diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/1388')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/1388 | 11 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/1388 b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/1388 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..08c5f98d4 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/1388 @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +<think> +Okay, let's see. The user is reporting an issue with the QEMU 7.2.0 Windows installers not being available on the specified repositories. They mention that the latest version there is 7.2.0.RC4 from December 8, 2022. The problem is that the final 7.2.0 isn't present for x86/x64. + +First, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. + +The user isn't describing a problem with running QEMU or an error during execution. They're pointing out that the installers aren't available in the repository, which is more about the distribution or availability of the software rather than an error in the code itself. However, the categories provided don't include a "distribution" or "availability" category. + +Looking at the options again, "instruction" refers to a faulty instruction in the bug report. The user's report is about the absence of files, not incorrect instructions. "Syscall" is about system call errors, which isn't relevant here. "Runtime" covers other runtime errors, but this isn't a runtime issue either. The problem is about the repository not having the correct version, which is a build or release management issue. Since none of the categories perfectly fit, but the closest might be "runtime" as a catch-all for other errors, but I'm not sure. Wait, maybe the user is following a set of predefined categories, so perhaps "instruction" isn't right here. Since the user isn't reporting a wrong instruction but rather a missing file, maybe it's not an instruction error. The problem is about the availability of the installer, which isn't covered by the given categories. However, since the options are limited, maybe it's a "runtime" error, but I'm not certain. Alternatively, maybe it's a documentation or packaging issue, but those categories aren't listed. Since the user is pointing out that the final version isn't in the repository, perhaps it's a build or release issue. But according to the categories provided, the best fit might be "instruction" if the user is supposed to follow certain steps that are missing, but the problem here is the absence of files. Hmm. Maybe this is a misclassification scenario where the correct category isn't present. But given the options, perhaps the answer is "runtime" as a catch-all for other errors. Or maybe "instruction" if the user is following an instruction that's faulty. Wait, the user's problem is that the installers aren't available, so maybe the instruction to get the installer is wrong. But the user didn't say they followed an instruction; they just reported the absence. So perhaps it's not an instruction error. Since none of the categories perfectly fit, but the user is reporting a problem that's not during runtime, syscall, or instruction, maybe the answer is "runtime" as the default. But I'm not entirely sure. Alternatively, maybe it's a documentation issue, but that's not an option. Given the constraints, I'll go with "runtime" as the closest possible category, even though it's not a perfect fit. +</think> + +runtime \ No newline at end of file |