summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1765970
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1765970')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/176597013
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1765970 b/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1765970
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..2737c1812
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1765970
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's try to figure out whether this bug is user-mode or system-mode related. The user reported that after upgrading QEMU from 2.10.1 to 2.11.1 on a Gentoo host, their uclibc-ng chroot environment started segfaulting when running Python and importing the portage module using qemu-arm in user mode.
+
+They provided a backtrace showing where the segmentation fault occurs. The trace starts at `cpu_tb_exec` in `cpu-exec.c`, which is part of QEMU's TCG (Translation-Caching-Generator) acceleration. The error happens during code generation or execution within the emulator, not involving any hardware devices or system-level operations.
+
+The user also mentioned that other chroots with glibc and musl don't have this issue, so it seems specific to uclibc-ng. They bisected QEMU and found a commit related to `MAX_RESERVED_VA` which they reverted to fix the problem. This suggests it's an issue within how QEMU handles memory or code generation for ARM in user mode.
+
+Since the problem occurs when running user-space programs (like Python) inside the chroot using qemu-arm, and not when dealing with system-level operations like device emulation or higher privileges, this points towards a user-mode issue. The bug affects the execution of applications within the emulated environment without involving QEMU's system-mode features such as virtual devices or kernels.
+
+Therefore, it's likely a user-mode related problem.
+</think>
+
+user
\ No newline at end of file