diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/1895')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/1895 | 19 |
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/1895 b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/1895 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..dbf51b655 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/1895 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +<think> +Okay, let's see. The user is reporting a bug with QEMU-user mode where a program (g++) segfaults when run under QEMU RISC-V 64, but works on real hardware. The problem seems to be related to the stack size. The description mentions that QEMU-user uses a fixed stack size and ignores the RLIMIT_STACK request, which leads to the crash. + +So, the key here is that the stack size is an issue. The QEMU-user static binary might have a fixed stack, which isn't adjustable via the normal Unix mechanism (RLIMIT_STACK). When the program (g++) runs, it probably needs a larger stack than what QEMU provides, leading to a segmentation fault. Since this doesn't happen on real hardware, it's definitely a QEMU-specific problem. + +Now, how to classify this bug. The categories are instruction, syscall, or runtime. + +Instruction-related bugs are about incorrect execution of specific CPU instructions. The problem here isn't about executing a wrong instruction, but rather about the stack size setup. + +Syscall errors involve system calls. RLIMIT_STACK is about resource limits, which is handled via syscalls. But the issue here is that QEMU isn't respecting the RLIMIT_STACK, which is a system call-related resource limit. However, the problem is more about how QEMU manages the stack size in user mode. + +Runtime errors are other issues that occur during program execution that don't fit into the other categories. Since the stack size is a runtime configuration, and QEMU isn't honoring the system's stack limits, leading to a crash during runtime, this seems like a runtime issue. + +But wait, maybe it's a syscall issue because the RLIMIT_STACK is set via a system call. However, QEMU-user might not be properly handling that resource limit. But QEMU-user doesn't run the actual OS; it's emulating the user space. So when a program tries to set the stack size via RLIMIT_STACK, QEMU might not be respecting that, leading to a stack overflow. + +In this case, the problem is that QEMU isn't passing the system's stack limit to the emulated process, thus the stack is too small. This is a runtime configuration problem in QEMU. So the correct category would be 'runtime' because it's about how the runtime environment (QEMU) is handling the stack size, not a specific syscall or instruction. +</think> + +runtime \ No newline at end of file |