summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1095531
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1095531')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/109553119
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1095531 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1095531
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..eaca7cafe
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1095531
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's try to figure out what category this bug falls into. The user provided some logs and code snippets from QEMU related to SPARC32plus on 64-bit hosts. They mentioned issues with load and store functions causing access violations.
+
+First, looking at the problem description: it seems that when compiling for a 64-bit host, the generated x86 code has incorrect handling of 32-bit operations. Specifically, in both examples provided, there's an instruction "mov %ebx,%ebx" which is redundant and doesn't seem to do anything useful. This might be causing issues because in 64-bit mode, operations that should handle 32-bit data aren't being managed correctly.
+
+The user tried disabling gen_address_mask(), but it made things worse. So the issue isn't just a missing mask; perhaps there's something else wrong with how addresses are calculated or how 32-bit values are extended in 64-bit registers.
+
+Looking at the categories:
+
+- **Instruction**: This would involve an incorrect instruction being generated.
+- **Syscall**: Errors related to system calls.
+- **Runtime**: Other runtime errors that aren't necessarily due to instructions or syscalls.
+
+The problem here doesn't seem to be a specific instruction error, but rather how data is being handled during execution. The redundant "mov" and the way 32-bit values are extended in 64-bit registers might lead to incorrect memory accesses, which would cause runtime errors like access violations.
+
+So it's more about what happens during the execution of the generated code rather than a specific instruction or syscall issue.
+</think>
+
+runtime
\ No newline at end of file