From 5aa276efcbd67f4300ca1a7f809c6e00aadb03da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Krinitsin Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 13:28:15 +0200 Subject: restructure results --- results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/categories.csv | 4 +- .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1033 | 13 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1054831 | 31 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1066909 | 18 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1075272 | 19 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1075339 | 19 - .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/122 | 15 - .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/127 | 18 - .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1394 | 15 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1416988 | 17 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1643619 | 17 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1673976 | 23 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1701973 | 19 - .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1729 | 18 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1734792 | 17 - .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1760 | 22 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1761153 | 21 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1783362 | 19 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1805913 | 22 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1810433 | 19 - .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1837 | 11 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1869073 | 25 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1869241 | 22 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1910605 | 21 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1926521 | 17 - .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2101 | 23 - .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2122 | 15 - .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2262 | 17 - .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2333 | 23 - .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2410 | 14 - .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2446 | 21 - .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2553 | 22 - .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/570 | 11 - .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/602 | 15 - .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/817 | 13 - .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/829 | 21 - .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/833 | 21 - .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/911 | 17 - .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/957 | 17 - .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/982 | 27 - .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1033 | 13 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1054831 | 31 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1066909 | 18 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1075272 | 19 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1075339 | 19 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/122 | 15 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/127 | 18 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1394 | 15 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1416988 | 17 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1643619 | 17 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1673976 | 23 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1701973 | 19 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1729 | 18 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1734792 | 17 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1760 | 22 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1761153 | 21 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1783362 | 19 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1805913 | 22 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1810433 | 19 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1837 | 11 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1869073 | 25 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1869241 | 22 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1910605 | 21 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1926521 | 17 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2101 | 23 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2122 | 15 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2262 | 17 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2333 | 23 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2410 | 14 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2446 | 21 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2553 | 22 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/570 | 11 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/602 | 15 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/817 | 13 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/829 | 21 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/833 | 21 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/911 | 17 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/957 | 17 + .../deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/982 | 27 + .../no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/analysis.csv | 3 +- .../no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/categories.csv | 8 +- .../reasoning/instruction/1156313 | 7 + .../reasoning/instruction/1267955 | 27 + .../reasoning/instruction/1541 | 5 + .../reasoning/instruction/1737444 | 9 + .../reasoning/instruction/449 | 5 + .../reasoning/manual-review/1072 | 9 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1156313 | 7 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1267955 | 27 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1311614 | 7 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1346769 | 13 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1388 | 9 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1416988 | 31 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1462640 | 3 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1541 | 5 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1594394 | 6 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1716767 | 5 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1737444 | 9 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1776478 | 3 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1777226 | 7 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1783362 | 5 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1785203 | 5 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1813398 | 9 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1821444 | 5 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1858461 | 5 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1869241 | 9 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1884719 | 3 - .../reasoning/manual-review/1906193 | 12 - .../reasoning/manual-review/2825 | 5 - .../reasoning/manual-review/449 | 5 - .../reasoning/manual-review/456 | 8 - .../reasoning/manual-review/714 | 7 - .../reasoning/runtime/1072 | 9 + .../reasoning/runtime/1311614 | 7 + .../reasoning/runtime/1388 | 9 + .../reasoning/runtime/1416988 | 31 + .../reasoning/runtime/1462640 | 3 + .../reasoning/runtime/1594394 | 6 + .../reasoning/runtime/1716767 | 5 + .../reasoning/runtime/1776478 | 3 + .../reasoning/runtime/1777226 | 7 + .../reasoning/runtime/1813398 | 9 + .../reasoning/runtime/1821444 | 5 + .../reasoning/runtime/1858461 | 5 + .../reasoning/runtime/1869241 | 9 + .../reasoning/runtime/456 | 8 + .../reasoning/runtime/714 | 7 + .../reasoning/syscall/1346769 | 13 + .../reasoning/syscall/1783362 | 5 + .../reasoning/syscall/1785203 | 5 + .../reasoning/syscall/1884719 | 3 + .../reasoning/syscall/1906193 | 12 + .../reasoning/syscall/2825 | 5 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/analysis.csv | 4 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/categories.csv | 4 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1010484 | 12 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1027 | 21 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1028 | 40 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1031920 | 43 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1034 | 23 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1041 | 37 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1052857 | 21 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1054812 | 11 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1054831 | 23 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1059 | 16 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1066909 | 13 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1068900 | 11 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1070 | 16 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1072 | 30 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1075 | 22 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1075339 | 9 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1076445 | 51 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1079080 | 16 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1092 | 20 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1093 | 39 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1095531 | 63 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1095857 | 17 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1098729 | 49 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1128 | 30 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1129571 | 20 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1147 | 15 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1156 | 7 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1156313 | 132 ++ .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1165383 | 9 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1178 | 7 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1182490 | 82 ++ .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1207896 | 9 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1209 | 11 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/121 | 7 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1211 | 13 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/122 | 7 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1221966 | 40 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1228 | 49 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1233225 | 30 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1245543 | 29 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1245703 | 15 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1248 | 17 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1248168 | 30 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1251 | 21 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1254672 | 47 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1254786 | 48 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1254828 | 43 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1255 | 17 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1261743 | 11 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1263747 | 35 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1283519 | 16 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1285363 | 51 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1287195 | 9 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1308381 | 20 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1311614 | 53 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1328996 | 9 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1339 | 22 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1356916 | 12 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1357206 | 65 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1357226 | 17 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1361912 | 15 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1362635 | 48 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1368 | 44 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1370 | 19 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1371 | 25 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1372 | 26 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1373 | 26 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1374 | 28 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1375 | 25 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1376 | 21 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1377 | 19 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1388 | 20 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1394 | 67 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1397 | 7 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1404690 | 44 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1412 | 11 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1416988 | 38 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1428352 | 50 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1429313 | 15 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1435 | 22 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1441 | 40 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1452 | 7 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1457275 | 111 ++ .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1462640 | 41 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1469342 | 9 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1471 | 22 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1494 | 938 ++++++++++++++ .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1495 | 12 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1519037 | 13 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1527765 | 78 ++ .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1528 | 15 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1528239 | 51 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1531 | 21 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1533141 | 21 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1536 | 22 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1541 | 38 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1547 | 18 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1553 | 18 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1563612 | 56 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1568107 | 15 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1574346 | 18 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1585840 | 15 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1590336 | 21 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1591611 | 29 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1593 | 13 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1594069 | 14 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1603734 | 13 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1605123 | 34 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1611394 | 35 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1612 | 57 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1613817 | 62 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1614348 | 45 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1619896 | 56 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1620 | 100 ++ .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1637 | 7 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1641637 | 719 +++++++++++ .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1641861 | 42 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1642 | 28 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1648 | 64 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1654137 | 13 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1661815 | 32 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1673976 | 17 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1696353 | 41 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1696773 | 13 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1697 | 25 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1701808 | 22 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1701973 | 23 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1701974 | 23 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1707 | 29 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1713066 | 25 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1716767 | 40 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1722 | 93 ++ .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1724485 | 24 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1725267 | 37 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1726394 | 11 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1729 | 53 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1734 | 22 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1737 | 55 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1738434 | 34 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1740219 | 65 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1741 | 7 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1748296 | 31 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1748612 | 21 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1749393 | 32 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1751422 | 10 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1751494 | 42 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1755 | 26 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1756 | 49 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1756519 | 52 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1756807 | 73 ++ .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1761153 | 29 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1761401 | 16 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1763 | 18 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1768 | 38 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1768246 | 19 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1770 | 28 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1771 | 39 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1773743 | 27 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1776478 | 52 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1777226 | 21 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1779 | 36 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1780 | 23 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1781281 | 34 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1783362 | 53 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1790 | 35 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1791763 | 19 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1793119 | 35 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1793539 | 15 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1793608 | 22 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1796520 | 42 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1798 | 7 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1805 | 72 ++ .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1805913 | 27 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1806243 | 90 ++ .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1807 | 30 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1808565 | 13 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1809546 | 49 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1810433 | 53 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1812 | 31 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1812451 | 20 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1812861 | 28 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1813307 | 27 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1815024 | 21 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1818075 | 59 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1818483 | 48 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1820686 | 11 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1821430 | 38 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1821444 | 35 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1821515 | 44 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1824344 | 51 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1824778 | 13 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1826568 | 19 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1828867 | 14 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1829459 | 41 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1830 | 32 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1832422 | 15 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1832916 | 11 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1833 | 90 ++ .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1833668 | 33 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1834496 | 33 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1835693 | 23 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1835839 | 27 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1836078 | 28 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1836192 | 27 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1837 | 41 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1841990 | 44 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1847467 | 22 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1854 | 24 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1854738 | 34 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1857811 | 13 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1858415 | 30 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1859713 | 31 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1860053 | 26 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1860056 | 26 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1861404 | 56 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1862167 | 9 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1862986 | 70 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1863247 | 14 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1863445 | 22 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1869073 | 13 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1869241 | 25 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1869782 | 19 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1870477 | 39 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1874888 | 49 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1877794 | 9 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1878501 | 37 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1880332 | 13 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1880722 | 20 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1881450 | 29 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1883268 | 43 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1883784 | 15 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1885350 | 29 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1887306 | 61 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1888303 | 26 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1888728 | 25 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1889288 | 13 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1889411 | 69 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1890 | 31 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1892081 | 20 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1894029 | 45 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1895080 | 42 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1895471 | 29 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1895703 | 24 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1898954 | 32 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1901 | 25 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1904210 | 57 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1904259 | 35 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1905356 | 18 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1906193 | 63 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1906536 | 36 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1907969 | 64 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1908 | 55 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1908626 | 71 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1909921 | 28 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1910605 | 22 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1912934 | 23 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1913 | 25 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1913913 | 24 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1914021 | 33 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1914870 | 63 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1915327 | 40 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1915925 | 23 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1916269 | 25 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1916344 | 30 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1917184 | 11 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1918026 | 35 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1922887 | 36 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1925512 | 24 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1926044 | 36 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1926202 | 24 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1926246 | 56 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1926759 | 24 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1941 | 108 ++ .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1955 | 43 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1967248 | 44 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2035 | 60 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2072564 | 51 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2078 | 40 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2089 | 33 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2101 | 23 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2119 | 7 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2122 | 13 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2123 | 37 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2127 | 7 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2136 | 41 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2156 | 21 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2175 | 44 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2208 | 94 ++ .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2302 | 31 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2304 | 44 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2309 | 37 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2317 | 44 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2318 | 40 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2319 | 23 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2336 | 29 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2353 | 62 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2372 | 115 ++ .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2373 | 101 ++ .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2374 | 117 ++ .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2375 | 91 ++ .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2376 | 120 ++ .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2386 | 49 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2410 | 98 ++ .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2419 | 24 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2422 | 75 ++ .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2474 | 102 ++ .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2483 | 26 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2485 | 53 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2486 | 18 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2495 | 78 ++ .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2497 | 9 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2498 | 57 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2499 | 36 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2500 | 10 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2504 | 13 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2505 | 7 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2525 | 7 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2536 | 7 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2580 | 18 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2590 | 29 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2592 | 43 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2595 | 141 ++ .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2596 | 7 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2598 | 7 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/261 | 7 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2628 | 26 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/263 | 7 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2647 | 53 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2655 | 45 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/266 | 7 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2672 | 26 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2683 | 45 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2696 | 18 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2738 | 16 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/275 | 7 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/276 | 7 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2761 | 14 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2775 | 140 ++ .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/280 | 7 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2802 | 32 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2825 | 43 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2846 | 7 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2865 | 58 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2971 | 50 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/306 | 7 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/311 | 7 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/312 | 7 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/333 | 7 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/361 | 7 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/364 | 7 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/381 | 7 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/390 | 7 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/419 | 7 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/422 | 7 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/427 | 7 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/442 | 7 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/447 | 7 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/456 | 35 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/494 | 7 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/508 | 7 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/514 | 31 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/562107 | 18 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/577 | 31 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/578 | 36 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/579 | 56 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/616 | 113 ++ .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/625 | 29 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/633 | 38 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/654 | 29 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/690 | 25 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/693 | 16 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/697 | 7 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/704 | 7 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/714 | 49 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/739785 | 40 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/754 | 213 +++ .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/796480 | 51 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/799 | 53 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/805 | 20 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/817 | 7 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/824 | 18 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/826 | 22 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/829 | 20 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/833 | 48 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/834 | 65 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/837 | 36 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/886621 | 298 +++++ .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/909 | 17 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/911 | 23 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/922 | 26 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/927 | 38 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/947 | 19 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/95 | 7 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/952 | 103 ++ .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/984 | 29 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/998 | 66 + .