From d0c85e36e4de67af628d54e9ab577cc3fad7796a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Krinitsin Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 07:27:52 +0000 Subject: add deepseek and gemma results --- results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/hypervisor/1999 | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/hypervisor/1999 (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/hypervisor/1999') diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/hypervisor/1999 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/hypervisor/1999 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ed8b1b80e --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/hypervisor/1999 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ + +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report related to QEMU. The user provided a detailed description and some code snippets, but since I'm supposed to respond with just the category name, let me go through it step by step. + +First, looking at the problem: When using VPP in the guest and DPDK for QEMU, qemu crashes with sigabrt when setting up an interface. The user traced the issue to a specific function called setup_routing_entry. + +The code in question is checking for existing entries in the IRQ routing table. It's iterating through each entry (ei) in the list and checking if either of them is of type KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_IRQCHIP, or if their irqchip matches. If any condition is met, it returns -EINVAL, which probably causes an error that leads to the crash. + +The debug printk output shows that ei->type is 2, KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_IRQCHIP is 1, and ue->u.irqchip.irqchip is 2 while ei's is a large number (4276097024). This suggests that there might be an issue with how irqchips are being handled or compared. + +The categories provided include things like network, hypervisor, kernel, etc. Since this involves KVM and IRQ routing within QEMU, which interacts with the hypervisor layer (KVM), I think it's related to the hypervisor category. + + +hypervisor \ No newline at end of file -- cgit 1.4.1