From d0c85e36e4de67af628d54e9ab577cc3fad7796a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Krinitsin Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 07:27:52 +0000 Subject: add deepseek and gemma results --- results/classifier/gemma3:12b/files/728 | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) create mode 100644 results/classifier/gemma3:12b/files/728 (limited to 'results/classifier/gemma3:12b/files/728') diff --git a/results/classifier/gemma3:12b/files/728 b/results/classifier/gemma3:12b/files/728 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..df8a39ce2 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/gemma3:12b/files/728 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ + +Catch up to latest VHDX v2(=0x01) rev-7.0 specification +Additional information: +Below issues need to be addressed before or during the tackling of this issue. +- ~#727 VHDX is corrupted on expansion.~ +- #136 windows qemu-img create vpc/vhdx error due to sparse files +- #1605 On windows, 2nd kind vhdx-dyn bug, crash on Unexpected error in bdrv_check_qiov_request() in io.c +- #806 Fixed VHDX inflates beyond its fixed size when data is copied onto it and also corrupts +- +This VHDX support applies to qemu build on any architecture, not just the windows-build. + +It is very likely, that the native hypervisor on windows WHPX will be the main hypervisor displacing haxm/vbox etc. VHDX, if it works, seems to be the virtual-disk format that is ideal +- for Linux/windows dual-boot machines, +- for clusters with Linux/windows servers sharing images from a network-storage +- for WSL2/Hyper-V + +Following a similar line of thought, NTFS/ExFat may be ideal for sharing data/images between Linux and Windows. So the storing, modification and drive attachment of VHDX files on these filesystems need to be just as well-tested as native Linux filesystems. As their driver are internal-kernel-drivers and not fuse/dokan-drivers, on both operating-systems, they are also performant. -- cgit 1.4.1