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1010484 | 12 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1027 | 21 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1028 | 40 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1031920 | 43 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1034 | 23 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1041 | 37 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1052857 | 21 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1054812 | 11 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1054831 | 23 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1059 | 16 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1066909 | 13 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1068900 | 11 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1070 | 16 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1072 | 30 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1075 | 22 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1075339 | 9 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1076445 | 51 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1079080 | 16 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1092 | 20 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1093 | 39 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1095531 | 63 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1095857 | 17 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1098729 | 49 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1128 | 30 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1129571 | 20 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1147 | 15 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1156 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1156313 | 132 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1165383 | 9 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1178 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1182490 | 82 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1207896 | 9 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1209 | 11 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/121 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1211 | 13 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/122 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1221966 | 40 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1228 | 49 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1233225 | 30 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1245543 | 29 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1245703 | 15 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1248 | 17 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1248168 | 30 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1251 | 21 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1254672 | 47 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1254786 | 48 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1254828 | 43 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1255 | 17 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1261743 | 11 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1263747 | 35 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1283519 | 16 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1285363 | 51 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1287195 | 9 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1308381 | 20 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1311614 | 53 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1328996 | 9 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1339 | 22 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1356916 | 12 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1357206 | 65 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1357226 | 17 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1361912 | 15 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1362635 | 48 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1368 | 44 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1370 | 19 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1371 | 25 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1372 | 26 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1373 | 26 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1374 | 28 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1375 | 25 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1376 | 21 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1377 | 19 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1388 | 20 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1394 | 67 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1397 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1404690 | 44 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1412 | 11 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1416988 | 38 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1428352 | 50 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1429313 | 15 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1435 | 22 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1441 | 40 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1452 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1457275 | 111 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1462640 | 41 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1469342 | 9 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1471 | 22 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1494 | 938 -------------- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1495 | 12 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1519037 | 13 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1527765 | 78 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1528 | 15 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1528239 | 51 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1531 | 21 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1533141 | 21 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1536 | 22 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1541 | 38 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1547 | 18 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1553 | 18 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1563612 | 56 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1568107 | 15 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1574346 | 18 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1585840 | 15 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1590336 | 21 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1591611 | 29 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1593 | 13 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1594069 | 14 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1603734 | 13 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1605123 | 34 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1611394 | 35 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1612 | 57 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1613817 | 62 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1614348 | 45 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1619896 | 56 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1620 | 100 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1637 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1641637 | 719 ----------- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1641861 | 42 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1642 | 28 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1648 | 64 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1654137 | 13 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1661815 | 32 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1673976 | 17 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1696353 | 41 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1696773 | 13 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1697 | 25 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1701808 | 22 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1701973 | 23 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1701974 | 23 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1707 | 29 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1713066 | 25 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1716767 | 40 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1722 | 93 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1724485 | 24 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1725267 | 37 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1726394 | 11 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1729 | 53 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1734 | 22 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1737 | 55 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1738434 | 34 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1740219 | 65 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1741 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1748296 | 31 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1748612 | 21 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1749393 | 32 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1751422 | 10 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1751494 | 42 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1755 | 26 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1756 | 49 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1756519 | 52 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1756807 | 73 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1761153 | 29 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1761401 | 16 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1763 | 18 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1768 | 38 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1768246 | 19 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1770 | 28 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1771 | 39 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1773743 | 27 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1776478 | 52 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1777226 | 21 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1779 | 36 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1780 | 23 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1781281 | 34 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1783362 | 53 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1790 | 35 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1791763 | 19 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1793119 | 35 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1793539 | 15 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1793608 | 22 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1796520 | 42 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1798 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1805 | 72 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1805913 | 27 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1806243 | 90 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1807 | 30 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1808565 | 13 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1809546 | 49 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1810433 | 53 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1812 | 31 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1812451 | 20 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1812861 | 28 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1813307 | 27 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1815024 | 21 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1818075 | 59 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1818483 | 48 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1820686 | 11 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1821430 | 38 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1821444 | 35 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1821515 | 44 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1824344 | 51 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1824778 | 13 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1826568 | 19 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1828867 | 14 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1829459 | 41 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1830 | 32 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1832422 | 15 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1832916 | 11 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1833 | 90 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1833668 | 33 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1834496 | 33 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1835693 | 23 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1835839 | 27 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1836078 | 28 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1836192 | 27 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1837 | 41 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1841990 | 44 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1847467 | 22 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1854 | 24 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1854738 | 34 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1857811 | 13 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1858415 | 30 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1859713 | 31 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1860053 | 26 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1860056 | 26 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1861404 | 56 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1862167 | 9 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1862986 | 70 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1863247 | 14 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1863445 | 22 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1869073 | 13 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1869241 | 25 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1869782 | 19 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1870477 | 39 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1874888 | 49 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1877794 | 9 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1878501 | 37 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1880332 | 13 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1880722 | 20 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1881450 | 29 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1883268 | 43 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1883784 | 15 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1885350 | 29 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1887306 | 61 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1888303 | 26 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1888728 | 25 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1889288 | 13 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1889411 | 69 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1890 | 31 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1892081 | 20 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1894029 | 45 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1895080 | 42 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1895471 | 29 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1895703 | 24 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1898954 | 32 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1901 | 25 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1904210 | 57 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1904259 | 35 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1905356 | 18 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1906193 | 63 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1906536 | 36 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1907969 | 64 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1908 | 55 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1908626 | 71 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1909921 | 28 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1910605 | 22 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1912934 | 23 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1913 | 25 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1913913 | 24 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1914021 | 33 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1914870 | 63 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1915327 | 40 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1915925 | 23 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1916269 | 25 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1916344 | 30 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1917184 | 11 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1918026 | 35 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1922887 | 36 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1925512 | 24 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1926044 | 36 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1926202 | 24 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1926246 | 56 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1926759 | 24 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1941 | 108 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1955 | 43 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1967248 | 44 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2035 | 60 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2072564 | 51 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2078 | 40 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2089 | 33 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2101 | 23 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2119 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2122 | 13 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2123 | 37 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2127 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2136 | 41 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2156 | 21 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2175 | 44 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2208 | 94 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2302 | 31 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2304 | 44 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2309 | 37 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2317 | 44 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2318 | 40 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2319 | 23 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2336 | 29 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2353 | 62 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2372 | 115 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2373 | 101 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2374 | 117 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2375 | 91 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2376 | 120 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2386 | 49 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2410 | 98 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2419 | 24 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2422 | 75 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2474 | 102 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2483 | 26 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2485 | 53 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2486 | 18 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2495 | 78 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2497 | 9 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2498 | 57 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2499 | 36 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2500 | 10 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2504 | 13 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2505 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2525 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2536 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2580 | 18 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2590 | 29 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2592 | 43 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2595 | 141 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2596 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2598 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/261 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2628 | 26 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/263 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2647 | 53 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2655 | 45 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/266 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2672 | 26 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2683 | 45 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2696 | 18 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2738 | 16 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/275 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/276 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2761 | 14 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2775 | 140 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/280 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2802 | 32 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2825 | 43 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2846 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2865 | 58 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2971 | 50 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/306 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/311 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/312 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/333 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/361 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/364 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/381 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/390 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/419 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/422 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/427 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/442 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/447 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/456 | 35 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/494 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/508 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/514 | 31 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/562107 | 18 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/577 | 31 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/578 | 36 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/579 | 56 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/616 | 113 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/625 | 29 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/633 | 38 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/654 | 29 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/690 | 25 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/693 | 16 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/697 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/704 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/714 | 49 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/739785 | 40 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/754 | 213 --- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/796480 | 51 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/799 | 53 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/805 | 20 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/817 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/824 | 18 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/826 | 22 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/829 | 20 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/833 | 48 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/834 | 65 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/837 | 36 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/886621 | 298 ----- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/909 | 17 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/911 | 23 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/922 | 26 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/927 | 38 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/947 | 19 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/95 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/952 | 103 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/984 | 29 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/998 | 66 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1012 | 47 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1086 | 75 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1102 | 44 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1143 | 84 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1246990 | 44 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1267 | 99 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1319100 | 75 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1346769 | 42 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1346784 | 73 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1594394 | 47 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1605443 | 17 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1617929 | 56 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1623020 | 61 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1650 | 20 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1659901 | 15 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1671 | 1363 -------------------- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1701821 | 220 ---- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1701971 | 51 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1715162 | 78 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1727737 | 31 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1735384 | 26 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1736 | 73 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1737444 | 99 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1738545 | 37 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1756927 | 24 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1761535 | 42 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1765970 | 67 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1774149 | 82 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1779634 | 41 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1808563 | 23 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1813398 | 47 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1814128 | 161 --- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1832353 | 26 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1836558 | 54 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1840922 | 27 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1857 | 58 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1860610 | 13 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1880225 | 143 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1884719 | 138 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1895305 | 54 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1907817 | 49 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1910 | 68 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1915531 | 60 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1930 | 52 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1936977 | 13 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1952 | 102 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1953 | 152 --- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/2082 | 50 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/2083 | 117 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/2168 | 38 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/2170 | 50 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/2248 | 42 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/2333 | 51 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/2371 | 58 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/2390 | 69 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/2446 | 66 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/2460 | 14 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/2487 | 74 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/2560 | 111 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/2632 | 89 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/324 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/618 | 101 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/645662 | 46 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/698 | 364 ------ .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/856 | 67 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/866 | 59 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/904308 | 104 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/939 | 81 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/967 | 230 ---- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/979 | 13 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1007 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1010 | 84 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1022 | 39 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1033 | 33 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1044 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1051 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1075272 | 19 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1111 | 24 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1172613 | 69 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1187319 | 14 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1238 | 125 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1261 | 31 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1267955 | 48 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/127 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1294898 | 84 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1361 | 26 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/140 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1470170 | 46 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1478 | 72 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1512 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1516408 | 37 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1550503 | 19 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1606 | 35 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1643619 | 38 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1667401 | 73 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1689367 | 32 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1704638 | 71 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1716292 | 36 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1728116 | 53 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1734792 | 13 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1760 | 59 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1763536 | 89 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1785203 | 49 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1785734 | 81 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1791796 | 129 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1799200 | 46 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1819 | 16 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1821006 | 41 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1858461 | 29 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1861341 | 36 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1861605 | 22 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1873898 | 44 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1876373 | 54 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1886097 | 39 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1893010 | 11 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1894361 | 11 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1895 | 152 --- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1908551 | 60 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1909 | 56 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1926521 | 68 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1926996 | 26 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1927530 | 45 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/2027 | 239 ---- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/2112 | 32 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/2157 | 49 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/2197 | 64 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/2203 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/2223 | 41 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/2262 | 205 --- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/2448 | 52 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/2553 | 88 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/2569 | 11 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/2604 | 50 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/2606 | 204 --- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/2619 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/2730 | 16 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/2815 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/2878 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/326 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/355 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/356 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/385 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/449 | 74 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/470 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/570 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/602 | 19 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/695 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/754635 | 61 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/836 | 91 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/871 | 20 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/885 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/890 | 7 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/957 | 77 -- .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/982 | 43 - .../zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/993 | 87 -- .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1012 | 47 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1086 | 75 ++ .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1102 | 44 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1143 | 84 ++ .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1246990 | 44 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1267 | 99 ++ .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1319100 | 75 ++ .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1346769 | 42 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1346784 | 73 ++ .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1594394 | 47 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1605443 | 17 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1617929 | 56 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1623020 | 61 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1650 | 20 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1659901 | 15 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1671 | 1363 ++++++++++++++++++++ .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1701821 | 220 ++++ .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1701971 | 51 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1715162 | 78 ++ .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1727737 | 31 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1735384 | 26 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1736 | 73 ++ .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1737444 | 99 ++ .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1738545 | 37 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1756927 | 24 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1761535 | 42 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1765970 | 67 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1774149 | 82 ++ .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1779634 | 41 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1808563 | 23 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1813398 | 47 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1814128 | 161 +++ .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1832353 | 26 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1836558 | 54 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1840922 | 27 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1857 | 58 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1860610 | 13 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1880225 | 143 ++ .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1884719 | 138 ++ .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1895305 | 54 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1907817 | 49 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1910 | 68 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1915531 | 60 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1930 | 52 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1936977 | 13 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1952 | 102 ++ .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1953 | 152 +++ .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/2082 | 50 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/2083 | 117 ++ .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/2168 | 38 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/2170 | 50 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/2248 | 42 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/2333 | 51 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/2371 | 58 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/2390 | 69 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/2446 | 66 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/2460 | 14 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/2487 | 74 ++ .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/2560 | 111 ++ .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/2632 | 89 ++ results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/324 | 7 + results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/618 | 101 ++ .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/645662 | 46 + results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/698 | 364 ++++++ results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/856 | 67 + results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/866 | 59 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/904308 | 104 ++ results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/939 | 81 ++ results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/967 | 230 ++++ results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/979 | 13 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1007 | 7 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1010 | 84 ++ .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1022 | 39 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1033 | 33 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1044 | 7 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1051 | 7 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1075272 | 19 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1111 | 24 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1172613 | 69 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1187319 | 14 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1238 | 125 ++ .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1261 | 31 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1267955 | 48 + results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/127 | 7 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1294898 | 84 ++ .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1361 | 26 + results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/140 | 7 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1470170 | 46 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1478 | 72 ++ .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1512 | 7 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1516408 | 37 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1550503 | 19 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1606 | 35 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1643619 | 38 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1667401 | 73 ++ .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1689367 | 32 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1704638 | 71 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1716292 | 36 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1728116 | 53 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1734792 | 13 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1760 | 59 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1763536 | 89 ++ .