1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/324 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/324
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..5df76f862
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/324
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I have this bug report that says "chrome based apps can not be run under qemu user mode." I need to classify it into one of three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. 
+
+First, let me understand each category. Instruction issues involve problems with specific machine instructions not working correctly in QEMU. Syscall errors are related to system calls failing when using QEMU. Runtime errors are other types of problems that occur during the execution.
+
+The bug report mentions Chrome-based apps not running under qemu user mode. I know Chrome is a browser, but it's also used as a runtime for applications through technologies like NW.js or Electron. These apps run on top of Chrome's engine and use various system calls to function properly.
+
+So if Chrome-based apps aren't working in QEMU user mode, the issue might be related to how system calls are handled within that environment. Perhaps certain syscalls required by these applications aren't being correctly translated or emulated by QEMU. This would mean it's a syscall-related problem because the apps rely on specific interactions with the system that aren't functioning as expected in QEMU.
+
+I don't think it's an instruction issue because the problem isn't about executing a particular CPU instruction failing, but rather about applications not running properly, which is more about how they interact with the system. It also doesn't seem like a general runtime error unless all apps are failing, but since it's specifically Chrome-based, it points towards syscalls.
+</think>
+
+syscall
\ No newline at end of file