summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/performance/1820
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/performance/1820')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/performance/182011
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/performance/1820 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/performance/1820
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..16ea7bb12
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/performance/1820
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The report mentions that WHAX is slower than TCG. Let me break down what each part means.
+
+First, the user ran QEMU with the "-accel whpx,kernel-irqchip=off" option. So they're using the WHAX accelerator. They found it much slower than TCG (which stands for Translation-Cache Guest). 
+
+The possible categories include performance. Since the issue is about speed and performance difference between two accelerators, this falls under performance.
+
+Looking at other categories like device, network, etc., none of them fit as well as performance does here.
+</think>
+
+performance
\ No newline at end of file