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1785203 | 49 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1785734 | 81 ++ .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1791796 | 129 ++ .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1799200 | 46 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1819 | 16 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1821006 | 41 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1858461 | 29 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1861341 | 36 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1861605 | 22 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1873898 | 44 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1876373 | 54 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1886097 | 39 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1893010 | 11 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1894361 | 11 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1895 | 152 +++ .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1908551 | 60 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1909 | 56 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1926521 | 68 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1926996 | 26 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1927530 | 45 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/2027 | 239 ++++ .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/2112 | 32 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/2157 | 49 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/2197 | 64 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/2203 | 7 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/2223 | 41 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/2262 | 205 +++ .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/2448 | 52 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/2553 | 88 ++ .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/2569 | 11 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/2604 | 50 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/2606 | 204 +++ .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/2619 | 7 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/2730 | 16 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/2815 | 7 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/2878 | 7 + results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/326 | 7 + results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/355 | 7 + results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/356 | 7 + results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/385 | 7 + results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/449 | 74 ++ results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/470 | 7 + results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/570 | 7 + results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/602 | 19 + results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/695 | 7 + .../classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/754635 | 61 + results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/836 | 91 ++ results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/871 | 20 + results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/885 | 7 + results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/890 | 7 + results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/957 | 77 ++ results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/982 | 43 + results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/993 | 87 ++ 1237 files changed, 26148 insertions(+), 26141 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1033 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1054831 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1066909 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1075272 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1075339 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/122 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/127 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1394 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1416988 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1643619 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1673976 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1701973 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1729 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1734792 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1760 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1761153 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1783362 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1805913 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1810433 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1837 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1869073 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1869241 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1910605 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1926521 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2101 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2122 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2262 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2333 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2410 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2446 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2553 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/570 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/602 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/817 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/829 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/833 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/911 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/957 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/982 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1033 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1054831 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1066909 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1075272 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1075339 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/122 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/127 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1394 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1416988 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1643619 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1673976 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1701973 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1729 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1734792 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1760 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1761153 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1783362 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1805913 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1810433 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1837 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1869073 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1869241 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1910605 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1926521 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2101 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2122 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2262 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2333 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2410 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2446 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2553 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/570 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/602 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/817 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/829 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/833 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/911 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/957 create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/982 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1156313 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1267955 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1541 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1737444 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/449 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1072 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1156313 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1267955 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1311614 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1346769 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1388 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1416988 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1462640 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1541 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1594394 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1716767 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1737444 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1776478 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1777226 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1783362 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1785203 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1813398 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1821444 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1858461 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1869241 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1884719 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1906193 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2825 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/449 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/456 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/714 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1072 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1311614 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1388 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1416988 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1462640 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1594394 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1716767 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1776478 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1777226 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1813398 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1821444 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1858461 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1869241 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/456 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/714 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1346769 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1783362 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1785203 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1884719 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1906193 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2825 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/analysis.csv create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/categories.csv create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1010484 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1027 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1028 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1031920 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1034 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1041 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1052857 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1054812 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1054831 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1059 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1066909 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1068900 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1070 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1072 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1075 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1075339 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1076445 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1079080 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1092 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1093 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1095531 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1095857 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1098729 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1128 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1129571 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1147 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1156 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1156313 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1165383 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1178 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1182490 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1207896 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1209 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/121 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1211 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/122 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1221966 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1228 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1233225 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1245543 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1245703 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1248 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1248168 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1251 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1254672 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1254786 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1254828 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1255 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1261743 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1263747 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1283519 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1285363 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1287195 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1308381 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1311614 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1328996 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1339 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1356916 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1357206 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1357226 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1361912 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1362635 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1368 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1370 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1371 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1372 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1373 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1374 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1375 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1376 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1377 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1388 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1394 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1397 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1404690 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1412 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1416988 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1428352 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1429313 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1435 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1441 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1452 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1457275 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1462640 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1469342 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1471 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1494 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1495 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1519037 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1527765 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1528 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1528239 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1531 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1533141 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1536 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1541 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1547 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1553 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1563612 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1568107 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1574346 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1585840 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1590336 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1591611 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1593 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1594069 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1603734 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1605123 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1611394 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1612 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1613817 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1614348 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1619896 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1620 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1637 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1641637 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1641861 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1642 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1648 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1654137 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1661815 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1673976 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1696353 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1696773 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1697 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1701808 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1701973 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1701974 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1707 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1713066 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1716767 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1722 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1724485 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1725267 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1726394 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1729 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1734 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1737 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1738434 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1740219 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1741 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1748296 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1748612 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1749393 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1751422 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1751494 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1755 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1756 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1756519 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1756807 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1761153 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1761401 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1763 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1768 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1768246 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1770 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1771 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1773743 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1776478 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1777226 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1779 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1780 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1781281 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1783362 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1790 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1791763 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1793119 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1793539 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1793608 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1796520 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1798 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1805 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1805913 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1806243 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1807 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1808565 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1809546 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1810433 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1812 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1812451 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1812861 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1813307 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1815024 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1818075 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1818483 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1820686 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1821430 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1821444 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1821515 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1824344 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1824778 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1826568 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1828867 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1829459 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1830 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1832422 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1832916 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1833 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1833668 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1834496 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1835693 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1835839 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1836078 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1836192 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1837 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1841990 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1847467 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1854 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1854738 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1857811 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1858415 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1859713 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1860053 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1860056 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1861404 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1862167 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1862986 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1863247 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1863445 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1869073 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1869241 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1869782 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1870477 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1874888 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1877794 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1878501 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1880332 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1880722 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1881450 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1883268 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1883784 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1885350 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1887306 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1888303 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1888728 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1889288 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1889411 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1890 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1892081 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1894029 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1895080 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1895471 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1895703 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1898954 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1901 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1904210 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1904259 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1905356 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1906193 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1906536 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1907969 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1908 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1908626 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1909921 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1910605 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1912934 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1913 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1913913 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1914021 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1914870 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1915327 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1915925 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1916269 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1916344 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1917184 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1918026 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1922887 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1925512 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1926044 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1926202 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1926246 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1926759 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1941 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1955 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1967248 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2035 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2072564 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2078 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2089 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2101 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2119 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2122 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2123 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2127 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2136 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2156 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2175 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2208 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2302 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2304 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2309 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2317 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2318 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2319 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2336 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2353 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2372 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2373 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2374 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2375 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2376 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2386 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2410 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2419 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2422 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2474 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2483 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2485 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2486 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2495 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2497 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2498 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2499 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2500 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2504 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2505 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2525 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2536 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2580 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2590 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2592 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2595 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2596 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2598 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/261 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2628 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/263 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2647 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2655 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/266 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2672 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2683 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2696 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2738 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/275 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/276 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2761 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2775 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/280 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2802 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2825 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2846 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2865 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2971 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/306 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/311 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/312 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/333 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/361 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/364 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/381 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/390 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/419 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/422 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/427 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/442 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/447 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/456 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/494 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/508 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/514 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/562107 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/577 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/578 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/579 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/616 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/625 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/633 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/654 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/690 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/693 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/697 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/704 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/714 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/739785 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/754 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/796480 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/799 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/805 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/817 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/824 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/826 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/829 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/833 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/834 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/837 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/886621 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/909 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/911 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/922 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/927 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/947 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/95 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/952 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/984 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/998 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1010484 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1027 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1028 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1031920 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1034 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1041 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1052857 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1054812 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1054831 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1059 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1066909 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1068900 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1070 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1072 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1075 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1075339 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1076445 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1079080 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1092 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1093 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1095531 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1095857 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1098729 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1128 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1129571 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1147 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1156 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1156313 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1165383 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1178 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1182490 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1207896 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1209 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/121 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1211 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/122 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1221966 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1228 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1233225 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1245543 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1245703 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1248 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1248168 