From d0c85e36e4de67af628d54e9ab577cc3fad7796a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Krinitsin Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 07:27:52 +0000 Subject: add deepseek and gemma results --- .../classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/891625 | 13 ------------- 1 file changed, 13 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/891625 (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/891625') diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/891625 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/891625 deleted file mode 100644 index e82e348ee..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/891625 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,13 +0,0 @@ - -Alright, I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user provided a list of possible categories and wants me to pick one based on the given bug report. - -The bug report says: "add vhost-net to kvm group udev rules 65-kvm.rules" and mentions authorizing the kvm group to access vhost-net, similar to how the kvm device is handled. - -I know that QEMU uses KVM for virtualization. Vhost-net is related to network virtualization in QEMU/KVM setups. The issue here is about udev rules, which are part of the system's device management, specifically handling permissions and access to devices. - -Looking at the categories provided: hypervisor, kernel, peripherals, etc. Hypervisor makes sense because KVM is a hypervisor, and vhost-net is part of the virtualization stack. The user is talking about group permissions for KVM, which is handled via udev rules tied to the hypervisor setup. - -Other categories like 'network' might be relevant, but the main focus here is on the kvm group's access rights, which falls under hypervisor configuration. So I think 'hypervisor' is the right category. - - -hypervisor \ No newline at end of file -- cgit 1.4.1