From d0c85e36e4de67af628d54e9ab577cc3fad7796a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Krinitsin Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 07:27:52 +0000 Subject: add deepseek and gemma results --- .../classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1303926 | 11 ----------- 1 file changed, 11 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1303926 (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1303926') diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1303926 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1303926 deleted file mode 100644 index 002b65160..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1303926 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,11 +0,0 @@ - -Okay, I need to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user mentioned that qemu-system-x86_64 crashed with SIGABRT after upgrading to version 2.0 in trusty. Looking at the categories provided, I see options like 'mistranslation', 'assembly', and others related to specific components. - -The crash is a segmentation fault (SIGABRT), which usually indicates a runtime error, possibly due to invalid memory access or an assertion failure. Since it's happening with QEMU, which is a hypervisor, the issue might be in how virtualization is handled. - -I don't see any clues pointing towards assembly issues or incorrect translations. The crash seems more related to system-level components rather than user-mode problems. Considering the options, 'hypervisor' fits because QEMU functions as one, and such crashes are common in hypervisors due to complex interactions with hardware or virtual machines. - -Other categories like network or device don't seem relevant here since the report doesn't mention those areas. The crash is more about the core functionality of QEMU's hypervisor role. - - -hypervisor \ No newline at end of file -- cgit 1.4.1