1 files changed, 59 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/manual-review/2194 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/manual-review/2194
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..d7e81ff01
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/manual-review/2194
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to help someone who's having an issue with QEMU where the process is using 100% CPU after booting a kernel. They provided some log output from QEMU and mentioned that they've tried running it with `-smp 1` but still have the same problem.
+
+First, I'll look at the logs to see what's happening during the boot. The logs start with "Fallback order for Node 0: 0" which seems normal. Then there are some memory-related messages about zone lists and policies, which also seem standard for a kernel initialization.
+
+The kernel command line parameters include `nokaslr`, which is flagged as unknown but will be passed to user space. That's not immediately concerning unless it's causing issues in the init process later on.
+
+Looking at the memory allocation lines, there's mention of stack and heap settings, which might relate to memory management problems. The available memory seems okay, with 2183328K out of 6275072K available, but I'm not sure if that's a problem or just informational.
+
+The SLUB allocator messages indicate it's working as expected on 4 CPUs and 1 node. Ftrace is being allocated and seems fine, though maybe the number of entries could be an issue if there's heavy tracing happening.
+
+RCU (Read-Copy-Update) messages show that it's being initialized with preemptible settings. The number of CPUs is restricted to 4 from a total of 16, which might be because the guest OS doesn't support more than 4 CPUs or is configured for fewer. This could be related to the high CPU usage if RCU tasks are not handling preemption efficiently.
+
+IRQs and ISA bridge information seem normal; no obvious issues there. Clocksource and scheduler messages look standard as well, with a 32-bit clock and scheduler settings.
+
+The console initialization messages indicate that the early console is disabled after booting, which might be part of the normal process.
+
+Now, considering that QEMU uses 100% CPU, this suggests that the guest kernel might not be yielding properly or there's an infinite loop in the code. Since they tried `-smp 1` and still have the issue, it's likely a problem with how the kernel is handling even one CPU core.
+
+Possible causes could include:
+
+1. **Kernel Hang**: The kernel might be stuck in a loop or waiting indefinitely on some condition.
+2. **Noisy CPUs**: If the system doesn't support proper preemption, all CPU time is taken by the current task, causing 100% usage.
+3. **RCU Issues**: Since RCU is involved, improper handling of callbacks or grace periods could block all CPUs.
+4. **IRQ Flood**: High-frequency interrupts that aren't being handled correctly might monopolize the CPU.
+
+To troubleshoot:
+
+- They should check if the kernel has a printk or a message about what's happening right before it stops responding. If they can capture more logs, that would help pinpoint where it's getting stuck.
+- Running QEMU with `-trace` options or enabling debug output might reveal more details about where execution is halting.
+- Increasing the verbosity of the boot process could also provide more clues by printing out each step as it occurs.
+
+If the issue persists, compiling and running a debug version of the kernel with additional logging enabled might be necessary. Alternatively, they can add print statements in suspected areas to see which part of the code is being executed last before the CPU usage spikes.
+
+In summary, the logs don't show an obvious failure point, so further investigation into what happens after the initial boot messages is needed. Capturing more detailed logs or using debugging tools would be the next steps to identify the root cause.
+</think>
+
+The problem occurs because the QEMU process is stuck in a loop or infinite task without yielding CPU time, causing it to consume 100% of the host's CPU resources. This could be due to a kernel issue with preemption, RCU handling, or another subsystem that doesn't release CPU control.
+
+**Step-by-Step Explanation:**
+
+1. **Identify Symptoms**: The QEMU process uses 100% CPU after booting the kernel, indicating no task is yielding.
+2. **Examine Logs**: The logs show successful kernel initialization up to console setup but stop there, suggesting a hang post-boot.
+3. **Check Kernel Parameters**: `nokaslr` might affect ASLR, possibly leading to issues if security features are misconfigured.
+4. **Consider Scheduling Issues**: With RCU involved, improper handling could block all CPUs.
+5. **Troubleshooting Steps**:
+   - Enable debug output in QEMU for more detailed logs.
+   - Check kernel configuration for proper preemption and CPU affinity settings.
+   - Use tools like `strace` or `gdb` to inspect the running QEMU process for blocked operations.
+6. **Compile Debug Kernel**: Build a debug version with additional logging to capture where execution halts.
+
+**Solution:**
+
+- Capture detailed logs of the boot process before the hang occurs.
+- Run QEMU with increased verbosity and trace options.
+- Analyze the kernel source for potential infinite loops or missed preemption points.
+- Test with different CPU configurations (e.g., enabling more CPUs) to see if it affects the outcome.
+
+By systematically gathering more information and testing different configurations, you can identify the exact cause of the high CPU usage and resolve the issue.
\ No newline at end of file