diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1076445')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1076445 | 19 |
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1076445 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1076445 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..1fb7d1f59 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1076445 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +<think> +Okay, I need to figure out what's going on here. The user provided a bug report about QEMU failing when running a simple C program that uses the system() function. They mentioned it happens with i386 and x86_64 toolchains from Buildroot but works fine with ARM and MIPS. + +First, I'll look at the code they provided. The program is straightforward: it calls system("echo hello") and prints the return value. On x86 targets, QEMU outputs -1, which indicates an error, while on other architectures, it correctly displays "hello" and 0. + +The possible categories are instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let's break this down. + +If it were an instruction issue, there might be a problem with how the program is compiled or specific CPU instructions causing QEMU to fail. But since it works for ARM and MIPS but not x86, that suggests it's more about how system calls are handled rather than specific instructions. + +Next, considering syscalls: the system() function internally uses fork(), execve(), and waitpid(). Maybe one of these syscalls isn't properly emulated in QEMU for x86 targets. I know that different architectures might have variations in how certain syscalls are implemented or called. + +The fact that it works on ARM and MIPS but not x86 points towards an issue with the syscall handling specific to x86 in QEMU. Perhaps there's a missing implementation or incorrect handling of these syscalls in the i386 and x86_64 targets within QEMU. + +So, putting this together, it seems like the problem lies with how system calls are being handled by QEMU for x86 architectures when using the cross-toolchain. Therefore, the category should be syscall. +</think> + +The issue is related to the handling of syscalls in QEMU for x86 architectures when running programs that use the system() function. This suggests a problem with the emulation of certain system calls (like fork(), execve(), and waitpid()) specific to i386 and x86_64 targets. + +**Answer:** syscall \ No newline at end of file |