summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/performance/1913505
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/performance/1913505')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/performance/191350519
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/performance/1913505 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/performance/1913505
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..cd4b69983
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/performance/1913505
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I'm trying to classify this bug report about QEMU where Windows XP is running very slowly on an Apple M1 chip. Let me go through the details step by step.
+
+First, the user mentioned they installed QEMU using Homebrew with the command 'brew install qemu -s'. The version of QEMU is 5.2.0, and they're running a Windows XP image. They're experiencing very slow performance—installation taking days with high CPU usage around 94%. The system isn't frozen but the mouse pointer sometimes changes to an hourglass.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue here is about slow performance. The user didn't mention any specific error related to translation issues or assembly problems. It's more about how the emulator is handling the load on an M1 chip, which might be a performance bottleneck. High CPU usage suggests that QEMU isn't optimizing well on this architecture, possibly due to lack of efficient emulation or driver support for the M1.
+
+I don't see any mentions of device-specific issues, graphics problems, networking slowness, or VNC-related hang-ups. It's more about overall system performance when running Windows XP under QEMU on an Apple Silicon Mac.
+
+So, 'performance' seems to be the most fitting category here because the problem revolves around how efficiently QEMU is handling the workload on this particular hardware.
+</think>
+
+The issue described involves slow performance of Windows XP under QEMU on an M1 chip, characterized by high CPU usage and prolonged installation times. The key factor is the emulator's efficiency on Apple Silicon architecture, which points to a performance-related problem rather than specific errors in translation or other categories.
+
+**Answer:**
+
+performance
\ No newline at end of file