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1251 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1254672 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1254786 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1254828 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1255 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1261743 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1263747 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1283519 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1285363 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1287195 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1308381 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1311614 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1328996 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1339 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1356916 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1357206 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1357226 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1361912 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1362635 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1368 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1370 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1371 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1372 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1373 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1374 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1375 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1376 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1377 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1388 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1394 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1397 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1404690 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1412 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1416988 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1428352 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1429313 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1435 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1441 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1452 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1457275 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1462640 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1469342 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1471 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1494 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1495 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1519037 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1527765 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1528 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1528239 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1531 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1533141 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1536 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1541 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1547 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1553 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1563612 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1568107 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1574346 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1585840 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1590336 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1591611 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1593 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1594069 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1603734 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1605123 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1611394 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1612 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1613817 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1614348 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1619896 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1620 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1637 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1641637 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1641861 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1642 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1648 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1654137 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1661815 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1673976 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1696353 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1696773 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1697 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1701808 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1701973 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1701974 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1707 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1713066 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1716767 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1722 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1724485 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1725267 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1726394 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1729 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1734 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1737 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1738434 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1740219 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1741 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1748296 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1748612 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1749393 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1751422 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1751494 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1755 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1756 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1756519 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1756807 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1761153 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1761401 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1763 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1768 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1768246 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1770 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1771 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1773743 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1776478 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1777226 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1779 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1780 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1781281 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1783362 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1790 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1791763 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1793119 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1793539 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1793608 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1796520 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1798 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1805 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1805913 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1806243 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1807 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1808565 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1809546 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1810433 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1812 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1812451 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1812861 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1813307 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1815024 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1818075 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1818483 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1820686 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1821430 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1821444 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1821515 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1824344 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1824778 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1826568 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1828867 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1829459 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1830 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1832422 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1832916 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1833 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1833668 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1834496 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1835693 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1835839 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1836078 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1836192 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1837 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1841990 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1847467 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1854 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1854738 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1857811 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1858415 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1859713 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1860053 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1860056 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1861404 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1862167 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1862986 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1863247 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1863445 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1869073 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1869241 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1869782 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1870477 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1874888 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1877794 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1878501 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1880332 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1880722 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1881450 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1883268 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1883784 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1885350 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1887306 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1888303 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1888728 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1889288 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1889411 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1890 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1892081 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1894029 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1895080 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1895471 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1895703 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1898954 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1901 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1904210 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1904259 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1905356 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1906193 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1906536 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1907969 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1908 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1908626 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1909921 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1910605 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1912934 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1913 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1913913 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1914021 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1914870 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1915327 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1915925 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1916269 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1916344 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1917184 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1918026 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1922887 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1925512 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1926044 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1926202 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1926246 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1926759 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1941 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1955 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1967248 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2035 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2072564 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2078 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2089 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2101 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2119 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2122 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2123 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2127 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2136 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2156 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2175 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2208 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2302 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2304 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2309 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2317 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2318 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2319 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2336 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2353 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2372 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2373 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2374 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2375 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2376 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2386 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2410 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2419 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2422 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2474 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2483 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2485 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2486 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2495 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2497 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2498 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2499 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2500 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2504 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2505 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2525 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2536 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2580 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2590 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2592 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2595 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2596 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2598 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/261 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2628 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/263 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2647 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2655 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/266 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2672 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2683 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2696 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2738 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/275 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/276 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2761 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2775 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/280 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2802 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2825 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2846 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2865 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/2971 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/306 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/311 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/312 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/333 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/361 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/364 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/381 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/390 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/419 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/422 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/427 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/442 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/447 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/456 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/494 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/508 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/514 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/562107 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/577 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/578 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/579 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/616 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/625 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/633 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/654 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/690 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/693 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/697 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/704 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/714 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/739785 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/754 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/796480 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/799 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/805 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/817 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/824 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/826 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/829 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/833 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/834 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/837 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/886621 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/909 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/911 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/922 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/927 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/947 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/95 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/952 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/984 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/998 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1012 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1086 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1102 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1143 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1246990 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1267 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1319100 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1346769 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1346784 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1594394 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1605443 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1617929 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1623020 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1650 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1659901 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1671 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1701821 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1701971 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1715162 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1727737 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1735384 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1736 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1737444 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1738545 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1756927 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1761535 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1765970 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1774149 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1779634 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1808563 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1813398 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1814128 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1832353 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1836558 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1840922 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1857 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1860610 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1880225 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1884719 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1895305 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1907817 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1910 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1915531 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1930 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1936977 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1952 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/1953 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/2082 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/2083 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/2168 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/2170 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/2248 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/2333 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/2371 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/2390 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/2446 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/2460 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/2487 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/2560 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/2632 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/324 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/618 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/645662 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/698 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/856 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/866 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/904308 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/939 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/967 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/runtime/979 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1007 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1010 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1022 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1033 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1044 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1051 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1075272 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1111 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1172613 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1187319 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1238 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1261 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1267955 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/127 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1294898 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1361 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/140 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1470170 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1478 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1512 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1516408 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1550503 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1606 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1643619 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1667401 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1689367 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1704638 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1716292 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1728116 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1734792 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1760 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1763536 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1785203 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1785734 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1791796 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1799200 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1819 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1821006 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1858461 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1861341 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1861605 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1873898 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1876373 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1886097 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1893010 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1894361 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1895 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1908551 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1909 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1926521 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1926996 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/1927530 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/2027 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/2112 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/2157 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/2197 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/2203 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/2223 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/2262 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/2448 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/2553 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/2569 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/2604 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/2606 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/2619 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/2730 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/2815 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/2878 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/326 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/355 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/356 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/385 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/449 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/470 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/570 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/602 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/695 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/754635 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/836 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/871 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/885 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/890 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/957 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/982 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/syscall/993 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1012 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1086 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1102 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1143 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1246990 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1267 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1319100 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1346769 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1346784 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1594394 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1605443 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1617929 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1623020 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1650 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1659901 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1671 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1701821 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1701971 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1715162 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1727737 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1735384 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1736 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1737444 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1738545 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1756927 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1761535 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1765970 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1774149 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1779634 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1808563 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1813398 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1814128 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1832353 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1836558 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1840922 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1857 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1860610 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1880225 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1884719 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1895305 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1907817 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1910 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1915531 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1930 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1936977 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1952 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/1953 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/2082 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/2083 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/2168 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/2170 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/2248 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/2333 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/2371 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/2390 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/2446 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/2460 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/2487 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/2560 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/2632 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/324 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/618 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/645662 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/698 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/856 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/866 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/904308 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/939 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/967 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/runtime/979 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1007 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1010 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1022 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1033 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1044 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1051 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1075272 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1111 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1172613 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1187319 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1238 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1261 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1267955 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/127 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1294898 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1361 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/140 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1470170 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1478 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1512 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1516408 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1550503 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1606 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1643619 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1667401 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1689367 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1704638 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1716292 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1728116 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1734792 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1760 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1763536 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1785203 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1785734 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1791796 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1799200 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1819 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1821006 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1858461 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1861341 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1861605 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1873898 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1876373 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1886097 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1893010 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1894361 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1895 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1908551 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1909 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1926521 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1926996 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/1927530 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/2027 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/2112 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/2157 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/2197 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/2203 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/2223 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/2262 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/2448 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/2553 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/2569 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/2604 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/2606 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/2619 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/2730 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/2815 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/2878 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/326 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/355 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/356 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/385 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/449 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/470 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/570 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/602 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/695 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/754635 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/836 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/871 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/885 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/890 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/957 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/982 create mode 100644 results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/syscall/993 (limited to 'results/classifier') diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/categories.csv b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/categories.csv index a66597726..157a3848a 100644 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/categories.csv +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/categories.csv @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ category, count instruction, 156 -manual-review, 40 runtime, 273 -syscall, 74 +manual-review, 1 +syscall, 113 diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1033 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1033 deleted file mode 100644 index 3824e028a..