diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/system/953')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/system/953 | 15 |
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/system/953 b/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/system/953 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..6d4938bdb --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/system/953 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I'm trying to figure out whether this QEMU bug report is user-mode or system-mode related. The issue mentions "qemu-system-aarch64 asserts trying to execute STXP on hosts without HAVE_CMPXCHG128". + +First, I know that QEMU has two main modes: user mode and system mode. User mode emulates an environment where the guest code runs as a process in the host's userspace. System mode, on the other hand, emulates a full system, including peripherals, devices, and the OS running with higher privileges. + +The error here is about STXP, which I recall is a memory synchronization instruction used for atomic operations. The assertion is happening when executing this instruction on a host that doesn't support CMPXCHG128. This likely means QEMU is trying to handle an operation that isn't supported by the host's CPU. + +Now, considering whether this affects user-mode or system-mode. In user-mode, QEMU would be translating guest instructions to run as processes. If it hits an instruction like STXP that requires atomic operations beyond what the host can provide, that could cause issues. But wait, in user-mode, maybe there are alternative ways to emulate such operations without needing cmpxchg128. + +On the other hand, system-mode involves emulating a full system, which includes handling device drivers and lower-level instructions that interact with hardware more directly. If QEMU is making assertions about not having cmpxchg128 support in system mode, it's probably because certain device or kernel operations require this atomicity, which isn't available on the host. + +So, since this error seems to be about handling a specific instruction that might be part of a device driver or lower-level OS operation, it likely falls under system-mode. The higher privileges and direct hardware interaction make it more probable that this is a system-mode issue. +</think> + +system \ No newline at end of file |