes.
+
+The user mentioned that this is a known QEMU bug according to a mailing list link they provided.
+
+Now, looking at the categories: Mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is with snapshots freezing the guest. Snapshots in QEMU are part of the save/restore functionality, which involves a lot of low-level operations including device states, memory, and possibly how the machine state is being saved and restored.
+
+The problem occurs only with this specific board, so it's likely related to how that particular hardware configuration is handled during snapshots. Since they're using KVM (as indicated by their QEMU command line), which is part of the hypervisor component, but also involves device emulation.
+
+Looking into possible causes: The snapshot might not be correctly restoring all the necessary states for the devices attached to the machine. If the device tree or hardware state isn't properly restored, the guest could freeze.
+
+Alternatively, it might be an issue with how QEMU handles the specific board's configuration during the load phase. Maybe some part of the device initialization isn't happening correctly after the snapshot is loaded.
+
+Another angle: The user mentioned that after exiting QEMU and restarting, the files are there but processes aren't. This suggests that while the disk state was restored, the process information wasn't, which could be a problem in how the snapshot handles the guest's memory and running tasks.
+
+Now, considering the categories:
+
+- Device: Since it's specific to a particular board, maybe the issue lies within device handling during snapshots.
+- Kernel: Maybe QEMU isn't correctly restoring the kernel state for that board.
+- Hypervisor: As KVM is involved, perhaps the hypervisor isn't properly resuming the VM after snapshot load.
+
+But looking at the categories given, "device" seems to fit as it's related to hardware configuration. Alternatively, if it's about how QEMU manages the machine's state, maybe it's under "other." However, since the problem is tied to a specific device (Sabrelite IMX.6), "device" might be more accurate.
+
+Wait, but considering that the issue occurs when loading the snapshot and relates to the entire system state, including processes which are managed by the kernel, perhaps it's related to how QEMU interacts with the kernel during restore. But I'm not sure if that falls under "kernel."
+
+Alternatively, if the problem is due to incorrect mapping from the source architecture (like ARM) to IR/target in user-mode when restoring, that would be "mistranslation." However, the issue seems more about device state restoration rather than semantic mapping during execution.
+
+So between "device" and "other," I think "device" makes more sense because it's hardware-specific. But if it's a broader issue with how QEMU handles snapshots for certain configurations, maybe it's under "other."
+
+Wait, but the user mentioned that the problem is known from the mailing list, which points towards it being a QEMU bug related to snapshot handling for this specific board. Since it's about restoring the machine state and devices correctly, I think "device" might be appropriate.
+
+But considering that snapshots involve more than just device states—like CPU state, memory, etc.—it could also fall under other categories like "mistranslation." However, since the user is using KVM and the issue occurs when loading, it's more about the machine's state restoration which includes devices.
+
+I'm still a bit unsure. Maybe I should consider that if it's related to the way QEMU saves and restores the device tree or hardware configuration specifically for this board, then "device" would be correct.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves issues with snapshots freezing the Sabrelite IMX.6 board when using QEMU. The problem is specific to restoring the snapshot, where the guest system freezes, suggesting an issue with how the machine's state is restored. This likely relates to device-specific configuration or hardware state during the snapshot load process.
+
+**Answer:**
+device
\ No newline at end of file