diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/1779634')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/1779634 | 17 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/1779634 b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/1779634 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..1d0456837 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/1779634 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +<think> +Okay, let's see. The user is trying to run x86_64 binaries on an aarch64 system using QEMU. They built QEMU statically and set up binfmt_misc to handle the execution. The problem occurs when they run the firmware upgrade tools inside a Docker container, resulting in "Synchronous External Abort" errors in the kernel log. + +First, I need to understand what a Synchronous External Abort is. From what I remember, this is an ARM-specific exception. On ARM architectures, various abort types handle memory access issues. A Synchronous External Abort typically indicates a memory access problem that the memory management unit (MMU) couldn't handle, like an invalid address or permission issue. + +The user is using QEMU's user-mode emulation to run x86_64 programs. The error happens during the execution of these programs, so the problem might be related to how QEMU is emulating the x86_64 instructions on ARM. Since the error is a Synchronous External Abort, it's likely a memory-related issue during the emulation process. + +Looking at the categories provided: instruction, syscall, runtime. The error is a kernel-level abort, which might be triggered by an invalid instruction or a memory access. But the category 'instruction' is for a faulty instruction described in the bug. However, in this case, the error is a runtime exception from the kernel due to a memory access problem during emulation. The QEMU might be generating incorrect memory accesses when emulating the x86_64 code, leading to the abort. + +Alternatively, if the problem was a syscall, the error would relate to system call handling. But the error here is a lower-level memory access issue. The 'runtime' category is for other runtime errors, but the 'instruction' category would apply if there's a specific instruction causing the problem. However, the error message from the kernel is about a memory abort, not an invalid instruction. + +Wait, the Synchronous External Abort is triggered by a memory access that the system can't handle. So QEMU's emulation might be trying to access an invalid memory address when translating or executing the x86_64 instructions. That would be a runtime error in QEMU's emulation process. However, if the problem is that the emulated code is generating an invalid instruction that causes the abort, then it's an 'instruction' issue. But the error message points to a memory address (0x0000000000429958) where the abort occurred, which suggests a memory access problem during execution. + +But the categories are instruction, syscall, or runtime. Since the error is a synchronous abort due to memory access during emulation, which is part of the execution of the emulated program, it's likely a runtime error. However, if the root cause is that QEMU is translating an x86 instruction into an ARM instruction that causes the memory abort, then maybe it's an instruction issue. But without more details on the specific instruction, it's hard to say. The error is reported by the kernel as a memory abort, which is a runtime issue. Therefore, the correct category might be 'runtime'. +</think> + +runtime \ No newline at end of file |