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1033 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,13 +0,0 @@ - -Okay, so I need to figure out what category this bug falls into. The problem is that when running fakeroot under qemu, it fails with an error about semop(1) not being implemented. From the description, it looks like someone tried to fix a similar issue in another bug report but is still having problems. - -The user mentions they built qemu from the latest git repo, which should include the previous fix. They set up an schroot environment for arm architecture and run fakeroot as part of building a package. The error occurs during this process. - -So, looking at the possible categories: instruction, syscall, runtime. The error message specifically mentions 'semop(1): encountered an error: Function not implemented'. Semop is a system call used for semaphore operations. Since it's saying the function isn't implemented, that points to a problem with how qemu handles syscalls. - -Therefore, this issue relates to a problem during a system call within qemu. So the category should be 'syscall'. - - -The bug report discusses an error with the semop syscall not being implemented in qemu. This indicates a problem with handling system calls. - -sys \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1054831 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1054831 deleted file mode 100644 index 7fec8da36..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1054831 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,31 +0,0 @@ - -Okay, I'm trying to help classify this bug report related to QEMU. Let me go through it step by step. - -So, the user is setting up a sparc chroot on a Debian x86-64 host system. They followed the usual steps: creating a directory, using debootstrap with --foreign for sparc architecture, copying the qemu-sparc32plus-static binary into the chroot's /usr/bin, and then trying to run the second stage of debootstrap inside the chroot. - -When they execute the command `sudo chroot sparc/ /usr/bin/qemu-sparc32plus-static /bin/bash`, it seems to work initially. But when running `/debootstrap/debootstrap --second-stage`, they encounter an error: `bash: fork: Invalid argument`. - -The user mentioned that this process works perfectly for armhf, but not for sparc32plus. They're using the current QEMU git HEAD at commit 93b65997. - -I need to figure out what's causing this issue and classify it under one of the given categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. - -First, I should understand what "fork: Invalid argument" means. The fork() system call is used by a process to create a new child process. If fork returns an error like "Invalid argument", that suggests something's wrong with how the process is trying to fork. - -Looking deeper, when using QEMU user mode (like qemu-sparc32plus-static), it translates system calls from the guest architecture (sparc) to the host's (x86-64). If there's a problem in this translation layer, especially around system calls like fork, that could cause such errors. - -In this case, since armhf works fine but sparc doesn't, it points towards an issue specific to how QEMU is handling sparc32plus syscalls. Maybe the implementation of fork() isn't correctly handled for sparc in QEMU user mode. - -So, considering the categories: - -- **Instruction**: This would relate to a faulty instruction being executed. But here, the error is about a system call (fork) failing. - -- **Syscall**: Since the problem occurs at the syscall level with fork(), this seems relevant. The issue might be in how QEMU translates or handles the fork() call for sparc32plus. - -- **Runtime**: This could cover other runtime errors, but since it's specifically a system call failure, 'syscall' is more precise. - -Therefore, I think the category here is 'syscall'. - - -The error occurs during a system call (fork), indicating an issue with how QEMU handles this syscall for sparc32plus. - -syscal \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1066909 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1066909 deleted file mode 100644 index c92b37018..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1066909 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,18 +0,0 @@ - -Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report about QEMU's microblaze emulator having an issue with CLONE_THREAD. The user is saying that when they use CLONE_THREAD, the new process starts at the system call instruction instead of the next one, causing threads to multiply and crash quickly. - -First, I need to understand what category this falls under: instruction, syscall, or runtime. - -The bug is related to how QEMU handles the clone system call specifically for creating threads on microblaze. The problem isn't about executing an incorrect instruction but rather about the behavior of a system call (clone) not working as expected. So it's more than just a faulty instruction; it's about the handling of a syscall. - -Looking at the possible categories: -- Instruction: Faulty instructions, which doesn't seem to be the case here. -- Syscall: Errors related to how system calls are handled. -- Runtime: Other runtime errors not covered by the above two. - -Since the issue is specifically with the clone syscall and how it's emulated, leading to incorrect thread creation behavior, this falls under 'syscall'. - - -The bug report describes an error in handling the CLONE_THREAD system call within QEMU's microblaze emulator. It's a problem with the syscall emulation rather than an instruction or general runtime issue. - -sys \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1075272 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1075272 deleted file mode 100644 index f212b4169..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1075272 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,19 +0,0 @@ - -Okay, so I'm looking at this bug report about QEMU and socket type mapping issues for MIPS app-level emulation. The user is saying that when an application makes a socket call like socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP), it ends up using SOCK_DGRAM instead, which causes an error. - -The problem arises because in the do_socket function within syscall.c, there's a remapping happening to handle how MIPS permutes socket types. However, this remapping doesn't account for additional flags like SOCK_NONBLOCK or SOCK_CLOEXEC that might be OR'ed with the type. So when these flags are present, they interfere with the permutation logic, leading to incorrect socket calls and errors. - -I need to classify this bug into one of three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. - -First, considering "instruction" would mean it's about a specific CPU instruction being handled incorrectly. But here, the issue is about system calls and their parameters, not about executing an instruction. - -Next, looking at "runtime", which covers errors that happen during execution but aren't necessarily related to syscalls or instructions. However, the problem described is directly tied to how a syscall (socket) is being handled. - -The third option is "syscall", which refers to issues with system calls. Since the bug report discusses incorrect handling of socket types in the do_socket function, which processes the socket syscall, this seems like it fits under the syscall category. - -Therefore, the appropriate classification for this bug should be "syscall". - - -The issue pertains to how QEMU handles the socket system call parameters, specifically failing to account for certain flags when remapping socket types. This falls under incorrect handling of a system call. - -syscalls \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1075339 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1075339 deleted file mode 100644 index 0b29cbb81..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1075339 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,19 +0,0 @@ - -Okay, I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report about QEMU's setsockopt handling. The user mentioned that when using Linux-user emulation in QEMU, the setsockopt function ignores the optlen argument. Instead, it treats the argument as a 4-byte integer. This is causing issues because some socket options, like timeouts, require larger structures such as timeval which can be 8 or 16 bytes depending on the word size. - -So, I need to determine whether this bug falls under the 'instruction', 'syscall', or 'runtime' category. Let's break it down: - -1. **Instruction Category**: This would involve issues with specific CPU instructions or assembly-level problems. The report doesn't mention any instruction-level errors, so probably not this one. - -2. **Syscall Category**: This relates to issues with system calls in the operating system. Since setsockopt is a system call and the problem is about how QEMU handles it during emulation, especially ignoring optlen and incorrectly treating the argument as a 4-byte int, this seems relevant. The issue is about handling a specific syscall parameter improperly. - -3. **Runtime Category**: This would cover other runtime errors not related to instructions or syscalls. While the bug does cause runtime problems (like incorrect timeouts), the root cause is in how the syscall is handled by QEMU's emulation layer. - -Considering that the problem directly involves the setsockopt system call and its arguments, it makes sense to classify this under 'syscall'. The issue arises from improper handling of the syscall parameters during emulation. - - -The bug report discusses an issue with the `setsockopt` system call in QEMU's Linux-user emulation. It incorrectly handles the `optlen` argument by treating it as a 4-byte integer, which causes problems for socket options requiring larger data structures like `timeval`. This directly relates to how the syscall is implemented and handled. - -**syscall** - -The bug pertains to incorrect handling of a system call parameter in QEMU's emulation. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/122 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/122 deleted file mode 100644 index 0f57695a2..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/122 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,15 +0,0 @@ - -Okay, I need to classify this bug report for QEMU. The issue mentioned is "linux-user does not check PROT_EXEC". Let me break it down. - -First, I remember that QEMU has different modes, including user mode emulation (linux-user) which allows running binaries from one OS on another. So the problem is in that part of QEMU. - -The term PROT_EXEC refers to a memory protection flag used in syscalls like mmap or mprotect. It allows execution of code in that memory region. If linux-user isn't checking this, it might lead to security issues because it could allow executing unauthorized code. - -Now, looking at the categories: instruction, syscall, runtime. This issue is about how QEMU handles PROT_EXEC in user mode. It's more about how the emulation interacts with system calls and memory protections rather than a specific instruction or runtime error elsewhere. - -So, the problem relates to syscalls and how they're handled. Therefore, it falls under 'syscall'. - - -The bug report pertains to the handling of PROT_EXEC within the linux-user mode of QEMU, which affects how system calls related to memory protection are managed. - -syscalls \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/127 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/127 deleted file mode 100644 index 283b562f6..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/127 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,18 +0,0 @@ - -Okay, I'm looking at this bug report for QEMU that says "linux-user missing cmsg IP_PKTINFO support ('Unsupported ancillary data: 0/8')". The user is asking me to classify this bug into one of three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. - -First, I need to understand what the issue is. Ancillary data in networking refers to additional information that can be sent along with a message, such as source routing or packet info. In Linux, IP_PKTINFO is used to get information about the incoming packet's interface and address. - -The error message suggests that when trying to handle this ancillary data, QEMU is encountering an unsupported case. Specifically, it's not handling cmsg (control messages) related to IP_PKTINFO. Since this relates to how network packets are processed, especially their metadata, it's likely a system call issue because socket operations involve syscalls like recvmsg which deal with control messages. - -Looking at the categories: -- Instruction: This would relate to specific CPU instructions or assembly code errors, which doesn't seem to be the case here. -- Syscall: Errors related to how system calls are handled. Since this involves networking and ancillary data, which is part of socket syscalls, this seems relevant. -- Runtime: General runtime errors not tied to a specific instruction or syscall. - -Given that the issue is about handling control messages during socket operations, it's more aligned with a syscall error because QEMU might be mishandling how these system calls are implemented in its user-mode emulation. Therefore, the category should be 'syscall'. - - -The bug report pertains to handling ancillary data during socket operations, which involves system calls. - -syscalls \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1394 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1394 deleted file mode 100644 index 7084e41ec..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1394 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,15 +0,0 @@ - -Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let me read through the problem description carefully. - -The issue is about getresuid() returning incorrect uid values when run in a big-endian sparc64 guest under QEMU. The user provided an example where UID 0x000003e8 becomes 0x03e80000, which looks like a byte-swapping issue. - -From the steps to reproduce, they're compiling and running code that uses getresuid(). They mention it doesn't happen outside QEMU, so it's likely related to how QEMU handles something. The problem occurs when calling getresuid(), which is a system call. - -Looking at possible causes: since this affects a system call, it might be an issue in how QEMU translates or handles that particular syscall. Alternatively, maybe the glibc implementation within QEMU isn't handling endianness correctly, but since they mention it's part of QEMU, I should focus there. - -So, considering the problem is with getresuid(), which is a syscall, and the error occurs in the context of QEMU emulating that call. Therefore, this falls under the 'syscall' category because the issue arises when making a system call within the emulator. - - -The bug report describes an incorrect handling of the getresuid() system call, leading to byte-swapping issues. This is related to how the syscall is implemented or translated by QEMU. - -syscalls \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1416988 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1416988 deleted file mode 100644 index 4658b4ca4..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1416988 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,17 +0,0 @@ - -Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let's break it down step by step. - -The user is experiencing issues when running GCC tests under qemu-aarch64. The problem seems to be related to signal handling, specifically a segmentation fault and infinite loops in certain test cases. They noticed that the sizes of siginfo structures between the Linux kernel and QEMU differ: 136 vs. 128 bytes. - -The user identified that the issue arises from an incorrect definition of TARGET_SI_PAD_SIZE in QEMU's syscall_defs.h. In the kernel, this is calculated as (SI_MAX_SIZE - __ARCH_SI_PREAMBLE_SIZE) divided by sizeof(int), which for Aarch64 is 4 * sizeof(int). So the padding size would be adjusted accordingly to fit within SI_MAX_SIZE. - -In contrast, QEMU currently defines TARGET_SI_PAD_SIZE as (TARGET_SI_MAX_SIZE / sizeof(int)) - 3. This leads to a larger pad than necessary because it doesn't account for the preambles correctly, causing the structures to be misaligned and mismatched between host and target. - -This seems to affect how signals are handled when running user space applications under QEMU. Since it's about handling signals, which involves system calls (like sigreturn or rt_sigreturn), I think this falls under a syscall issue because the problem occurs during signal processing, which relies on syscalls for communication between userland and the kernel. - -So, putting it all together, the bug is related to how QEMU handles system calls involving signal information structures. The incorrect padding size leads to ABI incompatibility, causing segmentation faults when applications try to use these signals. Therefore, this should be classified under 'syscall'. - - -The issue stems from a miscalculation of the pad size for siginfo structures in QEMU's syscall handling, leading to an ABI mismatch with the Linux kernel. This affects signal processing and is related to system calls. - -syscalls \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1643619 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1643619 deleted file mode 100644 index 3472a039a..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1643619 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,17 +0,0 @@ - -Alright, I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report as either an instruction, syscall, or runtime issue within QEMU. - -The problem described is that netlink is broken on big-endian MIPS when using qemu-user. The user ran 'ip route' in a Debian chroot and it hung. They provided strace output showing that the process was waiting for a netlink response which never came. - -Looking at the strace, I see that the sendto call includes a buffer with len=671088640, which is 0x28000000 in hex. This looks like it's been byteswapped because on big-endian systems, byte order matters differently than on little-endian. The user mentioned that by removing the call to fd_trans_unregister in do_syscall for NR_socket, the issue was fixed. - -The bug seems related to how file descriptors are being translated or handled when making syscalls. Specifically, after creating a socket (which is a syscall), the code immediately unregisters the translation of the file descriptor. This could cause issues if other parts of the system expect that translation to still be in place for subsequent operations like sendto. - -So this isn't an instruction-level bug because it's not about specific CPU instructions or assembly code. It's also not a runtime issue in the sense of general execution problems. Instead, it's about how syscalls (in this case, socket) are being handled and their related file descriptor translations. The problem arises from the way the system calls interact with the file descriptors, specifically when dealing with endianness. - -Therefore, the category should be 'syscall' because it relates to errors in handling system calls within QEMU. - - -The bug is classified under 'syscall' as it involves an error related to system call handling, particularly with file descriptor translations and netlink communication on big-endian MIPS. - -syscalls \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1673976 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1673976 deleted file mode 100644 index 035e5d3e9..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1673976 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,23 +0,0 @@ - -Okay, so I need to figure out how to classify this bug report into one of the three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let's break down what the problem is here. - -The user is running locale-gen inside an armv7h chroot on their x86_64 desktop using qemu-arm-static. They've been doing this successfully for years but started having issues in the last few months, possibly after updating to QEMU 2.8. The error they're encountering is a core dump from localedef, which says there's an assertion failure in glibc's spawni.c file at line 360: `__spawnix: Assertion 'ec >= 0' failed.` - -The first thing I notice is that the issue involves using qemu to run an ARM binary on an x86_64 system. The problem arises during a locale generation process, which suggests it's related to how the environment or binaries are being handled within the chroot. - -Looking at the error message, it points to glibc's posix_spawn function having an assertion failure. Specifically, `ec >= 0` is failing, meaning that some value expected to be non-negative isn't, causing the program to abort. - -Now, considering the possible categories: - -1. **Instruction**: This would involve issues with specific machine instructions not being handled correctly by QEMU. If QEMU was mis-emulating an ARM instruction, that could cause problems. However, the error here is about a system call failure in glibc, which is more about how the process is being spawned. - -2. **Syscall**: Errors related to system calls would involve issues with how QEMU translates or handles system calls from the guest environment to the host. Since posix_spawn involves making system calls (like spawn), if QEMU isn't handling them correctly, that could cause such an error. - -3. **Runtime**: This category covers other runtime errors not specifically tied to instructions or syscalls. However, in this case, it seems like a specific issue with how processes are spawned, which ties back into system call handling. - -Given the context, the problem is likely due to how QEMU handles the posix_spawn syscall when running armv7h binaries on an x86_64 host. The assertion failure suggests that the environment or arguments passed during the spawn are incorrect, possibly because QEMU isn't correctly emulating or translating the necessary system calls for this operation. - -Therefore, I would classify this issue under **syscall** because it's related to how system calls, specifically posix_spawn, are handled by QEMU in the emulation process. - - -sys \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1701973 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1701973 deleted file mode 100644 index 722d0e01f..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1701973 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,19 +0,0 @@ - -Okay, so I'm looking at this bug report where pread isn't working correctly under qemu-sh4. Let me try to understand what's going on here. - -First, the user provided a test program that uses the pread system call. When they run it under qemu-sh4 version 2.9.0, instead of getting ret=1 with errno=0 as expected, they're getting ret=0 and errno=2. This is causing an assertion failure because the code expects ret to be 1. - -I know that pread is a system call used for reading from a file descriptor at a specific position without updating the file pointer. So, if it's returning 0 instead of 1, something's wrong with how many bytes were read or perhaps an error occurred. - -The error number 2 corresponds to ENOENT, which usually means "No such file or directory." But in this context, since we're using a file descriptor, maybe the issue isn't about the file not existing but rather some problem in handling the pread call itself. - -Looking at the steps provided: they compile the program with static linking and run it under qemu. The fact that the program is statically linked might mean that it's using its own C library, which could affect how system calls are handled by qemu. - -The possible categories to classify this bug are instruction, syscall, or runtime. Since pread is a system call and the issue arises when calling it, it seems like the problem lies in how qemu handles this particular syscall. Maybe there's an incorrect implementation of the pread function in qemu-sh4, leading to the wrong return value and error code. - -I don't see any mention of faulty instructions or other runtime errors beyond the syscall failure. So, the most fitting category here is 'syscall' because it's directly related to how the system call is processed by the emulator. - - -The bug report describes an issue with the pread system call returning incorrect values under qemu-sh4, which falls under handling of a system call. - -syscalls \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1729 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1729 deleted file mode 100644 index 1431a9efa..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1729 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,18 +0,0 @@ - -Okay, so I need to figure out how to classify this bug report as either 'instruction', 'syscall', or 'runtime'. Let's break it down step by step. - -The problem occurs when running a 32-bit program on a 64-bit host using qemu-user-static. The issue is with the `mremap` function in the musl-libc library. Specifically, when `pthread_getattr_np` is called, it enters an infinite loop because `mremap` keeps failing with `EFAULT`. - -Looking at the code snippet provided, the while loop in `pthread_getattr_np.c` uses `mremap` and checks if it returns `MAP_FAILED` due to `ENOMEM`. The problem arises when `mremap` fails for a different reason, causing the loop to repeat indefinitely. - -The key points here are: -1. It's related to a system call (`mremap`). -2. The failure is due to an error condition (`EFAULT`) that isn't properly handled. -3. This issue happens at runtime when the program is executed under qemu-user-static. - -Since `mremap` is a syscall, and the problem stems from how it's being handled or called, the category should be 'syscall'. It's not about an incorrect instruction or a general runtime error but specifically about a syscall failing unexpectedly. - - -The bug report involves an issue with the `mremap` system call causing unexpected behavior when running under qemu-user-static. The problem arises from how the syscall is being handled, leading to an infinite loop. - -sys \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1734792 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1734792 deleted file mode 100644 index 9f9372355..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1734792 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,17 +0,0 @@ - -Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. The issue is that QEMU isn't supporting the memfd_create syscall, resulting in an error when a userspace application uses it. - -First, looking at what each category entails: - -- **Instruction**: This would involve issues with how instructions are handled by the CPU emulator in QEMU. For example, if a specific instruction causes a problem. -- **Syscall**: This relates to system calls that the guest OS makes which aren't properly handled by QEMU's user mode emulation. -- **Runtime**: Covers other runtime errors not related to instructions or syscalls. - -The bug report mentions that memfd_create is failing with an error "Unsupported syscall: 319". The number 319 corresponds to the syscall number for memfd_create in Linux. Since this is a system call issue where QEMU doesn't support it, the problem falls under the syscall category. - -So, the classification should be 'syscall' because it's about handling a specific system call that isn't implemented. - - -The bug report describes an issue with QEMU not supporting the memfd_create syscall, which is a system call error. - -sys \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1760 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1760 deleted file mode 100644 index 8be0f305c..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1760 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,22 +0,0 @@ - -Okay, I'm trying to classify this bug report about qemu8-i386 not handling the mmap syscall correctly for 32-bit applications. Let me go through the details step by step. - -First, the problem occurs when running an oldmmap program under QEMU. The strace output shows that the correct arguments are being passed to the mmap system call, but QEMU's -strace is showing different and incorrect arguments. For example, in the user's example, strace reports mmap with NULL as the address, 8192 bytes, etc., while QEMU reports something like 0x40800058 as the first argument. - -Looking at the code provided, the oldmmap.S file uses inline assembly to push the arguments onto the stack for the syscall. The order of pushing is important because syscalls in Linux traditionally use this method. So, the user's program pushes the offset (0), fd (-1), flags (MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS), protection (PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE), length (8192, which is 2<<12), and address (0) onto the stack, then sets ebx to esp pointing to this array of arguments. Eax is set to _NR_mmap (90). - -Now, in QEMU's output, it's interpreting the mmap syscall with different arguments: (0x40800058, 0, PROT_NONE, ...). This suggests that either the order of the arguments is incorrect or they're being read from the wrong place. - -The key point here is how syscalls are handled in QEMU. For i386, the old syscall convention uses eax for the number and then pushes the arguments onto the stack. However, newer methods might use different registers. But since _NR_mmap is 90, which was an older syscall number (in some contexts, it's now higher on x86_64), this implies that the code is using the i386 syscall convention. - -QEMU should correctly interpret the stack arguments when emulating the old syscalls. If QEMU isn't decoding them properly, it might be because of a bug in how it reads the stack for these specific syscalls or perhaps an issue with register handling. - -The user mentioned that this is happening on 32-bit mode, so it's not a problem related to instruction encoding but more about how system calls are parsed. Since the issue is specifically about the arguments passed to mmap (a system call), and not about executing instructions incorrectly or runtime errors elsewhere, this falls under a syscall category. - -Therefore, I classify this bug as 'syscall' because it involves incorrect handling of the system call arguments by QEMU's emulator. - - -The issue arises from QEMU improperly decoding the stack-based arguments for the mmap syscall, leading to incorrect strace output. This is related to how syscalls are handled in the emulator. - -**Answer:** -sys \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1761153 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1761153 deleted file mode 100644 index 61a164cac..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1761153 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,21 +0,0 @@ - -Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report related to QEMU. Let me read through it carefully and understand what's going on here. - -The issue is about mmap behaving incorrectly when dealing with large files on a 64-bit host running a 32-bit executable via QEMU. The user provided a test program, `test_mmap.c`, which they compiled as a 32-bit binary. When they run it under qemu-i386, the output is "Incorrect data 1", indicating that something went wrong with the mmap operation. - -The problem seems to occur when the offset exceeds 4GiB, which makes sense because 32-bit systems can't address more than that due to their limited pointer size. So, when trying to mmap a file beyond 4GB on a 64-bit host using a 32-bit guest executable via QEMU, it's failing. - -Looking at the possible categories: instruction, syscall, runtime. The user is asking which category this bug falls into. Let me think about each possibility. - -First, "instruction" would imply that there's an issue with how specific instructions are handled by QEMU. This doesn't seem to be the case here since the problem isn't about executing a particular opcode incorrectly but rather handling file mappings. - -Next, "syscall": this relates to errors when making system calls. Mmap is indeed a system call (sys_mmap), so if QEMU is mishandling it, especially across 32/64-bit boundaries, that would fit here. The issue arises during the mmap operation, which involves handling pointers and addresses correctly between different architectures. - -Lastly, "runtime" is for other runtime errors not covered by instructions or syscalls. Since this seems tied to how system calls are emulated, especially involving address spaces and memory mappings, it's more likely a syscall issue rather than a general runtime problem. - -Putting it all together: the bug is related to QEMU's handling of mmap syscalls when the guest is 32-bit and the host is 64-bit. Therefore, this should be categorized under "syscall". - - -The bug relates to how QEMU handles the mmap system call across different architectures, specifically between a 64-bit host and a 32-bit guest executable. - -syscalls \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1783362 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1783362 deleted file mode 100644 index 53f2a12a9..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1783362 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,19 +0,0 @@ - -Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report related to QEMU. The issue is that when using mmap with len==0 on an ARM64 binary running under QEMU on an x86_64 host, it returns success (NULL, 0) instead of failure (MAP_FAILED, -1). - -First, I need to understand what the problem is. Mmap is a system call used for memory mapping files or allocating anonymous memory. According to the POSIX standard, if len is zero, mmap should return MAP_FAILED and set errno to EINVAL. But in this case, under QEMU's user emulation, it returns NULL and 0, which suggests a success, but that's incorrect. - -The user provided steps to reproduce the issue. They compiled a test program for ARM64 using a cross-compiler and ran it on an x86_64 host with QEMU-user. The program asserts that mmap should return MAP_FAILED when len is zero, but under QEMU, it doesn't, causing the assertion to fail. - -Looking at the possible categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. - -"Instruction" would be if there was a problem with how an instruction was handled by the emulator. "Syscall" relates directly to system calls not behaving as expected, which seems to fit here because mmap is a syscall and it's returning incorrect values. "Runtime" might involve other issues during execution that aren't tied to specific instructions or syscalls. - -Since the issue revolves around how QEMU handles the mmap system call when len is zero, this points towards a problem in the syscall handling within QEMU. The bug is specifically about the behavior of mmap, which is a syscall, so it's likely categorized under "syscall." - -Additionally, the fact that running on a native ARM64 host works correctly (returns -1 and sets errno to 22) indicates that QEMU's emulation isn't correctly handling this edge case. This further supports the idea that the issue lies in how the syscall is being emulated by QEMU. - - -The bug pertains to incorrect behavior of the mmap system call under QEMU when len is zero, which falls under the "syscall" category. - -syscalls \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1805913 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1805913 deleted file mode 100644 index cab4fac7f..