From 25f8033d556aa17afaea4a5196ea7a69fe248320 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Krinitsin Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 12:34:26 +0000 Subject: add new temporary deepseek-r1:14b results --- .../classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1533848 | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1533848 (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1533848') diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1533848 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1533848 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a32f69917 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1533848 @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ + +Alright, let me try to figure out the category for this bug report. The user provided some possible categories, and I need to choose one based on the description. + +The bug is about Windows 7 not reading the SLIC ACPI table when using OVMF in QEMU. It mentions that the issue arises because the OEM ID and table ID don't match across certain tables (SLIC, XSDT, RSDT, FADT). From what I know, OVMF is a firmware payload used by UEFI systems, which suggests this has to do with how virtualization handles ACPI tables. + +Looking at the categories: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. Since it's related to ACPI and OVMF, which is part of UEFI and virtualized firmware, I think 'hypervisor' might be the right category because QEMU acts as a hypervisor when using KVM or other virtualization technologies. The issue is about how the hypervisor presents the hardware to the guest OS, specifically in the ACPI tables. + +Alternatively, 'boot' could be considered since it affects the boot process, but I think 'hypervisor' is more precise here because it's about the virtualization layer and how it handles firmware tables. + + +hypervisor \ No newline at end of file -- cgit 1.4.1