diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/836')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/836 | 21 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/836 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/836 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..6190b9e68 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/836 @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +<think> +Alright, so I've got this bug report for QEMU related to the lseek() system call returning -14 (EFAULT). Let's break it down step by step. + +First, looking at the description, the user says that when they call lseek(), it returns EFAULT even though the file descriptor is correct. According to the man page, this shouldn't happen. So, something's wrong with how lseek() is being handled in QEMU for RISC-V32. + +The provided code is an assembly test case. They're using ecall to make system calls. The steps are: open a file with SYS_OPENAT (which works), then call lseek(), which fails with -14, and finally close the file. The exit status shows 14, which matches EFAULT. + +I need to figure out which category this falls into from the given options. The possible categories include things like mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, network, etc. + +Mistranslation refers to incorrect mapping from source architecture to IR or target. Since this is about system calls in user-mode (as it's a syscall), and QEMU handles these via translation, I suspect mistranslation might be the cause. Maybe the RISC-V32 lseek() syscall isn't being translated correctly. + +Assembly lowering is about converting higher-level operations into assembly, but here the issue seems more with how the syscall is handled rather than the code generation itself. + +Other categories like device, network, or hypervisor don't seem to fit because this is specifically a filesystem operation (lseek) in user-mode. It's not related to hardware devices, networking, or the hypervisor layer; it's about the syscall handling. + +So, putting it together, the issue is likely due to incorrect translation of the lseek() system call in QEMU for RISC-V32. Therefore, the category should be 'mistranslation'. +</think> + +The bug report describes an issue where the lseek() system call returns EFAULT (-14) even when the file descriptor is correct. This points to a problem in how the syscall is handled during translation, likely within QEMU's emulation of RISC-V32 syscalls. + +**Answer:** mistranslation \ No newline at end of file |