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1805913 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,22 +0,0 @@ - -Okay, I'm trying to classify this bug report into one of the given categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let me break it down step by step. - -The issue is that when running 32-bit user-static QEMU on a 64-bit host, the readdir() function returns NULL with errno=EOVERFLOW. From the provided code and explanation, I understand that this happens because the inode numbers returned by getdents64 (a syscall) are 64-bit values, but in a 32-bit environment, these can't fit into the 32-bit DIR* structure expected by readdir(). The glibc code is checking for this overflow and throwing EOVERFLOW. - -So, what's happening here? The problem arises when the user-space application (compiled for 32-bit) interacts with the kernel (64-bit). The QEMU emulator is supposed to handle this translation, but it's not doing so properly. Specifically, it's passing through the 64-bit inode numbers directly without converting them to a compatible 32-bit format. - -Looking at the categories: - -1. Instruction: This would relate to issues with CPU instructions or assembly-level problems. I don't think that's the case here; the problem is more about data handling between different architectures. - -2. Syscall: Since the issue involves syscalls like getdents64, which are being called from user-space into the kernel, and how their results are handled by QEMU. The problem occurs during the processing of these syscalls. - -3. Runtime: This would cover issues that happen during program execution but aren't directly tied to instruction-level or syscall handling. However, in this case, the issue is specifically about how QEMU handles a syscall result, which makes it more about syscall processing rather than a general runtime error. - -So, considering that the bug report is about QEMU not correctly translating or handling 64-bit syscalls for a 32-bit environment, especially with getdents64, this falls under the 'syscall' category. It's an issue in how QEMU manages system calls and their data when emulating a different architecture. - - -The bug report is about how QEMU handles a syscall (getdents64) for a 32-bit application on a 64-bit host, leading to an EOVERFLOW error because of incompatible data types. This is categorized under 'syscall' as it involves system call handling and translation between architectures. - -**Answer:** -syscal \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1810433 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1810433 deleted file mode 100644 index 5fb84ffb5..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1810433 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,19 +0,0 @@ - -Okay, so I'm looking at this bug report about qemu-aarch64-linux-user having inconsistent pwrite behavior. The user provided a minimal test case where they open a file, fallocate some space, and then call pwrite with buf as NULL and len as 0. They noticed that on native x86_64 and aarch64 systems, pwrite returns 0, but when running under qemu-aarch64, it returns -1 instead. - -Hmm, the first thing I need to figure out is why this discrepancy exists. Let me recall what pwrite does. According to the man page, pwrite writes up to len bytes from the buffer starting at buf into the file descriptor fd at offset off. If len is 0, then no bytes are written, but according to POSIX, it should return 0 in that case. - -Wait, so both native systems are returning 0 when len is 0, regardless of whether buf is NULL or not? That's correct behavior because writing zero bytes doesn't require accessing the buffer. So passing a NULL buffer shouldn't matter since no data is copied from it. - -Now, looking at the qemu setup: they're using the aarch64-linux-user target and the specific commit 20d6c7312f1b812bb9c750f4087f69ac8485cc90. The issue is that pwrite returns -1 in this environment, which suggests an error occurred. But according to the function's specs, it shouldn't fail when len is 0. - -I need to determine where the problem lies. Since the behavior is different from the native systems, it's likely a bug in how qemu handles the pwrite syscall for aarch64 targets. Maybe there's an issue with the emulation of the pwrite call in that specific target. - -Looking at the possible categories: instruction, syscall, runtime. The problem is about the handling of the pwrite system call returning an incorrect value under certain conditions. This points towards it being a syscall-related issue because it's how the system call is emulated that's causing the discrepancy. - -So the category should be "syscall". - - -The bug report describes an inconsistency in how the `pwrite` system call is handled by `qemu-aarch64-linux-user`. The native systems return 0 when `len` is 0, while qemu returns -1. This indicates a problem with the syscall emulation. - -sys \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1837 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1837 deleted file mode 100644 index a4ba1049a..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1837 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,11 +0,0 @@ - -Alright, I'm looking at this bug report about QEMU not supporting the IP_MULTICAST_IF socket option. The user provided a test program that uses setsockopt to try setting this option on a UDP socket under QEMU's aarch64-static environment. They're getting an error saying "Protocol not available," which suggests that the system call isn't handling this particular socket option correctly. - -First, I need to classify this bug into one of the given categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. The issue here is with how the setsockopt system call is being handled within QEMU's user-mode emulation. The test program is using a standard system call (setsockopt) that's failing because QEMU doesn't support IP_MULTICAST_IF. - -So, this isn't an issue with an instruction execution but rather how a system call is implemented in QEMU. The problem arises during the runtime when trying to execute this specific syscall. Therefore, it falls under the 'syscall' category because the bug is related to the incorrect handling or absence of support for a particular system call within the emulator. - - -The bug report pertains to an issue with how the setsockopt system call is handled in QEMU's user-mode emulation. Since the problem arises from the unsupported IP_MULTICAST_IF socket option, it falls under the category of a system call error. - -syscalls \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1869073 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1869073 deleted file mode 100644 index 4d8d5dd16..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1869073 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,25 +0,0 @@ - -Okay, so I'm trying to figure out why qemu-arm-static crashes with a segmentation fault when running "git clone -s". The user wants me to classify this bug as either instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let's break it down step by step. - -First, what is qemu-arm-static? It's a QEMU emulator for ARM architecture, static binary version. It allows running ARM binaries on an x86 host. In this case, the user is using it to cross-compile software via distcc, which distributes compilation tasks across multiple machines or cores. - -Now, when they run a script that uses "git clone -s", qemu crashes with a segmentation fault. Alternatively, sometimes git just hangs with 100% CPU usage. So this happens reliably every time the script tries to execute that git command under qemu-arm-static. - -Segmentation faults usually occur due to invalid memory accesses—like trying to read or write memory that the program isn't allowed to access. This could be a bug in the emulator itself, or perhaps an issue with how certain system calls (syscalls) are handled when running foreign binaries. - -Looking at the possible categories: - -1. Instruction: This would involve a specific machine instruction causing issues. For example, if a particular ARM instruction isn't handled correctly by QEMU, it could crash. -2. Syscall: Problems with how system calls are implemented or handled in the emulator. If git is making a syscall that qemu-arm-static doesn't handle properly, this could lead to crashes. -3. Runtime: Other runtime errors not directly tied to instructions or syscalls, like memory management issues. - -Since "git clone -s" uses various system calls (like network operations, file I/O), it's likely that the issue is related to how QEMU handles these syscalls when emulating ARM on an x86 host. It might be that certain syscalls aren't properly translated or handled, leading to a segmentation fault. - -Alternatively, it could be a runtime error due to incorrect memory handling within the emulator when dealing with git's operations. However, since the crash happens specifically during a syscall-heavy operation like cloning a repository, I think the issue is more likely tied to how syscalls are being processed by qemu-arm-static. - -So, putting this together, the category would most likely be "syscall". - - -The issue occurs when handling system calls made by git clone, leading QEMU to crash. This points towards problems with syscall handling in the emulator. - -syscalls \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1869241 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1869241 deleted file mode 100644 index d872cd99f..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1869241 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,22 +0,0 @@ - -Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let's break down the problem step by step. - -The user is encountering an error when using svn checkout on an ARM7 system emulated via qemu-arm-static. The error message is "E000075 Can't read directory '...': Value too large for defined data type." This happens consistently during their autobuild process. - -First, I should consider what each category entails: -- **Instruction**: This would involve a problem with an individual CPU instruction. If qemu was misinterpreting or executing an ARM7 instruction incorrectly, that could cause issues. -- **Syscall**: This relates to system calls made by the emulated process. If qemu isn't handling a particular syscall correctly on the host (AMD64), it might lead to such errors. -- **Runtime**: This would be other runtime issues not directly tied to instructions or syscalls, perhaps related to memory management, resource limits, etc. - -Looking at the error message: "Value too large for defined data type." This typically occurs when a value exceeds the maximum size allowed by a variable's definition. In programming terms, this could happen if, for example, a function expects an integer but receives a larger value than it can handle. - -In the context of SVN operations, reading a directory might involve retrieving file metadata or listing entries. The error suggests that some value returned from the system is too large for what svn expects. Now, considering the emulation layer, qemu-arm-static runs ARM7 code on an AMD64 host. - -When emulating syscalls, qemu translates them between the target (ARM) and host (AMD64) architectures. If there's a mismatch in how certain values are handled during this translation—like file handles or directory descriptors being too large for what the target expects—it could cause such errors. - -So, the problem likely arises when qemu is handling syscalls related to directory operations. It might be that the emulation isn't correctly translating the sizes or types of these system calls, leading to svn receiving values it can't process. - -Therefore, this issue falls under the **syscall** category because it's related to how system calls are being handled by qemu during the emulation process. - - -syscal \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1910605 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1910605 deleted file mode 100644 index 8d12ad635..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1910605 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,21 +0,0 @@ - -Okay, so I'm trying to figure out this problem where using qemu-arm-static gives an error with ioctl USBDEVFS_BULK returning -1 and EFAULT (Bad address), but it works fine with qemu-aarch64-static. The user is running on a 64-bit Intel laptop. - -First, I need to understand what's going on here. The code snippet uses ioctl with the USBDEVFS_BULK command. The struct usbdevfs_bulktransfer is being set up, and then ioctl is called. On qemu-arm-static, this returns -1 with EFAULT, which usually means a bad address was accessed. But it works fine when using qemu-aarch64-static. - -Hmm, so why would the same code work on one emulator but not another? Let's think about the differences between arm and aarch64. ARM is 32-bit, while AArch64 is 64-bit. The user is running on a 64-bit Intel machine, so when they use qemu-aarch64-static, it's emulating a 64-bit system, which might be more straightforward because the host and guest are both 64-bit. But with qemu-arm-static, it's emulating a 32-bit ARM system on a 64-bit host. - -I remember that when dealing with pointers in 32-bit versus 64-bit environments, there can be issues with how addresses are handled. Maybe the struct usbdevfs_bulktransfer is being passed incorrectly in terms of alignment or size when running under the arm emulator. - -Looking at the code, Bulk.data is assigned (void *)pData. If pData isn't correctly aligned for a 32-bit pointer, or if there's an issue with how the data is copied between host and guest memory spaces, that could cause EFAULT. Another possibility is that the struct itself might have padding differences between 32-bit and 64-bit architectures, leading to misaligned data when passed into ioctl. - -Also, considering that qemu-arm-static is a user-mode emulator, it's possible there are issues with how syscalls like ioctl are handled in different modes (arm vs. aarch64). Maybe the syscall expects certain parameters or structures to be laid out differently for 32-bit compared to 64-bit, and in this case, the arm version isn't handling it correctly. - -So, putting this together, the issue seems related to how the ioctl system call is being handled by qemu-arm-static. It's causing a bad address error because of pointer or struct alignment issues specific to the 32-bit emulation on a 64-bit host. This points towards a syscall-related problem rather than an instruction-level fault or a runtime error elsewhere. - -Therefore, the category should be 'syscall' because it's related to how the ioctl system call is being executed and handled within the qemu-arm-static environment. - - -syscalls are involved in handling the ioctl command, leading to the EFAULT error. The issue arises from differences in pointer alignment between 32-bit and 64-bit environments. - -syscalls \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1926521 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1926521 deleted file mode 100644 index 5a8c91e73..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1926521 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,17 +0,0 @@ - -Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU. The issue is that when an application uses MADV_DONTNEED, QEMU isn't handling it correctly. Let me break down what's happening here. - -The user provided code where they map a page with MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, which means it's private and anonymous—so changes won't be reflected in any file. They write 'A' to the first byte of this mapped area. Then they call madvise with MADV_DONTNEED on that region. - -According to the man pages, after MADV_DONTNEED, accessing those pages should result in either reloading from a file (for shared mappings) or zero-filled pages for private anonymous mappings. In this case, since it's MAP_PRIVATE and anonymous, any access should get zeros because the OS can just drop the pages and refill them on next access with zeros. - -In the code, after calling madvise, they assert that *P is 0. On the host system, this works as expected, but when run under QEMU, it fails, meaning *P isn't zeroed out, causing an assertion failure. - -Looking at the QEMU code, in the syscall.c file, there's a comment saying MADV_DONTNEED is ignored because it's a hint. So QEMU just returns success without doing anything, which explains why the memory isn't cleared as expected. - -So this issue is about how QEMU handles a specific system call—madvise with MADV_DONTNEED. Since it's not correctly implementing the expected behavior of the madvise syscall, it falls under a syscall error category. - - -The bug report pertains to an incorrect handling of the `madvise` system call in QEMU when processing the `MADV_DONTNEED` advice, leading to unexpected memory behavior. - -**Answer:** The given bug is classified as a **syscall** issue. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2101 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2101 deleted file mode 100644 index 71d81c4a2..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2101 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,23 +0,0 @@ - -Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let me read through the problem description carefully. - -The user is running `qemu-x86_64` on an aarch64 platform and executing the 'ls' command. They're getting incorrect results when they run it. The steps involve copying the ls binary and its dependencies from x86_64 to aarch64, then using qemu to execute it. - -Hmm, so what's happening here? Since they're using QEMU to emulate an x86_64 environment on an aarch64 host, any issues could be related to how the emulator is handling system calls or instructions from the binary. - -The problem occurs when executing 'ls -l /'. The expected behavior is for ls to list the root directory's contents correctly. If it's giving wrong results, maybe it's not reading the filesystem properly or there's an issue with how QEMU is handling file operations. - -I should consider possible causes. One possibility is that the system calls made by 'ls' are not being translated correctly by QEMU. For example, if certain syscalls aren't handled properly in the emulator when running on aarch64, that could lead to incorrect outputs. Alternatively, it might be an issue with how QEMU handles the file descriptors or directory listings. - -Another angle is whether the dependencies of 'ls' are correctly set up. If any shared libraries required by 'ls' aren't present or are incompatible in the x86_64 root directory on the aarch64 host, that could cause unexpected behavior. But the user mentioned copying all necessary so files, so perhaps that's not the issue. - -Looking at the categories: instruction issues would relate to specific CPU instructions not being emulated correctly. Syscall issues would be about system calls failing or returning incorrect data. Runtime errors are more general and happen during execution but aren't tied to a specific cause like syscalls or instructions. - -In this case, since 'ls' is relying on the filesystem operations which involve syscalls like readdir, open, etc., it's likely that QEMU isn't correctly translating these syscalls when running in an emulated environment. If those syscalls aren't handled properly, the output from 'ls' would be wrong. - -Therefore, the most probable category is "syscall" because the issue seems to stem from incorrect handling of system calls made by the x86_64 binary on the aarch64 host via QEMU. - - -The issue likely arises from how QEMU handles system calls for file operations in an emulated environment. Incorrect syscall translation could cause 'ls' to produce wrong results. - -syscalls \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2122 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2122 deleted file mode 100644 index 87c5b4bae..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2122 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,15 +0,0 @@ - -Alright, I'm looking at this bug report about QEMU-user-static causing a segfault when running ldconfig on an x86_64 host with an arm64 client. The user provided steps to reproduce: downloading an Ubuntu Jammy arm64 rootfs, mounting it with /proc from the host, and then executing an apt uninstall that triggers libc-bin processing. - -Hmm, I need to classify this bug into one of three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let me think about each category. - -"Instruction" would involve a specific faulty command or instruction in the code causing the issue. "Syscall" relates to errors when interacting with system calls. "Runtime" is for other runtime errors that don't fall into the first two. - -In this case, the segfault occurs during the execution of ldconfig via apt processing. Since it's happening while running a process on the emulated arm64 environment, and given that QEMU-user-static handles CPU emulation, it's likely a problem with how system calls are being handled between the host and guest architectures. - -So, I think this is related to syscalls because ldconfig might be making certain system calls that aren't being translated correctly by QEMU. Therefore, the category should be "syscall." - - -The bug occurs during system call handling between the host and guest architectures when running ldconfig via apt. This points to a syscall-related issue. - -sys \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2262 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2262 deleted file mode 100644 index b3dea6272..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2262 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,17 +0,0 @@ - -Alright, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user is having an issue with QEMU's Linux-user mode emulation for RISC-V32. They mentioned that when they run background jobs in a chroot environment, the shell hangs indefinitely. - -Looking at the details, they provided two code examples: `simple_shell.c` and `loop.c`. From what I understand, the shell is supposed to handle background processes by using `wait4` or `waitpid`, but it's not working as expected on RISC-V32 under QEMU. - -The strace output shows that there are repeated calls to `waitid` with flags like WNOHANG, which means it's checking for any completed child processes without blocking. The fact that it returns 0 repeatedly suggests that no processes are completing or being signaled correctly, leading the shell to loop indefinitely. - -In their reproducer, they mention that when they run a background job (like `./loop &`), the shell incorrectly reports that the job is done and then gets stuck in an infinite loop. The output shows `wait4 ret: 98298`, which doesn't make sense because on x86_64 or RISC-V64, it should return 0. - -So, considering the categories provided—instruction, syscall, runtime—the issue seems to revolve around how QEMU is handling system calls related to process management. Specifically, `waitid` and `wait4` are syscalls that aren't behaving as expected under emulation for RISC-V32. This would fall under a problem with system call handling in QEMU. - -Therefore, the category should be 'syscall' because it's an error in how these particular syscalls are being processed. - - -The issue pertains to incorrect handling of `waitid` and `wait4` syscalls in QEMU's RISC-V32 emulation, causing background processes not to be managed properly. This is a system call-related problem. - -sys \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2333 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2333 deleted file mode 100644 index bd7b07487..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2333 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,23 +0,0 @@ - -Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let's break down what's happening here. - -The user is reporting that when they run their program under qemu-armeb (which emulates an ARM big-endian system), it crashes with a segmentation fault. They've identified that the issue occurs in the __clock_gettime64() function, specifically at line 42 of clock_gettime.c where it calls INTERNAL_VSYSCALL_CALL for vdso_time64. - -Looking at the stack trace, the crash happens during this VDSO call. The user also mentions that when they disable VDSO by rebuilding glibc without it, the problem goes away. This suggests that the issue is related to how QEMU handles the VDSO (Virtual Dynamic Shared Object) for ARM big-endian. - -VDSO is used to speed up certain system calls by handling them in userspace instead of making a full syscall into the kernel. If something's wrong with how QEMU implements this, it could cause crashes. - -The problem occurs only on qemu-armeb and not on qemu-arm (little endian), which indicates that there might be an endianness issue or some specific handling in QEMU for big-endian systems that isn't working correctly. - -Now, considering the categories: - -1. **Instruction**: This would involve a faulty instruction being executed. The crash is happening during a VDSO call, but it's not clear if the instruction itself is wrong. -2. **Syscall**: Issues with system calls could be related to how QEMU handles them, especially in big-endian mode. Since VDSO is part of optimizing syscalls, this might fit. -3. **Runtime**: This would cover other runtime errors not related to instructions or syscalls directly. - -Since the problem arises during a syscall (or rather, an optimized version via VDSO) and it's specific to how QEMU handles this in big-endian mode, I think the category is **syscall** because it's about the handling of system calls within the emulator. - - -The bug report deals with how QEMU handles the VDSO for ARM big-endian systems during a syscall optimization. Therefore, the issue falls under the syscall category. - -syscalls \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2410 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2410 deleted file mode 100644 index c4fd23311..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2410 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,14 +0,0 @@ - -Okay, let's try to figure out what category this bug falls into. The user is having an issue where setting socket options on RISC-V QEMU gives a "Protocol not available" error, whereas it works fine on x64 Linux. - -So, first, looking at the problem description: they're using setsockopt with IP_OPTIONS on a SOCK_STREAM socket. According to the man page, this should work. But in QEMU, it's failing. The user also provided a link to the QEMU source showing that the relevant path is unimplemented. - -Hmm, so the error occurs when making a system call (setsockopt) which isn't properly handled by the emulator for RISC-V. That suggests it's not an issue with the application code itself but how QEMU handles this particular syscall on this architecture. - -Looking at the possible categories: instruction issues relate to specific CPU instructions; runtime errors are other runtime problems. But here, it's clearly a problem with handling a system call in the emulator. So the category is 'syscall'. - - -The issue arises from how QEMU handles the setsockopt syscall on RISC-V, leading to an unimplemented path error. - -**Answer:** -sys \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2446 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2446 deleted file mode 100644 index 78442028c..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2446 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,21 +0,0 @@ - -Alright, let's break down this problem. The user is reporting an issue where QEMU isn't handling the `set_robust_list` system call properly. They've provided a test program that works on native Linux but fails when run in QEMU. - -First, I'll look at what `set_robust_list` does. It's used by glibc for robust mutexes, which are important for thread safety across process boundaries. If this syscall isn't implemented correctly in QEMU, applications relying on it will fail. - -The test program shows that on native Linux, both calls to `set_robust_list` work as expected. But when run in QEMU, the second call fails with "Function not implemented," indicating that QEMU doesn't support this system call at all. This means any application depending on robust mutexes won't function correctly under QEMU. - -Looking deeper, glibc uses `set_robust_list` during initialization to check for robust list support. If it's missing, functions like `pthread_mutex_init` with robust attributes will return `ENOTSUP`, preventing the use of these mutex types. This is critical because robust mutexes are vital for reliable process synchronization. - -Since QEMU emulates a system, it should accurately implement all necessary system calls to ensure compatibility. The absence of `set_robust_list` breaks this compatibility, especially for applications that rely on pthread robust features. - -So, the issue here is a missing or improperly implemented system call in QEMU's Linux user mode emulation. This directly affects runtime behavior because applications can't use certain pthread functionalities when running under QEMU. - - -The bug report describes an issue where the `set_robust_list` system call is not properly handled by QEMU, leading to errors when applications try to use it. Since this relates to a specific system call implementation in QEMU, the category is: - -**syscall** - -The error occurs because the `set_robust_list` syscall isn't implemented in QEMU's user mode emulation for Linux targets. This affects applications that rely on robust mutexes provided by glibc, such as those using named locks or process-shared mutexes. - -To fix this, QEMU needs to implement the `set_robust_list` system call correctly in its Linux user mode codebase to ensure compatibility with applications expecting this functionality. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2553 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2553 deleted file mode 100644 index 7be7e3d29..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2553 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,22 +0,0 @@ - -Alright, I'm looking at this bug report and trying to figure out what's going on. The user has code that joins an IP multicast group, but when they try to emulate it using QEMU for a 64-bit PowerPC system, it fails with ENODEV. They suspect the issue is related to how the `imr_ifindex` field in the `struct ip_mreqn` is handled during emulation. - -First, I need to understand what's happening here. The user provided their code, which works on a native x86_64 system but fails under QEMU emulation for PowerPC64. When they run it, the `setsockopt` call returns an error because the `imr_ifindex` isn't valid. - -Looking at the QEMU source code in `linux-user/syscall_defs.h`, I see that `struct target_ip_mreqn` uses `abi_long` for `imr_ifindex`. On PowerPC64, `long` is 64 bits, but on Linux, `imr_ifindex` should be a 32-bit integer. So the problem arises because QEMU isn't correctly marshaling this field when passing it to the host system call. - -The user also mentions that in the code, there's a check for `optlen` which allows sizes between `target_ip_mreq` (8 bytes) and `target_ip_mreqn` (16 bytes). However, the actual size is 12 bytes, causing QEMU to pass uninitialized data as part of the struct. This leads to an invalid `imr_ifindex`, hence the ENODEV error. - -So, breaking it down: - -- The issue is related to how system calls are handled by QEMU when emulating a different architecture. -- The problem occurs during the marshaling process of structs between target and host architectures. -- It's specifically about the `setsockopt` syscall not handling the struct correctly. - -Given these points, I think this falls under the "syscall" category because it involves an error with how system calls are implemented in QEMU. The problem isn't a faulty instruction or a runtime error but rather incorrect handling of a system call parameter. - - -The bug report describes an issue where the `setsockopt` syscall fails due to incorrect struct marshaling for IP multicast on emulated 64-bit PowerPC systems. This is related to how QEMU handles system calls and their parameters, specifically the `struct ip_mreqn`. - -sys -call \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/570 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/570 deleted file mode 100644 index 439379a73..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/570 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,11 +0,0 @@ - -Okay, I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report from QEMU. The warning message says "TIOCSER_TEMT" is redefined in termbits.h at line 276. Hmm, TIOCSER_TEMT sounds like a termios constant used in serial port operations. - -I remember that the termios structure is related to terminal settings and I/O control operations. So, if this macro is being redefined, it's probably an issue with how certain system calls are handled or defined within QEMU. - -Looking at the possible categories: instruction, syscall, runtime. Since the warning is about a preprocessor symbol being redefined, which relates to system call definitions (like ioctl commands), I think this falls under the 'syscall' category. It's not an error in a specific instruction execution nor a general runtime error but rather an issue with how syscalls are set up or defined. - - -The bug report involves a redefinition warning of a termios constant, which relates to system call definitions. - -sys \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/602 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/602 deleted file mode 100644 index ba2a107ad..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/602 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,15 +0,0 @@ - -Okay, I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let me read through the problem description carefully. - -The issue is about translating host error numbers to target error numbers in IP_RECVERR and IPV6_RECVERR control messages. The user mentioned that `ee_errno` isn't translated, leading to mismatches between host (like x86_64) and guest (e.g., MIPS) systems. For example, ECONNREFUSED is 111 on the host but should be 146 on MIPS. - -Looking at the provided code snippet, it seems they're adjusting how error numbers are handled in system calls. The fix involves translating the errno using `host_to_target_errno`. - -Now, considering the categories: 'instruction' would relate to specific CPU instructions or assembly issues. This doesn't seem related since it's about error handling in syscalls. 'Runtime' could involve general runtime errors but isn't specific enough here. The problem is specifically with system calls and their error translations, so 'syscall' seems appropriate. - -Thus, the category should be 'syscall'. - - -The bug report deals with translating error numbers in system call messages, which falls under system call handling. - -sysc \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/817 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/817 deleted file mode 100644 index 028116ce4..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/817 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,13 +0,0 @@ - -Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU. The issue mentioned is about the 'waitid' function leaving the target siginfo uninitialized when info.si_pid is zero. Hmm, waitid is a system call in Linux used to wait for a child process and get information about its termination. - -So, the problem here seems to be related to how the siginfo structure is handled after using waitid. If si_pid is zero, that might mean the process ID isn't being set correctly or perhaps it's indicating some error condition where the info isn't properly initialized. - -Since the issue revolves around a system call (waitid) and its handling of the siginfo structure, I think this falls under a syscall category. The bug isn't about an instruction in code being wrong, nor is it a runtime error that occurs elsewhere during execution—it's specifically about how the system call interacts with data structures. - -Therefore, the category should be 'syscall'. - - -The bug report discusses an issue related to the waitid system call and its handling of siginfo. Therefore, it falls under the syscall category. - -sys \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/829 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/829 deleted file mode 100644 index 51898ec59..