diff options
Diffstat (limited to '')
4 files changed, 80 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1756 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1756 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..2d5f48c19 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1756 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +<think> +Okay, I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report about QEMU. The issue seems to be related to the brk() system call on Linux causing a SIGSEGV error. Let me break it down step by step. + +First, the problem occurs when using qemu8-user on Linux. When brk(NULL) is called, it might return a value that doesn't point to an existing page. QEMU then tries to memset this area, which leads to a segmentation fault because that memory isn't actually there. + +The bug report mentions that the issue arises in the do_brk() function at line 867 of syscall.c. The problematic code is trying to memset from g2h_untagged(target_brk) to brk_page - target_brk. If target_brk points to a non-existent page, this causes a SIGSEGV. + +The user explains that Linux returns a random value for brk(NULL), which can be higher than the current heap but not necessarily valid. They also note that the way Linux computes the maximum brk value is based on the most recent execve(), which might not reflect the actual memory layout due to operations like mmap or munmap, especially in cases like UPX decompression. + +The suggested fix is for QEMU to avoid calling memset unless the first page of the range exists. Alternatively, they mention using prctl(PR_SET_MM_BRK) but note its limitations. + +Looking at the possible categories: instruction, syscall, runtime. The issue isn't about a faulty CPU instruction or an error in handling syscalls per se; it's more about how QEMU handles memory management during runtime, particularly after a system call. So this seems like a runtime error because it occurs while executing code and accessing memory that doesn't exist as expected. + +I think the category should be "runtime" since it's an error happening during program execution due to incorrect assumptions about the memory state returned by brk(). +</think> + +The bug report describes a runtime issue where QEMU assumes contiguous .bss after a brk() call, leading to accessing invalid memory. This causes a SIGSEGV. The problem occurs during execution when attempting to memset non-existent pages. + +runtime \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1756519 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1756519 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a3901a350 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1756519 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +<think> +Alright, I need to classify this bug report into one of three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. + +Looking at the problem description, it involves QEMU crashing while running a test case from the libgomp test suite. The error message mentions issues during QOM path canonicalization in the do_fork() call when creating a CPU. The backtrace points to functions like object_get_canonical_path_component and cpu_create, which are part of QEMU's internal management. + +The crash occurs when handling multi-threaded code, specifically when OMP_NUM_THREADS is set to 5 or more. This suggests it's related to how QEMU handles threading or forking within its environment rather than a problem with an instruction execution or a specific syscall. + +Since the issue arises from object path canonicalization and CPU creation during fork, it doesn't seem to be directly caused by an incorrect instruction or a syscall error. Instead, it's more about runtime management—how QEMU manages objects and threads dynamically. + +Therefore, this bug falls under the "runtime" category. +</think> + +runtime \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1756807 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1756807 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..df31ca6a0 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1756807 @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +<think> +Alright, let's try to figure out what's going on here. The user has reported that running a command inside a chroot using proot and qemu-user is significantly slower on Ubuntu 18.04 compared to 16.04. They've provided logs from both systems showing the time taken for the same operation. + +First, I notice that the real time jumped from about 0.066 seconds to over 24 seconds. That's a massive increase—over 100 times slower. The user mentioned that proot hasn't changed between the two systems but qemu has been updated. So, it's possible that this issue is related to changes in the qemu version. + +Looking at the system specs, System 2 (Ubuntu 18.04) is lower spec than System 1 (16.04), but not by a huge margin. The CPU on System 1 is an i7-6700, which is more powerful than the i5-5300U in System 2, but even so, the performance hit seems too large for that difference alone. + +The user is using proot with qemu-arm-static to run a chroot. The command they're timing is a simple grep inside /usr/share/doc. The fact that this specific command is slow suggests it's something about how the emulation or the filesystem is handled. + +Looking at the logs, in System 1 (Ubuntu 16.04), the user time was 0.040s and sys time 0.008s, which are both very low. In contrast, on System 2, user time is 0.366s and sys time is a whopping 11.352s. The high system time suggests that the kernel is spending a lot of time handling this process, possibly due to increased overhead in the emulation layer. + +The qemu version in System 1 is 2.10.1, while in System 2 it's 2.11.1. I know that between these versions, there were some changes, especially in how qemu handles certain system calls or filesystem operations. It could be a regression introduced in the newer version. + +I should check if others have reported similar issues with qemu-user in Ubuntu 18.04. Maybe looking up bug reports related to performance regressions when using proot and qemu-arm-static would shed some light. If there's an existing issue, it might be that this is a known problem or at least something being looked into. + +Another angle could be filesystem handling. The user mentioned the chroot is just a Debian bootstrap, so maybe the way the files are accessed in the chroot is causing inefficiency. Perhaps newer qemu versions have more strict checks or different caching mechanisms that aren't as efficient as before. + +Also, considering that proot hasn't changed, but the environment has (different kernel, libraries), it might be an interaction between qemu and the host system's components. For example, changes in how syscalls are handled by the kernel could affect performance when using emulated environments. + +The fact that other software isn't affected suggests that the issue is specific to this particular setup—using proot with qemu-user for arm emulation. So it's not a general system slowdown but something particular to these tools working together in this configuration. + +Putting it all together, the bug seems to be related to how the newer version of qemu is handling certain operations when used with proot. The high sys time indicates that the issue occurs during runtime execution—maybe handling syscalls or filesystem operations less efficiently than before. + +Therefore, I would classify this as a runtime error because the problem arises during the execution of the process rather than being an instruction fault or a syscall error per se. +</think> + +runtime \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1756927 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1756927 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..083c5ec7e --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1756927 @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let me read through the problem description again to understand what's going on. + +The issue is about an ARMv7 LPAE (Large Physical Address Extensions) scenario where a 'bkpt' instruction causes a prefetch abort exception. The IFSR (Instruction Fault Status Register) bit [9] isn't set correctly in this case, which should be indicating the use of LPAE. When the test program runs, it outputs "short-descriptor" instead of the expected "long-descriptor". + +The environment includes QEMU with a specific revision and Ubuntu 16.04 LTS with a Linaro cross-compiler. + +So, let's break this down. The 'bkpt' instruction is a software breakpoint used for debugging. When it triggers an exception (prefetch abort in this case), the system should set certain bits in the IFSR to describe the fault. However, bit 9 isn't being set when it should be, indicating that LPAE is active. + +Now, considering the categories: + +- **Instruction**: This would involve issues with how instructions are processed or executed. Since 'bkpt' is an instruction causing the problem, this could fit. +- **Syscall**: Issues related to system calls. Here, the problem isn't directly about syscalls but rather exceptions and registers during a specific instruction execution. +- **Runtime**: Errors that occur during runtime which aren't necessarily tied to a specific instruction or syscall. + +The bug is specifically about how an exception (prefetch abort) caused by a 'bkpt' instruction doesn't correctly set a bit in the IFSR. This seems more related to how exceptions are handled and how registers are updated, rather than a problem with the 'bkpt' instruction itself. So it's more of a runtime issue because it occurs during execution when handling an exception. + +Therefore, the category is likely **runtime**. +</think> + +runtime \ No newline at end of file |