From d0c85e36e4de67af628d54e9ab577cc3fad7796a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Krinitsin Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 07:27:52 +0000 Subject: add deepseek and gemma results --- results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/270 | 11 ----------- 1 file changed, 11 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/270 (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/270') diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/270 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/270 deleted file mode 100644 index ef98d8282..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/270 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,11 +0,0 @@ - -Alright, let's try to figure out which category this bug report falls into. The bug says that virtio only supports packed ring sizes that are powers of two. Hmm, I'm not super familiar with all the QEMU components, but I know that VirtIO is related to device emulation. - -VirtIO devices use queues for communication between the host and guest. The ring size being a power of two likely refers to how these queues are configured. If it's only supporting powers of two, maybe there's an issue in the way the hypervisor (QEMU) handles queue sizes when setting up VirtIO devices. - -Looking at the categories provided: hypervisor makes sense here because QEMU functions as a hypervisor for KVM. The bug is about device configuration specifics, which ties into how the hypervisor manages resources like ring buffers. So I think 'hypervisor' is the right category. - - -The bug report mentions an issue with VirtIO supporting only packed ring sizes that are powers of two. This relates to how VirtIO devices are configured in QEMU, specifically regarding queue size configurations. Since VirtIO is part of the device emulation and configuration handled by the hypervisor (QEMU), this falls under the 'hypervisor' category. - -**hypervisor** \ No newline at end of file -- cgit 1.4.1