1 files changed, 22 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1926996 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1926996
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..f72fff3e1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1926996
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let's look at the problem described.
+
+The issue is that when running clone_test.c under qemu-aarch64-static, the clone() system call returns -1 with the error "Invalid argument". When run natively, it works correctly, so the problem must be in how qemu handles the clone syscall.
+
+In the bug report, the user provided output showing the native execution works fine. Under QEMU, the clone call fails. Since clone is a system call that requires proper emulation, including setting up child processes and handling flags correctly, this points towards an issue with how QEMU implements or emulates this specific syscall.
+
+Looking at the categories:
+
+- **Instruction**: This would be about faulty CPU instructions, but the problem here isn't related to executing an instruction; it's a system call failure.
+- **Syscall**: The clone() function is a system call. If QEMU doesn't handle it correctly (maybe incorrect flags or return values), this fits.
+- **Runtime**: Other runtime errors not related to syscalls or instructions, like memory management issues.
+
+Since the problem directly relates to handling the clone() syscall returning an error that suggests an invalid argument, and since QEMU's job includes emulating system calls accurately, the category is likely 'syscall'.
+
+So the classification should be 'syscall'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes a failure in the `clone()` system call when run under QEMU, indicating an issue with how this specific syscall is handled. Therefore, it falls under the 'syscall' category.
+
+**Answer:**  
+syscall
\ No newline at end of file