summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1221966
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1221966')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/122196617
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1221966 b/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1221966
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..2b3c92a12
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1221966
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out whether this bug report is about user-mode or system-mode in QEMU. Let's break down what the user provided.
+
+They're running a SunOS 5.8 box under RHEL 6.4 using QEMU. When they try to run 'ls' or any other command, it segfaults. They tried different versions of QEMU and even a statically linked sh, but the problem persists.
+
+Looking at the GDB output, the segfault happens in static_code_gen_buffer(). The backtrace shows that it's going through cpu_tb_exec, then cpu_sparc_exec, which is part of the CPU execution loop. Finally, it points to main() in main.c at line 4083. 
+
+I know that QEMU has two modes: user-mode and system-mode. User-mode emulation runs binaries directly without a full OS, while system-mode emulates the entire machine with peripherals.
+
+In this case, since they're trying to run 'ls' which is an executable from SunOS, it sounds like they might be using user-mode emulation because they don't have the full OS environment set up. The fact that it's failing in static_code_gen_buffer() suggests there's an issue with how QEMU is generating code for SPARC binaries in user mode.
+
+Also, the backtrace shows functions related to CPU execution loops which are part of the user-mode setup. There's no mention of device emulation or system-level calls like booting an OS, which would be more indicative of system-mode issues.
+
+So putting it all together, this bug seems related to user-mode because they're trying to execute a binary directly without a full OS context and encountering code generation issues in that environment.
+</think>
+
+user
\ No newline at end of file