1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1749393 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1749393
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..3c030d054
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1749393
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's try to figure out what category this bug falls into. The problem is that when running a PIE-compiled bash under qemu-user, it crashes because sbrk() isn't working. Bash uses its own malloc implementation which relies on sbrk(), and when run under qemu, it can't allocate memory properly.
+
+Hmm, the user mentioned that disabling their internal malloc and using glibc's instead works fine. That suggests that the issue is with how sbrk() is handled in qemu. Since sbrk() is a system call used by malloc implementations to request more memory from the OS, this likely points towards a problem with syscalls under qemu.
+
+Looking at the history, the user also noted that bash had similar issues before when run directly but was fixed in the kernel. Now it's only an issue under qemu. That implies that qemu isn't handling sbrk() correctly for PIE binaries or in some other way related to how it emulates the system calls.
+
+So, considering the options: instruction would relate to a specific CPU instruction being incorrect, which doesn't seem to be the case here. The problem is more about the environment or how syscalls are handled. Runtime errors are broader but since sbrk() is a syscall, the issue is specifically with how qemu handles that particular system call.
+
+Therefore, this bug is related to a syscall error in qemu.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where `sbrk()` does not function correctly under `qemu-user` when running a PIE-compiled binary. Since `sbrk()` is a system call used by the memory allocation functions, the problem lies within how `qemu-user` handles this specific system call.
+
+**Answer:** syscall
\ No newline at end of file