From 238ec2b7cc1557d6f34c33cc482e4d0cd3e266dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Krinitsin Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2025 16:43:19 +0000 Subject: add results --- .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/122 | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/122 (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/122') diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/122 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/122 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..0f57695a2 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/122 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ + +Okay, I need to classify this bug report for QEMU. The issue mentioned is "linux-user does not check PROT_EXEC". Let me break it down. + +First, I remember that QEMU has different modes, including user mode emulation (linux-user) which allows running binaries from one OS on another. So the problem is in that part of QEMU. + +The term PROT_EXEC refers to a memory protection flag used in syscalls like mmap or mprotect. It allows execution of code in that memory region. If linux-user isn't checking this, it might lead to security issues because it could allow executing unauthorized code. + +Now, looking at the categories: instruction, syscall, runtime. This issue is about how QEMU handles PROT_EXEC in user mode. It's more about how the emulation interacts with system calls and memory protections rather than a specific instruction or runtime error elsewhere. + +So, the problem relates to syscalls and how they're handled. Therefore, it falls under 'syscall'. + + +The bug report pertains to the handling of PROT_EXEC within the linux-user mode of QEMU, which affects how system calls related to memory protection are managed. + +syscalls \ No newline at end of file -- cgit 1.4.1