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/829 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,21 +0,0 @@ - -Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let me read through the problem description again to understand what's going on. - -The user is reporting an issue when running a test program under qemu-arm. The test involves creating a file in /tmp and then opening it using openat(). They mention that strace shows the path being prefixed with the sysroot, which is causing problems. Specifically, when they call openat(tmpfd, tmpfile_name), it fails because the fd points to a sysroot-prefixed path instead of just /tmp. - -So the problem arises from how the user space emulation in QEMU handles certain system calls, particularly those involving file paths and opening files. The issue seems to be related to path translation when using openat(), which relies on file descriptors that might have been modified by QEMU's sysroot handling. - -Looking at the categories: - -- Instruction: This would involve a problem with specific CPU instructions being incorrectly handled. -- Syscall: Issues related to system calls, possibly incorrect implementation or handling in the emulator. -- Runtime: Other runtime errors not covered by the above two. - -The problem here is specifically about how certain syscalls (like openat()) are being manipulated when using the sysroot. This points towards an issue with how these system calls are handled in the emulation layer, which would fall under syscall issues. - -Therefore, the bug report should be classified as a 'syscall' category. - - -The issue arises from incorrect handling of system calls related to path translation in user space emulation, specifically affecting `openat()` and file descriptors. This falls under the category of syscall errors. - -syscalls \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/833 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/833 deleted file mode 100644 index 18febe9ff..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/833 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,21 +0,0 @@ - -Alright, I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report into one of the given categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let's break down what's happening here. - -The problem is about the `sendmsg` system call failing in QEMU when there's no iov but ancillary data is present. In a normal Linux environment, it works fine, but under QEMU, the message without iov isn't sent, which causes issues for applications like the `ell` library that rely on this functionality. - -Looking at the steps to reproduce, they mention using `strace` and seeing that in QEMU, one of the `sendmsg` calls is missing. This suggests that QEMU isn't handling the `sendmsg` call correctly when the message has no data but includes ancillary information. - -The key point here is that the issue revolves around how QEMU handles a specific system call (`sendmsg`) with certain parameters. It's not about an incorrect instruction being executed or a runtime error like a segmentation fault; it's more about the syscall itself not behaving as expected in the emulator. - -So, considering the categories: - -- **Instruction**: This would relate to processor-level issues or incorrect assembly instructions, which doesn't seem to be the case here. -- **Syscall**: This involves how system calls are handled by the kernel or emulator. Since `sendmsg` is a syscall and the issue is about its behavior in QEMU, this fits. -- **Runtime**: This would cover errors that occur during program execution but aren't tied to specific syscalls. Again, since the problem is specifically with `sendmsg`, it's more aligned with syscall issues. - -Therefore, the bug is likely related to how QEMU emulates the `sendmsg` system call when certain parameters are provided. - - -The issue pertains to how the `sendmsg` system call is handled in QEMU under specific conditions. This falls under how the system call is processed rather than an instruction-level or runtime error. - -sys \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/911 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/911 deleted file mode 100644 index 859f5cec9..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/911 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,17 +0,0 @@ - -Okay, so I'm looking at this bug report about QEMU not showing execve calls when using strace on a mipsel user-mode application. The user built QEMU from source, specifically version 6.2.0 and a later snapshot 6.2.90, with some specific configure options. They're trying to trace system calls made by their test application, which uses both system() and popen(), but the strace output doesn't show execve. - -Hmm, I remember that execve is a syscall that's used when executing a new program. It replaces the current process image, so it doesn't return on success—it instead starts the new program. That could explain why tracing it might be tricky because if the call succeeds, the tracer wouldn't see the return. - -Looking at the provided logs, in version 4.2.1 of QEMU, the execve calls do appear in the strace output. But in versions 6.2.0 and 6.2.90, they don't. So something changed between these versions that affects how QEMU handles tracing for this specific syscall. - -I'm thinking about what could cause this change. Maybe there were modifications to how QEMU intercepts syscalls or handles the execution flow after an execve. Perhaps a bug was introduced in handling strace for syscalls that don't return, like execve. - -Another angle is how safe_execve works. The user mentioned that it's not returning, which makes sense because execve doesn't return on success. But older versions could still capture the call. So maybe there was a regression where the tracing mechanism relies on the syscall returning to log it, but for execve, this isn't possible. - -So categorizing this bug: It's related to how QEMU handles syscalls during execution. Specifically, it's an issue with the strace functionality not capturing execve calls correctly. Since it's about a system call and its tracing, the category should be 'syscall'. - - -The bug is related to the failure in capturing `execve` system calls when using strace in QEMU's mipsel user mode. This issue pertains to how QEMU handles syscalls during execution. - -sys \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/957 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/957 deleted file mode 100644 index d6dd0eb2d..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/957 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,17 +0,0 @@ - -Okay, I need to figure out what category this bug falls into. The user provided a detailed problem where Python crashes during a rebuild using qemu-m68k. The error message is "The futex facility returned an unexpected error code." - -Looking at the log, it seems like there are multiple threads causing issues with futex calls. Futex is a system call used for synchronization in multi-threaded applications. The error message suggests that when the futex function returns an unexpected value, it's triggering an abort. - -The problem occurs during Python builds, which can be resource-intensive and involve many threads. The user mentioned that using MAKEOPTS=-j1 reduces the issue probability, implying concurrency is a factor. Also, running with qemu -systrace or QEMU_STRACE=1 decreases the error occurrence but not entirely. - -The logs show several futex calls with different operations (FUTEX_WAIT, FUTEX_WAKE, etc.), and some return errors like "Invalid argument." This indicates that the system is receiving unexpected results from these syscalls. - -Since the issue arises from how syscalls (specifically futex) are being handled by qemu-m68k, it's likely a problem with the syscall implementation in QEMU, not an instruction-level bug or a runtime error unrelated to syscalls. - -So, the category should be 'syscall' because it involves errors during system calls. - - -The issue is related to errors occurring during system calls (specifically futex) within the qemu-m68k environment. The problem arises from unexpected return values in these syscalls, leading to runtime failures. - -syscalls \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/982 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/982 deleted file mode 100644 index b26afe5f1..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/982 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,27 +0,0 @@ - -Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report about QEMU's --strace incorrectly decoding writev arguments on 32-bit machines when running 64-bit binaries. Let me go through the information step by step. - -The user provided a description where using strace with QEMU shows incorrect decoding of the writev system call arguments for 64-bit binaries on a 32-bit machine. The steps to reproduce include compiling the same code for different architectures and then running them under QEMU with strace. When they run strace, the output for writev is wrong in certain cases. - -Looking at the outputs: - -- For i686-main (32-bit), strace shows correct decoding. -- For x86_64-main (64-bit on a 64-bit host), strace also shows correct decoding with the nil pointer and address. -- But when using qemu-i386 --strace on the i686-main, it incorrectly decodes the arguments as addresses instead of showing the actual data. Similarly, for aarch64, it's not showing correctly. - -So the problem seems to be that QEMU is misinterpreting how the writev system call's arguments are being passed when running 64-bit binaries on a 32-bit emulator with --strace. This affects how strace displays the arguments, making them look like memory addresses instead of the actual data structures. - -Now, I need to categorize this bug. The options are instruction, syscall, or runtime. - -- Instruction: If it were an issue with a specific CPU instruction being wrong. -- Syscall: An error in handling system calls, possibly misinterpretation of parameters. -- Runtime: Other runtime errors not related to instructions or syscalls. - -This seems to be a problem with how QEMU handles the decoding of system call arguments for writev when using --strace. Since writev is a syscall and the issue arises during its processing under strace, it's likely a syscall-related error in the emulation. The incorrect display suggests that the arguments are not being parsed correctly by the strace mechanism in QEMU. - -So I think this falls under 'syscall' because it involves misdecoding the parameters of a system call when tracing. - - -The bug report is about incorrect decoding of writev's arguments during --strace, which relates to how syscalls are handled. - -syscalls \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1033 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1033 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..3824e028a --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1033 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ + +Okay, so I need to figure out what category this bug falls into. The problem is that when running fakeroot under qemu, it fails with an error about semop(1) not being implemented. From the description, it looks like someone tried to fix a similar issue in another bug report but is still having problems. + +The user mentions they built qemu from the latest git repo, which should include the previous fix. They set up an schroot environment for arm architecture and run fakeroot as part of building a package. The error occurs during this process. + +So, looking at the possible categories: instruction, syscall, runtime. The error message specifically mentions 'semop(1): encountered an error: Function not implemented'. Semop is a system call used for semaphore operations. Since it's saying the function isn't implemented, that points to a problem with how qemu handles syscalls. + +Therefore, this issue relates to a problem during a system call within qemu. So the category should be 'syscall'. + + +The bug report discusses an error with the semop syscall not being implemented in qemu. This indicates a problem with handling system calls. + +sys \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1054831 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1054831 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..7fec8da36 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1054831 @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ + +Okay, I'm trying to help classify this bug report related to QEMU. Let me go through it step by step. + +So, the user is setting up a sparc chroot on a Debian x86-64 host system. They followed the usual steps: creating a directory, using debootstrap with --foreign for sparc architecture, copying the qemu-sparc32plus-static binary into the chroot's /usr/bin, and then trying to run the second stage of debootstrap inside the chroot. + +When they execute the command `sudo chroot sparc/ /usr/bin/qemu-sparc32plus-static /bin/bash`, it seems to work initially. But when running `/debootstrap/debootstrap --second-stage`, they encounter an error: `bash: fork: Invalid argument`. + +The user mentioned that this process works perfectly for armhf, but not for sparc32plus. They're using the current QEMU git HEAD at commit 93b65997. + +I need to figure out what's causing this issue and classify it under one of the given categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. + +First, I should understand what "fork: Invalid argument" means. The fork() system call is used by a process to create a new child process. If fork returns an error like "Invalid argument", that suggests something's wrong with how the process is trying to fork. + +Looking deeper, when using QEMU user mode (like qemu-sparc32plus-static), it translates system calls from the guest architecture (sparc) to the host's (x86-64). If there's a problem in this translation layer, especially around system calls like fork, that could cause such errors. + +In this case, since armhf works fine but sparc doesn't, it points towards an issue specific to how QEMU is handling sparc32plus syscalls. Maybe the implementation of fork() isn't correctly handled for sparc in QEMU user mode. + +So, considering the categories: + +- **Instruction**: This would relate to a faulty instruction being executed. But here, the error is about a system call (fork) failing. + +- **Syscall**: Since the problem occurs at the syscall level with fork(), this seems relevant. The issue might be in how QEMU translates or handles the fork() call for sparc32plus. + +- **Runtime**: This could cover other runtime errors, but since it's specifically a system call failure, 'syscall' is more precise. + +Therefore, I think the category here is 'syscall'. + + +The error occurs during a system call (fork), indicating an issue with how QEMU handles this syscall for sparc32plus. + +syscal \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1066909 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1066909 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c92b37018 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1066909 @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ + +Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report about QEMU's microblaze emulator having an issue with CLONE_THREAD. The user is saying that when they use CLONE_THREAD, the new process starts at the system call instruction instead of the next one, causing threads to multiply and crash quickly. + +First, I need to understand what category this falls under: instruction, syscall, or runtime. + +The bug is related to how QEMU handles the clone system call specifically for creating threads on microblaze. The problem isn't about executing an incorrect instruction but rather about the behavior of a system call (clone) not working as expected. So it's more than just a faulty instruction; it's about the handling of a syscall. + +Looking at the possible categories: +- Instruction: Faulty instructions, which doesn't seem to be the case here. +- Syscall: Errors related to how system calls are handled. +- Runtime: Other runtime errors not covered by the above two. + +Since the issue is specifically with the clone syscall and how it's emulated, leading to incorrect thread creation behavior, this falls under 'syscall'. + + +The bug report describes an error in handling the CLONE_THREAD system call within QEMU's microblaze emulator. It's a problem with the syscall emulation rather than an instruction or general runtime issue. + +sys \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1075272 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1075272 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..f212b4169 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1075272 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ + +Okay, so I'm looking at this bug report about QEMU and socket type mapping issues for MIPS app-level emulation. The user is saying that when an application makes a socket call like socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP), it ends up using SOCK_DGRAM instead, which causes an error. + +The problem arises because in the do_socket function within syscall.c, there's a remapping happening to handle how MIPS permutes socket types. However, this remapping doesn't account for additional flags like SOCK_NONBLOCK or SOCK_CLOEXEC that might be OR'ed with the type. So when these flags are present, they interfere with the permutation logic, leading to incorrect socket calls and errors. + +I need to classify this bug into one of three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. + +First, considering "instruction" would mean it's about a specific CPU instruction being handled incorrectly. But here, the issue is about system calls and their parameters, not about executing an instruction. + +Next, looking at "runtime", which covers errors that happen during execution but aren't necessarily related to syscalls or instructions. However, the problem described is directly tied to how a syscall (socket) is being handled. + +The third option is "syscall", which refers to issues with system calls. Since the bug report discusses incorrect handling of socket types in the do_socket function, which processes the socket syscall, this seems like it fits under the syscall category. + +Therefore, the appropriate classification for this bug should be "syscall". + + +The issue pertains to how QEMU handles the socket system call parameters, specifically failing to account for certain flags when remapping socket types. This falls under incorrect handling of a system call. + +syscalls \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1075339 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1075339 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..0b29cbb81 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1075339 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ + +Okay, I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report about QEMU's setsockopt handling. The user mentioned that when using Linux-user emulation in QEMU, the setsockopt function ignores the optlen argument. Instead, it treats the argument as a 4-byte integer. This is causing issues because some socket options, like timeouts, require larger structures such as timeval which can be 8 or 16 bytes depending on the word size. + +So, I need to determine whether this bug falls under the 'instruction', 'syscall', or 'runtime' category. Let's break it down: + +1. **Instruction Category**: This would involve issues with specific CPU instructions or assembly-level problems. The report doesn't mention any instruction-level errors, so probably not this one. + +2. **Syscall Category**: This relates to issues with system calls in the operating system. Since setsockopt is a system call and the problem is about how QEMU handles it during emulation, especially ignoring optlen and incorrectly treating the argument as a 4-byte int, this seems relevant. The issue is about handling a specific syscall parameter improperly. + +3. **Runtime Category**: This would cover other runtime errors not related to instructions or syscalls. While the bug does cause runtime problems (like incorrect timeouts), the root cause is in how the syscall is handled by QEMU's emulation layer. + +Considering that the problem directly involves the setsockopt system call and its arguments, it makes sense to classify this under 'syscall'. The issue arises from improper handling of the syscall parameters during emulation. + + +The bug report discusses an issue with the `setsockopt` system call in QEMU's Linux-user emulation. It incorrectly handles the `optlen` argument by treating it as a 4-byte integer, which causes problems for socket options requiring larger data structures like `timeval`. This directly relates to how the syscall is implemented and handled. + +**syscall** + +The bug pertains to incorrect handling of a system call parameter in QEMU's emulation. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/122 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/122 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..0f57695a2 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/122 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ + +Okay, I need to classify this bug report for QEMU. The issue mentioned is "linux-user does not check PROT_EXEC". Let me break it down. + +First, I remember that QEMU has different modes, including user mode emulation (linux-user) which allows running binaries from one OS on another. So the problem is in that part of QEMU. + +The term PROT_EXEC refers to a memory protection flag used in syscalls like mmap or mprotect. It allows execution of code in that memory region. If linux-user isn't checking this, it might lead to security issues because it could allow executing unauthorized code. + +Now, looking at the categories: instruction, syscall, runtime. This issue is about how QEMU handles PROT_EXEC in user mode. It's more about how the emulation interacts with system calls and memory protections rather than a specific instruction or runtime error elsewhere. + +So, the problem relates to syscalls and how they're handled. Therefore, it falls under 'syscall'. + + +The bug report pertains to the handling of PROT_EXEC within the linux-user mode of QEMU, which affects how system calls related to memory protection are managed. + +syscalls \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/127 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/127 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..283b562f6 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/127 @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ + +Okay, I'm looking at this bug report for QEMU that says "linux-user missing cmsg IP_PKTINFO support ('Unsupported ancillary data: 0/8')". The user is asking me to classify this bug into one of three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. + +First, I need to understand what the issue is. Ancillary data in networking refers to additional information that can be sent along with a message, such as source routing or packet info. In Linux, IP_PKTINFO is used to get information about the incoming packet's interface and address. + +The error message suggests that when trying to handle this ancillary data, QEMU is encountering an unsupported case. Specifically, it's not handling cmsg (control messages) related to IP_PKTINFO. Since this relates to how network packets are processed, especially their metadata, it's likely a system call issue because socket operations involve syscalls like recvmsg which deal with control messages. + +Looking at the categories: +- Instruction: This would relate to specific CPU instructions or assembly code errors, which doesn't seem to be the case here. +- Syscall: Errors related to how system calls are handled. Since this involves networking and ancillary data, which is part of socket syscalls, this seems relevant. +- Runtime: General runtime errors not tied to a specific instruction or syscall. + +Given that the issue is about handling control messages during socket operations, it's more aligned with a syscall error because QEMU might be mishandling how these system calls are implemented in its user-mode emulation. Therefore, the category should be 'syscall'. + + +The bug report pertains to handling ancillary data during socket operations, which involves system calls. + +syscalls \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1394 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1394 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..7084e41ec --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1394 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ + +Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let me read through the problem description carefully. + +The issue is about getresuid() returning incorrect uid values when run in a big-endian sparc64 guest under QEMU. The user provided an example where UID 0x000003e8 becomes 0x03e80000, which looks like a byte-swapping issue. + +From the steps to reproduce, they're compiling and running code that uses getresuid(). They mention it doesn't happen outside QEMU, so it's likely related to how QEMU handles something. The problem occurs when calling getresuid(), which is a system call. + +Looking at possible causes: since this affects a system call, it might be an issue in how QEMU translates or handles that particular syscall. Alternatively, maybe the glibc implementation within QEMU isn't handling endianness correctly, but since they mention it's part of QEMU, I should focus there. + +So, considering the problem is with getresuid(), which is a syscall, and the error occurs in the context of QEMU emulating that call. Therefore, this falls under the 'syscall' category because the issue arises when making a system call within the emulator. + + +The bug report describes an incorrect handling of the getresuid() system call, leading to byte-swapping issues. This is related to how the syscall is implemented or translated by QEMU. + +syscalls \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1416988 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1416988 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..4658b4ca4 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1416988 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ + +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let's break it down step by step. + +The user is experiencing issues when running GCC tests under qemu-aarch64. The problem seems to be related to signal handling, specifically a segmentation fault and infinite loops in certain test cases. They noticed that the sizes of siginfo structures between the Linux kernel and QEMU differ: 136 vs. 128 bytes. + +The user identified that the issue arises from an incorrect definition of TARGET_SI_PAD_SIZE in QEMU's syscall_defs.h. In the kernel, this is calculated as (SI_MAX_SIZE - __ARCH_SI_PREAMBLE_SIZE) divided by sizeof(int), which for Aarch64 is 4 * sizeof(int). So the padding size would be adjusted accordingly to fit within SI_MAX_SIZE. + +In contrast, QEMU currently defines TARGET_SI_PAD_SIZE as (TARGET_SI_MAX_SIZE / sizeof(int)) - 3. This leads to a larger pad than necessary because it doesn't account for the preambles correctly, causing the structures to be misaligned and mismatched between host and target. + +This seems to affect how signals are handled when running user space applications under QEMU. Since it's about handling signals, which involves system calls (like sigreturn or rt_sigreturn), I think this falls under a syscall issue because the problem occurs during signal processing, which relies on syscalls for communication between userland and the kernel. + +So, putting it all together, the bug is related to how QEMU handles system calls involving signal information structures. The incorrect padding size leads to ABI incompatibility, causing segmentation faults when applications try to use these signals. Therefore, this should be classified under 'syscall'. + + +The issue stems from a miscalculation of the pad size for siginfo structures in QEMU's syscall handling, leading to an ABI mismatch with the Linux kernel. This affects signal processing and is related to system calls. + +syscalls \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1643619 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1643619 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..3472a039a --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1643619 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ + +Alright, I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report as either an instruction, syscall, or runtime issue within QEMU. + +The problem described is that netlink is broken on big-endian MIPS when using qemu-user. The user ran 'ip route' in a Debian chroot and it hung. They provided strace output showing that the process was waiting for a netlink response which never came. + +Looking at the strace, I see that the sendto call includes a buffer with len=671088640, which is 0x28000000 in hex. This looks like it's been byteswapped because on big-endian systems, byte order matters differently than on little-endian. The user mentioned that by removing the call to fd_trans_unregister in do_syscall for NR_socket, the issue was fixed. + +The bug seems related to how file descriptors are being translated or handled when making syscalls. Specifically, after creating a socket (which is a syscall), the code immediately unregisters the translation of the file descriptor. This could cause issues if other parts of the system expect that translation to still be in place for subsequent operations like sendto. + +So this isn't an instruction-level bug because it's not about specific CPU instructions or assembly code. It's also not a runtime issue in the sense of general execution problems. Instead, it's about how syscalls (in this case, socket) are being handled and their related file descriptor translations. The problem arises from the way the system calls interact with the file descriptors, specifically when dealing with endianness. + +Therefore, the category should be 'syscall' because it relates to errors in handling system calls within QEMU. + + +The bug is classified under 'syscall' as it involves an error related to system call handling, particularly with file descriptor translations and netlink communication on big-endian MIPS. + +syscalls \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1673976 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1673976 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..035e5d3e9 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1673976 @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ + +Okay, so I need to figure out how to classify this bug report into one of the three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let's break down what the problem is here. + +The user is running locale-gen inside an armv7h chroot on their x86_64 desktop using qemu-arm-static. They've been doing this successfully for years but started having issues in the last few months, possibly after updating to QEMU 2.8. The error they're encountering is a core dump from localedef, which says there's an assertion failure in glibc's spawni.c file at line 360: `__spawnix: Assertion 'ec >= 0' failed.` + +The first thing I notice is that the issue involves using qemu to run an ARM binary on an x86_64 system. The problem arises during a locale generation process, which suggests it's related to how the environment or binaries are being handled within the chroot. + +Looking at the error message, it points to glibc's posix_spawn function having an assertion failure. Specifically, `ec >= 0` is failing, meaning that some value expected to be non-negative isn't, causing the program to abort. + +Now, considering the possible categories: + +1. **Instruction**: This would involve issues with specific machine instructions not being handled correctly by QEMU. If QEMU was mis-emulating an ARM instruction, that could cause problems. However, the error here is about a system call failure in glibc, which is more about how the process is being spawned. + +2. **Syscall**: Errors related to system calls would involve issues with how QEMU translates or handles system calls from the guest environment to the host. Since posix_spawn involves making system calls (like spawn), if QEMU isn't handling them correctly, that could cause such an error. + +3. **Runtime**: This category covers other runtime errors not specifically tied to instructions or syscalls. However, in this case, it seems like a specific issue with how processes are spawned, which ties back into system call handling. + +Given the context, the problem is likely due to how QEMU handles the posix_spawn syscall when running armv7h binaries on an x86_64 host. The assertion failure suggests that the environment or arguments passed during the spawn are incorrect, possibly because QEMU isn't correctly emulating or translating the necessary system calls for this operation. + +Therefore, I would classify this issue under **syscall** because it's related to how system calls, specifically posix_spawn, are handled by QEMU in the emulation process. + + +sys \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1701973 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1701973 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..722d0e01f --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1701973 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ + +Okay, so I'm looking at this bug report where pread isn't working correctly under qemu-sh4. Let me try to understand what's going on here. + +First, the user provided a test program that uses the pread system call. When they run it under qemu-sh4 version 2.9.0, instead of getting ret=1 with errno=0 as expected, they're getting ret=0 and errno=2. This is causing an assertion failure because the code expects ret to be 1. + +I know that pread is a system call used for reading from a file descriptor at a specific position without updating the file pointer. So, if it's returning 0 instead of 1, something's wrong with how many bytes were read or perhaps an error occurred. + +The error number 2 corresponds to ENOENT, which usually means "No such file or directory." But in this context, since we're using a file descriptor, maybe the issue isn't about the file not existing but rather some problem in handling the pread call itself. + +Looking at the steps provided: they compile the program with static linking and run it under qemu. The fact that the program is statically linked might mean that it's using its own C library, which could affect how system calls are handled by qemu. + +The possible categories to classify this bug are instruction, syscall, or runtime. Since pread is a system call and the issue arises when calling it, it seems like the problem lies in how qemu handles this particular syscall. Maybe there's an incorrect implementation of the pread function in qemu-sh4, leading to the wrong return value and error code. + +I don't see any mention of faulty instructions or other runtime errors beyond the syscall failure. So, the most fitting category here is 'syscall' because it's directly related to how the system call is processed by the emulator. + + +The bug report describes an issue with the pread system call returning incorrect values under qemu-sh4, which falls under handling of a system call. + +syscalls \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1729 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1729 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..1431a9efa --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1729 @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ + +Okay, so I need to figure out how to classify this bug report as either 'instruction', 'syscall', or 'runtime'. Let's break it down step by step. + +The problem occurs when running a 32-bit program on a 64-bit host using qemu-user-static. The issue is with the `mremap` function in the musl-libc library. Specifically, when `pthread_getattr_np` is called, it enters an infinite loop because `mremap` keeps failing with `EFAULT`. + +Looking at the code snippet provided, the while loop in `pthread_getattr_np.c` uses `mremap` and checks if it returns `MAP_FAILED` due to `ENOMEM`. The problem arises when `mremap` fails for a different reason, causing the loop to repeat indefinitely. + +The key points here are: +1. It's related to a system call (`mremap`). +2. The failure is due to an error condition (`EFAULT`) that isn't properly handled. +3. This issue happens at runtime when the program is executed under qemu-user-static. + +Since `mremap` is a syscall, and the problem stems from how it's being handled or called, the category should be 'syscall'. It's not about an incorrect instruction or a general runtime error but specifically about a syscall failing unexpectedly. + + +The bug report involves an issue with the `mremap` system call causing unexpected behavior when running under qemu-user-static. The problem arises from how the syscall is being handled, leading to an infinite loop. + +sys \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1734792 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1734792 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..9f9372355 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1734792 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ + +Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. The issue is that QEMU isn't supporting the memfd_create syscall, resulting in an error when a userspace application uses it. + +First, looking at what each category entails: + +- **Instruction**: This would involve issues with how instructions are handled by the CPU emulator in QEMU. For example, if a specific instruction causes a problem. +- **Syscall**: This relates to system calls that the guest OS makes which aren't properly handled by QEMU's user mode emulation. +- **Runtime**: Covers other runtime errors not related to instructions or syscalls. + +The bug report mentions that memfd_create is failing with an error "Unsupported syscall: 319". The number 319 corresponds to the syscall number for memfd_create in Linux. Since this is a system call issue where QEMU doesn't support it, the problem falls under the syscall category. + +So, the classification should be 'syscall' because it's about handling a specific system call that isn't implemented. + + +The bug report