summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/zero-shot/105/assembly/1883784
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/zero-shot/105/assembly/1883784')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/zero-shot/105/assembly/188378461
1 files changed, 61 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot/105/assembly/1883784 b/results/classifier/zero-shot/105/assembly/1883784
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..f5c17182f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot/105/assembly/1883784
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+assembly: 0.972
+other: 0.911
+instruction: 0.906
+graphic: 0.881
+semantic: 0.818
+device: 0.696
+mistranslation: 0.631
+network: 0.625
+KVM: 0.570
+vnc: 0.551
+boot: 0.516
+socket: 0.469
+
+[ppc64le] qemu behavior differs from ppc64le hardware
+
+I have some code which passes my test suite on PPC64LE hardware when compiled with GCC 10, but the saem binary fails with both qemu-ppc64le 4.2 (on Fedora 32) and qemu-ppc64le-static 5.0.0 (Debian testing).
+
+I'm not getting any errors about illegal instructions or anything, like that; the results are just silently different on qemu.
+
+I've generated a reduced test case, which is attached along with the binaries (both are the same code, one is just statically linked).  They should execute successufully on PPC64LE hardware, but on qemu they hit a __builtin_abort (because the computed value doesn't match the expected value).
+
+Without being familiar with PPC assembly I'm not sure what else I can do, but if there is anything please let me know.
+
+
+
+Did you try to run it in a qemu-system-ppc64 guest?
+It would help to know if it is a tcg or a linux-user bug.
+
+I just ran the provided binaries on a qemu-system-ppc64 version 5.0-5 from Debian Bullseye and they also aborted there
+
+The QEMU project is currently moving its bug tracking to another system.
+For this we need to know which bugs are still valid and which could be
+closed already. Thus we are setting older bugs to "Incomplete" now.
+
+If the bug has already been fixed in the latest upstream version of QEMU,
+then please close this ticket as "Fix released".
+
+If it is not fixed yet and you think that this bug report here is still
+valid, then you have two options:
+
+1) If you already have an account on gitlab.com, please open a new ticket
+for this problem in our new tracker here:
+
+    https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues
+
+and then close this ticket here on Launchpad (or let it expire auto-
+matically after 60 days). Please mention the URL of this bug ticket on
+Launchpad in the new ticket on GitLab.
+
+2) If you don't have an account on gitlab.com and don't intend to get
+one, but still would like to keep this ticket opened, then please switch
+the state back to "New" within the next 60 days (otherwise it will get
+closed as "Expired"). We will then eventually migrate the ticket auto-
+matically to the new system (but you won't be the reporter of the bug
+in the new system and thus won't get notified on changes anymore).
+
+Thank you and sorry for the inconvenience.
+
+
+[Expired for QEMU because there has been no activity for 60 days.]
+