1 files changed, 27 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1777226 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1777226
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..1a451ebbf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1777226
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report about qemu-user emitting warnings that are confusing userland applications. The user provided an example where the configure script for OpenJDK-11 on qemu-sh4 is giving errors because it's interpreting qemu's warning as part of its own output.
+
+First, I'll read through the problem description again. They mention that qemu emits a warning about an unsupported syscall (number 318), which gets picked up by the configure script, causing it to fail. The user suggests that redirecting these warnings away from stdout/stderr would fix the issue.
+
+Now, looking at the possible categories: instruction, syscall, runtime. Let me think about each one.
+
+- **Instruction**: This category is for bugs where a specific instruction is faulty. Here, the problem isn't with an instruction but rather with warning messages being outputted. So probably not this one.
+  
+- **Syscall**: The error in the example is about an unsupported syscall (number 318). That seems relevant because it's related to how qemu handles system calls. But wait, the main issue here is that the warnings are causing problems for applications reading stdout/stderr, not necessarily the handling of the syscall itself.
+
+- **Runtime**: This category covers other runtime errors that don't fit into instruction or syscall. Since the problem occurs during the execution when qemu emits these warnings which interfere with application output, it might fall under runtime issues because it's about how the emulator behaves while running applications.
+
+Wait, but the warning is specifically about a syscall not being supported. So perhaps it's more directly related to handling syscalls in qemu. The user points out that this specific error occurs during a syscall, which suggests that the problem is with how qemu handles certain system calls and then emits warnings that interfere with application output.
+
+But the classification isn't about whether the issue is with a syscall itself but rather what category it falls into based on the given options. The bug report's primary concern is that the warning messages are causing issues, which could be seen as a runtime problem because they affect how applications run under qemu.
+
+Hmm, I'm a bit torn between 'syscall' and 'runtime'. Since the warning is about an unsupported syscall (318), it seems related to syscalls. However, the issue arises from the warnings themselves interfering with application output, which could be considered a runtime behavior of qemu.
+
+Wait, looking back at the possible categories, the instruction category doesn't fit here because we're not dealing with specific CPU instructions but rather system calls and warning messages. So between syscall and runtime.
+
+The problem is that when qemu handles an unsupported syscall, it outputs a warning to stderr or stdout, which affects applications expecting clean output. Therefore, the issue is about how qemu's warnings are handled during runtime, interfering with application output.
+
+So I think 'runtime' would be the appropriate category because it's about how qemu behaves while running applications and emitting warnings that cause issues for those applications.
+</think>
+
+runtime
\ No newline at end of file