From d0c85e36e4de67af628d54e9ab577cc3fad7796a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Krinitsin Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 07:27:52 +0000 Subject: add deepseek and gemma results --- .../deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1362635 | 19 ------------------- 1 file changed, 19 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1362635 (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1362635') diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1362635 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1362635 deleted file mode 100644 index e68be33ab..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1362635 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,19 +0,0 @@ - -Okay, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU. Let's see what the issue is. - -The problem is about a "co-routine re-entered recursively" error when calling bdrv_read in a loop. The user provided code snippets and described how it leads to failure. - -Looking at the code: In the coroutine function bdrv_co_io_em, after getting an AIOCB from either read or write, there's a call to qemu_coroutine_yield(). Then, the completion handler bdrv_co_io_em_complete sets co.ret and enters the coroutine again. - -The issue arises because if this process is called recursively without proper synchronization, it can lead to re-entering the same coroutine, causing a crash. - -So, what category does this fall into? The possible categories include things like mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, network, etc. But here, we're dealing with coroutines and asynchronous I/O completions leading to recursive calls. This seems related to how QEMU handles concurrency and async operations within the hypervisor context. - -Wait, the main issue is about coroutine re-entry causing a crash due to improper handling of the state when resuming. This isn't a direct translation error or assembly problem. It's more about how coroutines are managed during I/O operations, which relates to the hypervisor's internal handling. - -Looking at the categories again: 'hypervisor' seems appropriate because it's dealing with QEMU's coroutine management in the context of block device operations, which is part of the hypervisor's responsibilities. - - -The issue involves coroutines within QEMU's block driver layer leading to a recursive re-entry. This pertains to how QEMU handles concurrency and async I/O completions internally, which falls under the 'hypervisor' category. - -**Answer:** hypervisor \ No newline at end of file -- cgit 1.4.1