diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/513')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/513 | 19 |
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/513 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/513 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d4b3525d5 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/513 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +<think> +Okay, I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report about QEMU failing when using -pflash with UEFI firmware. Let's break it down. + +First, the bug report mentions "Qemu/WHPX". WHPX is a hypervisor component of QEMU that provides hardware-assisted virtualization support on Windows hosts. So the issue relates to how QEMU handles something under WHPX. + +The problem occurs when applying UEFI firmware with the "-pflash" option. PFlash stands for "PXE Flash," which in this context refers to using a persistent flash device image, often used for UEFI booting. The failure suggests that there's an issue when trying to load or apply the UEFI firmware via pflash. + +Now, looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, and others are more related to code generation or user-mode issues. Device might relate if it's a hardware device problem, but this seems more about how QEMU is handling the firmware image. + +Graphic could be relevant if it's a display issue, but again, not directly here. Socket or network issues don't seem applicable. KVM is another hypervisor but in a different context. Booting issues might fit, as UEFI is related to the boot process. + +VNC and debug are more about remote access and debugging tools. Files, permissions, performance: these could be factors, but not directly pinpointing the issue type. Kernel, peripherals—maybe, but I'm thinking it's more specific to how QEMU handles the firmware during boot. + +Hypervisor is another option since WHPX is a hypervisor component. The problem occurs when applying UEFI firmware, which might involve interactions with the hypervisor layer. It could be an issue in how the hypervisor initializes or interacts with the virtual devices during the boot process using pflash. + +So, considering all these points, the failure is related to how QEMU's WHPX handles the application of UEFI firmware through pflash. This seems most closely tied to hypervisor functions since it involves the interaction between the host's hypervisor and the guest's UEFI setup. +</think> + +hypervisor \ No newline at end of file |