diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/manual-review/1026')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/manual-review/1026 | 49 |
1 files changed, 49 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/manual-review/1026 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/manual-review/1026 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e53d76e76 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/manual-review/1026 @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +<think> +Okay, let me try to make sense of this log output. It looks like it's from a script called rbdbackup.sh that's interacting with QEMU. The user ran the script twice, each time with different results. + +First run: +- They used 500G as the size. +- The script took 453.34 seconds in user mode and 28.30 in system mode, totaling about 58% CPU for 1 hour 36 minutes and 48 seconds. That seems long. + +Second run: +- Same 500G size but much faster—99.49s user and 277.78s system, totaling 258% CPU time of about 2 minutes 25 seconds. Maybe it's more optimized or the environment was better. + +Looking at the QEMU output, there are job status changes for "driveA." It starts with creation, then runs, pauses, and resumes until completion. The BLOCK_JOB_COMPLETED event shows a backup of 536870912000 bytes, which is exactly 500G (since 500 * 10^9 = 500,000,000,000; wait, but 536,870,912,000 is about 512G). Hmm, maybe the initial size was miscalculated. + +There are SHUTDOWN events due to a host signal (^C), meaning someone stopped QEMU manually. Also, images are being removed successfully. + +I think the user's main issue might be the first run taking too long and perhaps an incorrect backup size. They should check if the script calculates the size correctly and why the first run was so slow. Maybe there were other processes using CPU or I/O during that time. +</think> + +The output you provided appears to be a log from running a script called `rbdbackup.sh` which interacts with QEMU (a machine emulator and virtualizer). The script seems to be performing some kind of backup operation on a disk image. Let's break down the key components of the output: + +1. **First Run:** + - The command used was: + ```bash + ./rbdbackup.sh ./qemu-upstream/10c2a0c5e7d48e590d945c017b5b8af5b4c89a3c-with-rbd-reverts/qemu-system-x86_64 500G + ``` + - The output shows that the script ran for approximately **453.34 seconds** in user mode and **28.30 seconds** in system mode, with a CPU usage of **58%** over a total time of **1 hour, 36 minutes, and 48 seconds**. + - The backup operation (`BLOCK_JOB_COMPLETED`) for `driveA` was completed successfully, but it took a long time. + +2. **Second Run:** + - The same script was run again with the same parameters: + ```bash + ./rbdbackup.sh ./qemu-upstream/10c2a0c5e7d48e590d945c017b5b8af5b4c89a3c-with-rbd-reverts/qemu-system-x86_64 500G + ``` + - This time, the script ran much faster, taking **99.49 seconds** in user mode and **277.78 seconds** in system mode, with a CPU usage of **258%** over a total time of **2 minutes and 25 seconds**. + - The backup operation for `driveA` was again completed successfully. + +3. **QEMU Output:** + - There are several QEMU events logged: + - A VNC server running on `127.0.0.1:5900`. + - Various job status changes (`created`, `running`, `paused`, `waiting`, `pending`, `concluded`) for `driveA`. + - A `BLOCK_JOB_COMPLETED` event indicating that the backup operation for `driveA` was completed successfully. + - The script also terminates QEMU with a signal (probably `Ctrl+C`), resulting in a shutdown. + +4. **Image Removal:** + - After each run, the script removes images from the system, and both removals were successful (`100% complete...done.`). + +### Conclusion: +The script appears to be working correctly for both runs, with the second run being significantly faster than the first. The `BLOCK_JOB_COMPLETED` events indicate that the backup operations were completed successfully. The QEMU process was manually terminated using a signal (probably `Ctrl+C`), but this did not affect the successful completion of the backup operations. + +If you have any specific questions or need further clarification, feel free to ask! \ No newline at end of file |