1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2356 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2356
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..3dea97258
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2356
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let's see what the problem is.
+
+The user provided a log that says there was an assertion failure in `stm32l4x5_rcc.c` at line 546. The error message mentions that the value `val` exceeds `0b100`. So, this looks like a hardware-related issue because it's part of the RCC (Reset and Clock Control) module for the STM32L4x5 microcontroller.
+
+Looking at the steps to reproduce, they're using `qemu-system-aarch64` with specific machine options. The command writes 0xffffffff to address 0x40021008. This seems like an attempt to manipulate a hardware register in QEMU's simulation, possibly causing the RCC state to be set incorrectly.
+
+The bug is within the `rcc_update_cfgr_register` function, which suggests it's related to how QEMU handles the configuration of the clock and reset controls for the STM32 device. This falls under the peripherals category because it's dealing with hardware peripheral emulation in QEMU.
+
+I don't think it's a translation issue or assembly lowering, so "mistranslation" or "assembly" are out. It also doesn't seem to be about networking, sockets, VNC, or other common categories like performance or kernel issues. The problem is specific to the RCC hardware peripheral, making "peripherals" the correct category.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves an assertion failure in a function related to the STM32L4x5 microcontroller's Reset and Clock Control (RCC) module. This is part of QEMU's hardware emulation for peripherals.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file