diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/other/1707297')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/other/1707297 | 25 |
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/other/1707297 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/other/1707297 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..3161eb9a3 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/other/1707297 @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +<think> +Alright, let's figure out the category for this bug report. The user is having trouble with QEMU when specifying memory using "-m 1.00000GiB". They noticed that in version 2.9.0-3.fc26.x86_64, it no longer accepts this format, whereas it worked fine in 2.7.1-7.fc25.x86_64. + +First, the error message mentions that the parameter 'size' expects a non-negative number below 2^64 and lists allowed suffixes (k, M, G, etc.). This suggests there's an issue with how QEMU is parsing the memory option. + +Looking at possible categories: It's not related to device, graphic, socket, or network issues. The problem isn't about performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, vnc, debug, files, permissions, or mistranslation either. + +The key here is that it's a parsing issue with the "-m" option, which deals with memory configuration. Since this falls under how QEMU processes command-line options and memory specifications, it likely relates to the assembly lowering part of the code, particularly in how arguments are parsed and converted into appropriate values within the system. + +So, the category that best fits is 'assembly' because it's about correctly interpreting user input (the '-m' option) and converting it into the right internal representation. Alternatively, if there's a specific parser function involved in handling command-line options, it might fall under a different category like 'other', but given the options, 'assembly' seems closer to the parsing of parameters. + +Wait, perhaps I'm overcomplicating it. The issue is with how QEMU parses the memory option. It could also be a bug in argument processing or validation logic, which isn't directly tied to assembly lowering but more to how command-line arguments are handled. However, among the given categories, 'mistranslation' refers to incorrect semantic mapping from source architecture to IR/target, which doesn't quite fit here. + +Alternatively, maybe it's an issue with how the option is processed in the user-mode or target machine's memory setup. But I'm not sure if that aligns perfectly with any category. + +Wait, perhaps 'other' is the safest bet since the problem isn't explicitly listed under other categories like device, network, etc., but more about parsing a specific command-line parameter. Alternatively, if it's related to how the option is translated or parsed, maybe 'mistranslation', but I'm not certain. + +I think the correct category here might be 'other' because the issue isn't directly tied to any of the other specified categories like device, network, etc., and it's more about parsing a specific command-line argument which doesn't fall neatly into the given options. +</think> + +The bug report is related to how QEMU parses the memory option. The error suggests that the way the "-m" parameter is processed has become stricter in version 2.9.0 compared to 2.7.1. Since this involves parsing and validating user input for command-line options, which isn't directly tied to any of the specified categories like device or network issues, it falls under 'other'. + +**Answer:** + +other \ No newline at end of file |