diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1812')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1812 | 19 |
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1812 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1812 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..6057ebfa8 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1812 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +<think> +Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let me go through the details step by step. + +The problem is that older aarch64 programs are segfaulting when run under qemu-aarch64 after a specific commit. The user provided steps to reproduce the issue, which involves setting up a chroot environment with an old userspace (Debian jessie or Ubuntu xenial) and then running qemu-aarch64 on /bin/ls inside that chroot. This results in a segmentation fault. + +The user mentions that not all programs fail—dash works, but ls and bash do not. They also note that reverting the mentioned commit fixes the issue. The problem started after commit 59b6b42cd3446862567637f3a7ab31d69c9bef51 in QEMU, which suggests something changed in how QEMU handles these programs. + +Now, considering the categories: + +- **Instruction**: This would involve a specific instruction causing issues. The report doesn't mention any particular instructions failing or disassembler errors, so this seems less likely. + +- **Syscall**: If it were a syscall issue, we might expect problems with system calls between the host and guest. However, dash works, which is a shell that makes many syscalls, but ls doesn't, suggesting it's not a general syscall problem. + +- **Runtime**: This category covers other runtime errors, such as issues during execution like memory management or CPU feature handling. The segfaults suggest something is wrong in the execution environment. Since older userspace might not handle recent CPU features correctly when emulated, this seems to fit. QEMU's changes could be causing compatibility issues with how the old binaries interact with the emulated CPU. + +The problem likely arises from how QEMU is handling certain instructions or features that older binaries aren't prepared for, leading to segfaults during execution. This aligns with a runtime issue rather than a specific instruction or syscall error. +</think> + +runtime \ No newline at end of file |