describes an issue with QEMU not supporting the memfd_create syscall, which is a system call error. + +sys \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1760 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1760 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..8be0f305c --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1760 @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ + +Okay, I'm trying to classify this bug report about qemu8-i386 not handling the mmap syscall correctly for 32-bit applications. Let me go through the details step by step. + +First, the problem occurs when running an oldmmap program under QEMU. The strace output shows that the correct arguments are being passed to the mmap system call, but QEMU's -strace is showing different and incorrect arguments. For example, in the user's example, strace reports mmap with NULL as the address, 8192 bytes, etc., while QEMU reports something like 0x40800058 as the first argument. + +Looking at the code provided, the oldmmap.S file uses inline assembly to push the arguments onto the stack for the syscall. The order of pushing is important because syscalls in Linux traditionally use this method. So, the user's program pushes the offset (0), fd (-1), flags (MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS), protection (PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE), length (8192, which is 2<<12), and address (0) onto the stack, then sets ebx to esp pointing to this array of arguments. Eax is set to _NR_mmap (90). + +Now, in QEMU's output, it's interpreting the mmap syscall with different arguments: (0x40800058, 0, PROT_NONE, ...). This suggests that either the order of the arguments is incorrect or they're being read from the wrong place. + +The key point here is how syscalls are handled in QEMU. For i386, the old syscall convention uses eax for the number and then pushes the arguments onto the stack. However, newer methods might use different registers. But since _NR_mmap is 90, which was an older syscall number (in some contexts, it's now higher on x86_64), this implies that the code is using the i386 syscall convention. + +QEMU should correctly interpret the stack arguments when emulating the old syscalls. If QEMU isn't decoding them properly, it might be because of a bug in how it reads the stack for these specific syscalls or perhaps an issue with register handling. + +The user mentioned that this is happening on 32-bit mode, so it's not a problem related to instruction encoding but more about how system calls are parsed. Since the issue is specifically about the arguments passed to mmap (a system call), and not about executing instructions incorrectly or runtime errors elsewhere, this falls under a syscall category. + +Therefore, I classify this bug as 'syscall' because it involves incorrect handling of the system call arguments by QEMU's emulator. + + +The issue arises from QEMU improperly decoding the stack-based arguments for the mmap syscall, leading to incorrect strace output. This is related to how syscalls are handled in the emulator. + +**Answer:** +sys \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1761153 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1761153 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..61a164cac --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1761153 @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ + +Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report related to QEMU. Let me read through it carefully and understand what's going on here. + +The issue is about mmap behaving incorrectly when dealing with large files on a 64-bit host running a 32-bit executable via QEMU. The user provided a test program, `test_mmap.c`, which they compiled as a 32-bit binary. When they run it under qemu-i386, the output is "Incorrect data 1", indicating that something went wrong with the mmap operation. + +The problem seems to occur when the offset exceeds 4GiB, which makes sense because 32-bit systems can't address more than that due to their limited pointer size. So, when trying to mmap a file beyond 4GB on a 64-bit host using a 32-bit guest executable via QEMU, it's failing. + +Looking at the possible categories: instruction, syscall, runtime. The user is asking which category this bug falls into. Let me think about each possibility. + +First, "instruction" would imply that there's an issue with how specific instructions are handled by QEMU. This doesn't seem to be the case here since the problem isn't about executing a particular opcode incorrectly but rather handling file mappings. + +Next, "syscall": this relates to errors when making system calls. Mmap is indeed a system call (sys_mmap), so if QEMU is mishandling it, especially across 32/64-bit boundaries, that would fit here. The issue arises during the mmap operation, which involves handling pointers and addresses correctly between different architectures. + +Lastly, "runtime" is for other runtime errors not covered by instructions or syscalls. Since this seems tied to how system calls are emulated, especially involving address spaces and memory mappings, it's more likely a syscall issue rather than a general runtime problem. + +Putting it all together: the bug is related to QEMU's handling of mmap syscalls when the guest is 32-bit and the host is 64-bit. Therefore, this should be categorized under "syscall". + + +The bug relates to how QEMU handles the mmap system call across different architectures, specifically between a 64-bit host and a 32-bit guest executable. + +syscalls \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1783362 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1783362 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..53f2a12a9 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1783362 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ + +Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report related to QEMU. The issue is that when using mmap with len==0 on an ARM64 binary running under QEMU on an x86_64 host, it returns success (NULL, 0) instead of failure (MAP_FAILED, -1). + +First, I need to understand what the problem is. Mmap is a system call used for memory mapping files or allocating anonymous memory. According to the POSIX standard, if len is zero, mmap should return MAP_FAILED and set errno to EINVAL. But in this case, under QEMU's user emulation, it returns NULL and 0, which suggests a success, but that's incorrect. + +The user provided steps to reproduce the issue. They compiled a test program for ARM64 using a cross-compiler and ran it on an x86_64 host with QEMU-user. The program asserts that mmap should return MAP_FAILED when len is zero, but under QEMU, it doesn't, causing the assertion to fail. + +Looking at the possible categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. + +"Instruction" would be if there was a problem with how an instruction was handled by the emulator. "Syscall" relates directly to system calls not behaving as expected, which seems to fit here because mmap is a syscall and it's returning incorrect values. "Runtime" might involve other issues during execution that aren't tied to specific instructions or syscalls. + +Since the issue revolves around how QEMU handles the mmap system call when len is zero, this points towards a problem in the syscall handling within QEMU. The bug is specifically about the behavior of mmap, which is a syscall, so it's likely categorized under "syscall." + +Additionally, the fact that running on a native ARM64 host works correctly (returns -1 and sets errno to 22) indicates that QEMU's emulation isn't correctly handling this edge case. This further supports the idea that the issue lies in how the syscall is being emulated by QEMU. + + +The bug pertains to incorrect behavior of the mmap system call under QEMU when len is zero, which falls under the "syscall" category. + +syscalls \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1805913 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1805913 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..cab4fac7f --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1805913 @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ + +Okay, I'm trying to classify this bug report into one of the given categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let me break it down step by step. + +The issue is that when running 32-bit user-static QEMU on a 64-bit host, the readdir() function returns NULL with errno=EOVERFLOW. From the provided code and explanation, I understand that this happens because the inode numbers returned by getdents64 (a syscall) are 64-bit values, but in a 32-bit environment, these can't fit into the 32-bit DIR* structure expected by readdir(). The glibc code is checking for this overflow and throwing EOVERFLOW. + +So, what's happening here? The problem arises when the user-space application (compiled for 32-bit) interacts with the kernel (64-bit). The QEMU emulator is supposed to handle this translation, but it's not doing so properly. Specifically, it's passing through the 64-bit inode numbers directly without converting them to a compatible 32-bit format. + +Looking at the categories: + +1. Instruction: This would relate to issues with CPU instructions or assembly-level problems. I don't think that's the case here; the problem is more about data handling between different architectures. + +2. Syscall: Since the issue involves syscalls like getdents64, which are being called from user-space into the kernel, and how their results are handled by QEMU. The problem occurs during the processing of these syscalls. + +3. Runtime: This would cover issues that happen during program execution but aren't directly tied to instruction-level or syscall handling. However, in this case, the issue is specifically about how QEMU handles a syscall result, which makes it more about syscall processing rather than a general runtime error. + +So, considering that the bug report is about QEMU not correctly translating or handling 64-bit syscalls for a 32-bit environment, especially with getdents64, this falls under the 'syscall' category. It's an issue in how QEMU manages system calls and their data when emulating a different architecture. + + +The bug report is about how QEMU handles a syscall (getdents64) for a 32-bit application on a 64-bit host, leading to an EOVERFLOW error because of incompatible data types. This is categorized under 'syscall' as it involves system call handling and translation between architectures. + +**Answer:** +syscal \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1810433 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1810433 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..5fb84ffb5 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1810433 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ + +Okay, so I'm looking at this bug report about qemu-aarch64-linux-user having inconsistent pwrite behavior. The user provided a minimal test case where they open a file, fallocate some space, and then call pwrite with buf as NULL and len as 0. They noticed that on native x86_64 and aarch64 systems, pwrite returns 0, but when running under qemu-aarch64, it returns -1 instead. + +Hmm, the first thing I need to figure out is why this discrepancy exists. Let me recall what pwrite does. According to the man page, pwrite writes up to len bytes from the buffer starting at buf into the file descriptor fd at offset off. If len is 0, then no bytes are written, but according to POSIX, it should return 0 in that case. + +Wait, so both native systems are returning 0 when len is 0, regardless of whether buf is NULL or not? That's correct behavior because writing zero bytes doesn't require accessing the buffer. So passing a NULL buffer shouldn't matter since no data is copied from it. + +Now, looking at the qemu setup: they're using the aarch64-linux-user target and the specific commit 20d6c7312f1b812bb9c750f4087f69ac8485cc90. The issue is that pwrite returns -1 in this environment, which suggests an error occurred. But according to the function's specs, it shouldn't fail when len is 0. + +I need to determine where the problem lies. Since the behavior is different from the native systems, it's likely a bug in how qemu handles the pwrite syscall for aarch64 targets. Maybe there's an issue with the emulation of the pwrite call in that specific target. + +Looking at the possible categories: instruction, syscall, runtime. The problem is about the handling of the pwrite system call returning an incorrect value under certain conditions. This points towards it being a syscall-related issue because it's how the system call is emulated that's causing the discrepancy. + +So the category should be "syscall". + + +The bug report describes an inconsistency in how the `pwrite` system call is handled by `qemu-aarch64-linux-user`. The native systems return 0 when `len` is 0, while qemu returns -1. This indicates a problem with the syscall emulation. + +sys \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1837 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1837 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a4ba1049a --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1837 @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ + +Alright, I'm looking at this bug report about QEMU not supporting the IP_MULTICAST_IF socket option. The user provided a test program that uses setsockopt to try setting this option on a UDP socket under QEMU's aarch64-static environment. They're getting an error saying "Protocol not available," which suggests that the system call isn't handling this particular socket option correctly. + +First, I need to classify this bug into one of the given categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. The issue here is with how the setsockopt system call is being handled within QEMU's user-mode emulation. The test program is using a standard system call (setsockopt) that's failing because QEMU doesn't support IP_MULTICAST_IF. + +So, this isn't an issue with an instruction execution but rather how a system call is implemented in QEMU. The problem arises during the runtime when trying to execute this specific syscall. Therefore, it falls under the 'syscall' category because the bug is related to the incorrect handling or absence of support for a particular system call within the emulator. + + +The bug report pertains to an issue with how the setsockopt system call is handled in QEMU's user-mode emulation. Since the problem arises from the unsupported IP_MULTICAST_IF socket option, it falls under the category of a system call error. + +syscalls \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1869073 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1869073 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..4d8d5dd16 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1869073 @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ + +Okay, so I'm trying to figure out why qemu-arm-static crashes with a segmentation fault when running "git clone -s". The user wants me to classify this bug as either instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let's break it down step by step. + +First, what is qemu-arm-static? It's a QEMU emulator for ARM architecture, static binary version. It allows running ARM binaries on an x86 host. In this case, the user is using it to cross-compile software via distcc, which distributes compilation tasks across multiple machines or cores. + +Now, when they run a script that uses "git clone -s", qemu crashes with a segmentation fault. Alternatively, sometimes git just hangs with 100% CPU usage. So this happens reliably every time the script tries to execute that git command under qemu-arm-static. + +Segmentation faults usually occur due to invalid memory accesses—like trying to read or write memory that the program isn't allowed to access. This could be a bug in the emulator itself, or perhaps an issue with how certain system calls (syscalls) are handled when running foreign binaries. + +Looking at the possible categories: + +1. Instruction: This would involve a specific machine instruction causing issues. For example, if a particular ARM instruction isn't handled correctly by QEMU, it could crash. +2. Syscall: Problems with how system calls are implemented or handled in the emulator. If git is making a syscall that qemu-arm-static doesn't handle properly, this could lead to crashes. +3. Runtime: Other runtime errors not directly tied to instructions or syscalls, like memory management issues. + +Since "git clone -s" uses various system calls (like network operations, file I/O), it's likely that the issue is related to how QEMU handles these syscalls when emulating ARM on an x86 host. It might be that certain syscalls aren't properly translated or handled, leading to a segmentation fault. + +Alternatively, it could be a runtime error due to incorrect memory handling within the emulator when dealing with git's operations. However, since the crash happens specifically during a syscall-heavy operation like cloning a repository, I think the issue is more likely tied to how syscalls are being processed by qemu-arm-static. + +So, putting this together, the category would most likely be "syscall". + + +The issue occurs when handling system calls made by git clone, leading QEMU to crash. This points towards problems with syscall handling in the emulator. + +syscalls \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1869241 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1869241 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d872cd99f --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1869241 @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ + +Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let's break down the problem step by step. + +The user is encountering an error when using svn checkout on an ARM7 system emulated via qemu-arm-static. The error message is "E000075 Can't read directory '...': Value too large for defined data type." This happens consistently during their autobuild process. + +First, I should consider what each category entails: +- **Instruction**: This would involve a problem with an individual CPU instruction. If qemu was misinterpreting or executing an ARM7 instruction incorrectly, that could cause issues. +- **Syscall**: This relates to system calls made by the emulated process. If qemu isn't handling a particular syscall correctly on the host (AMD64), it might lead to such errors. +- **Runtime**: This would be other runtime issues not directly tied to instructions or syscalls, perhaps related to memory management, resource limits, etc. + +Looking at the error message: "Value too large for defined data type." This typically occurs when a value exceeds the maximum size allowed by a variable's definition. In programming terms, this could happen if, for example, a function expects an integer but receives a larger value than it can handle. + +In the context of SVN operations, reading a directory might involve retrieving file metadata or listing entries. The error suggests that some value returned from the system is too large for what svn expects. Now, considering the emulation layer, qemu-arm-static runs ARM7 code on an AMD64 host. + +When emulating syscalls, qemu translates them between the target (ARM) and host (AMD64) architectures. If there's a mismatch in how certain values are handled during this translation—like file handles or directory descriptors being too large for what the target expects—it could cause such errors. + +So, the problem likely arises when qemu is handling syscalls related to directory operations. It might be that the emulation isn't correctly translating the sizes or types of these system calls, leading to svn receiving values it can't process. + +Therefore, this issue falls under the **syscall** category because it's related to how system calls are being handled by qemu during the emulation process. + + +syscal \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1910605 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1910605 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..8d12ad635 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1910605 @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ + +Okay, so I'm trying to figure out this problem where using qemu-arm-static gives an error with ioctl USBDEVFS_BULK returning -1 and EFAULT (Bad address), but it works fine with qemu-aarch64-static. The user is running on a 64-bit Intel laptop. + +First, I need to understand what's going on here. The code snippet uses ioctl with the USBDEVFS_BULK command. The struct usbdevfs_bulktransfer is being set up, and then ioctl is called. On qemu-arm-static, this returns -1 with EFAULT, which usually means a bad address was accessed. But it works fine when using qemu-aarch64-static. + +Hmm, so why would the same code work on one emulator but not another? Let's think about the differences between arm and aarch64. ARM is 32-bit, while AArch64 is 64-bit. The user is running on a 64-bit Intel machine, so when they use qemu-aarch64-static, it's emulating a 64-bit system, which might be more straightforward because the host and guest are both 64-bit. But with qemu-arm-static, it's emulating a 32-bit ARM system on a 64-bit host. + +I remember that when dealing with pointers in 32-bit versus 64-bit environments, there can be issues with how addresses are handled. Maybe the struct usbdevfs_bulktransfer is being passed incorrectly in terms of alignment or size when running under the arm emulator. + +Looking at the code, Bulk.data is assigned (void *)pData. If pData isn't correctly aligned for a 32-bit pointer, or if there's an issue with how the data is copied between host and guest memory spaces, that could cause EFAULT. Another possibility is that the struct itself might have padding differences between 32-bit and 64-bit architectures, leading to misaligned data when passed into ioctl. + +Also, considering that qemu-arm-static is a user-mode emulator, it's possible there are issues with how syscalls like ioctl are handled in different modes (arm vs. aarch64). Maybe the syscall expects certain parameters or structures to be laid out differently for 32-bit compared to 64-bit, and in this case, the arm version isn't handling it correctly. + +So, putting this together, the issue seems related to how the ioctl system call is being handled by qemu-arm-static. It's causing a bad address error because of pointer or struct alignment issues specific to the 32-bit emulation on a 64-bit host. This points towards a syscall-related problem rather than an instruction-level fault or a runtime error elsewhere. + +Therefore, the category should be 'syscall' because it's related to how the ioctl system call is being executed and handled within the qemu-arm-static environment. + + +syscalls are involved in handling the ioctl command, leading to the EFAULT error. The issue arises from differences in pointer alignment between 32-bit and 64-bit environments. + +syscalls \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1926521 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1926521 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..5a8c91e73 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1926521 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ + +Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU. The issue is that when an application uses MADV_DONTNEED, QEMU isn't handling it correctly. Let me break down what's happening here. + +The user provided code where they map a page with MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, which means it's private and anonymous—so changes won't be reflected in any file. They write 'A' to the first byte of this mapped area. Then they call madvise with MADV_DONTNEED on that region. + +According to the man pages, after MADV_DONTNEED, accessing those pages should result in either reloading from a file (for shared mappings) or zero-filled pages for private anonymous mappings. In this case, since it's MAP_PRIVATE and anonymous, any access should get zeros because the OS can just drop the pages and refill them on next access with zeros. + +In the code, after calling madvise, they assert that *P is 0. On the host system, this works as expected, but when run under QEMU, it fails, meaning *P isn't zeroed out, causing an assertion failure. + +Looking at the QEMU code, in the syscall.c file, there's a comment saying MADV_DONTNEED is ignored because it's a hint. So QEMU just returns success without doing anything, which explains why the memory isn't cleared as expected. + +So this issue is about how QEMU handles a specific system call—madvise with MADV_DONTNEED. Since it's not correctly implementing the expected behavior of the madvise syscall, it falls under a syscall error category. + + +The bug report pertains to an incorrect handling of the `madvise` system call in QEMU when processing the `MADV_DONTNEED` advice, leading to unexpected memory behavior. + +**Answer:** The given bug is classified as a **syscall** issue. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2101 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2101 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..71d81c4a2 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2101 @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ + +Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let me read through the problem description carefully. + +The user is running `qemu-x86_64` on an aarch64 platform and executing the 'ls' command. They're getting incorrect results when they run it. The steps involve copying the ls binary and its dependencies from x86_64 to aarch64, then using qemu to execute it. + +Hmm, so what's happening here? Since they're using QEMU to emulate an x86_64 environment on an aarch64 host, any issues could be related to how the emulator is handling system calls or instructions from the binary. + +The problem occurs when executing 'ls -l /'. The expected behavior is for ls to list the root directory's contents correctly. If it's giving wrong results, maybe it's not reading the filesystem properly or there's an issue with how QEMU is handling file operations. + +I should consider possible causes. One possibility is that the system calls made by 'ls' are not being translated correctly by QEMU. For example, if certain syscalls aren't handled properly in the emulator when running on aarch64, that could lead to incorrect outputs. Alternatively, it might be an issue with how QEMU handles the file descriptors or directory listings. + +Another angle is whether the dependencies of 'ls' are correctly set up. If any shared libraries required by 'ls' aren't present or are incompatible in the x86_64 root directory on the aarch64 host, that could cause unexpected behavior. But the user mentioned copying all necessary so files, so perhaps that's not the issue. + +Looking at the categories: instruction issues would relate to specific CPU instructions not being emulated correctly. Syscall issues would be about system calls failing or returning incorrect data. Runtime errors are more general and happen during execution but aren't tied to a specific cause like syscalls or instructions. + +In this case, since 'ls' is relying on the filesystem operations which involve syscalls like readdir, open, etc., it's likely that QEMU isn't correctly translating these syscalls when running in an emulated environment. If those syscalls aren't handled properly, the output from 'ls' would be wrong. + +Therefore, the most probable category is "syscall" because the issue seems to stem from incorrect handling of system calls made by the x86_64 binary on the aarch64 host via QEMU. + + +The issue likely arises from how QEMU handles system calls for file operations in an emulated environment. Incorrect syscall translation could cause 'ls' to produce wrong results. + +syscalls \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2122 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2122 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..87c5b4bae --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2122 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ + +Alright, I'm looking at this bug report about QEMU-user-static causing a segfault when running ldconfig on an x86_64 host with an arm64 client. The user provided steps to reproduce: downloading an Ubuntu Jammy arm64 rootfs, mounting it with /proc from the host, and then executing an apt uninstall that triggers libc-bin processing. + +Hmm, I need to classify this bug into one of three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let me think about each category. + +"Instruction" would involve a specific faulty command or instruction in the code causing the issue. "Syscall" relates to errors when interacting with system calls. "Runtime" is for other runtime errors that don't fall into the first two. + +In this case, the segfault occurs during the execution of ldconfig via apt processing. Since it's happening while running a process on the emulated arm64 environment, and given that QEMU-user-static handles CPU emulation, it's likely a problem with how system calls are being handled between the host and guest architectures. + +So, I think this is related to syscalls because ldconfig might be making certain system calls that aren't being translated correctly by QEMU. Therefore, the category should be "syscall." + + +The bug occurs during system call handling between the host and guest architectures when running ldconfig via apt. This points to a syscall-related issue. + +sys \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2262 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2262 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b3dea6272 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2262 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ + +Alright, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user is having an issue with QEMU's Linux-user mode emulation for RISC-V32. They mentioned that when they run background jobs in a chroot environment, the shell hangs indefinitely. + +Looking at the details, they provided two code examples: `simple_shell.c` and `loop.c`. From what I understand, the shell is supposed to handle background processes by using `wait4` or `waitpid`, but it's not working as expected on RISC-V32 under QEMU. + +The strace output shows that there are repeated calls to `waitid` with flags like WNOHANG, which means it's checking for any completed child processes without blocking. The fact that it returns 0 repeatedly suggests that no processes are completing or being signaled correctly, leading the shell to loop indefinitely. + +In their reproducer, they mention that when they run a background job (like `./loop &`), the shell incorrectly reports that the job is done and then gets stuck in an infinite loop. The output shows `wait4 ret: 98298`, which doesn't make sense because on x86_64 or RISC-V64, it should return 0. + +So, considering the categories provided—instruction, syscall, runtime—the issue seems to revolve around how QEMU is handling system calls related to process management. Specifically, `waitid` and `wait4` are syscalls that aren't behaving as expected under emulation for RISC-V32. This would fall under a problem with system call handling in QEMU. + +Therefore, the category should be 'syscall' because it's an error in how these particular syscalls are being processed. + + +The issue pertains to incorrect handling of `waitid` and `wait4` syscalls in QEMU's RISC-V32 emulation, causing background processes not to be managed properly. This is a system call-related problem. + +sys \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2333 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2333 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..bd7b07487 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2333 @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ + +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let's break down what's happening here. + +The user is reporting that when they run their program under qemu-armeb (which emulates an ARM big-endian system), it crashes with a segmentation fault. They've identified that the issue occurs in the __clock_gettime64() function, specifically at line 42 of clock_gettime.c where it calls INTERNAL_VSYSCALL_CALL for vdso_time64. + +Looking at the stack trace, the crash happens during this VDSO call. The user also mentions that when they disable VDSO by rebuilding glibc without it, the problem goes away. This suggests that the issue is related to how QEMU handles the VDSO (Virtual Dynamic Shared Object) for ARM big-endian. + +VDSO is used to speed up certain system calls by handling them in userspace instead of making a full syscall into the kernel. If something's wrong with how QEMU implements this, it could cause crashes. + +The problem occurs only on qemu-armeb and not on qemu-arm (little endian), which indicates that there might be an endianness issue or some specific handling in QEMU for big-endian systems that isn't working correctly. + +Now, considering the categories: + +1. **Instruction**: This would involve a faulty instruction being executed. The crash is happening during a VDSO call, but it's not clear if the instruction itself is wrong. +2. **Syscall**: Issues with system calls could be related to how QEMU handles them, especially in big-endian mode. Since VDSO is part of optimizing syscalls, this might fit. +3. **Runtime**: This would cover other runtime errors not related to instructions or syscalls directly. + +Since the problem arises during a syscall (or rather, an optimized version via VDSO) and it's specific to how QEMU handles this in big-endian mode, I think the category is **syscall** because it's about the handling of system calls within the emulator. + + +The bug report deals with how QEMU handles the VDSO for ARM big-endian systems during a syscall optimization. Therefore, the issue falls under the syscall category. + +syscalls \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2410 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2410 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c4fd23311 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2410 @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ + +Okay, let's try to figure out what category this bug falls into. The user is having an issue where setting socket options on RISC-V QEMU gives a "Protocol not available" error, whereas it works fine on x64 Linux. + +So, first, looking at the problem description: they're using setsockopt with IP_OPTIONS on a SOCK_STREAM socket. According to the man page, this should work. But in QEMU, it's failing. The user also provided a link to the QEMU source showing that the relevant path is unimplemented. + +Hmm, so the error occurs when making a system call (setsockopt) which isn't properly handled by the emulator for RISC-V. That suggests it's not an issue with the application code itself but how QEMU handles this particular syscall on this architecture. + +Looking at the possible categories: instruction issues relate to specific CPU instructions; runtime errors are other runtime problems. But here, it's clearly a problem with handling a system call in the emulator. So the category is 'syscall'. + + +The issue arises from how QEMU handles the setsockopt syscall on RISC-V, leading to an unimplemented path error. + +**Answer:** +sys \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2446 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2446 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..78442028c --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2446 @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ + +Alright, let's break down this problem. The user is reporting an issue where QEMU isn't handling the `set_robust_list` system call properly. They've provided a test program that works on native Linux but fails when run in QEMU. + +First, I'll look at what `set_robust_list` does. It's used by glibc for robust mutexes, which are important for thread safety across process boundaries. If this syscall isn't implemented correctly in QEMU, applications relying on it will fail. + +The test program shows that on native Linux, both calls to `set_robust_list` work as expected. But when run in QEMU, the second call fails with "Function not implemented," indicating that QEMU doesn't support this system call at all. This means any application depending on robust mutexes won't function correctly under QEMU. + +Looking deeper, glibc uses `set_robust_list` during initialization to check for robust list support. If it's missing, functions like `pthread_mutex_init` with robust attributes will return `ENOTSUP`, preventing the use of these mutex types. This is critical because robust mutexes are vital for reliable process synchronization. + +Since QEMU emulates a system, it should accurately implement all necessary system calls to ensure compatibility. The absence of `set_robust_list` breaks this compatibility, especially for applications that rely on pthread robust features. + +So, the issue here is a missing or improperly implemented system call in QEMU's Linux user mode emulation. This directly affects runtime behavior because applications can't use certain pthread functionalities when running under QEMU. + + +The bug report describes an issue where the `set_robust_list` system call is not properly handled by QEMU, leading to errors when applications try to use it. Since this relates to a specific system call implementation in QEMU, the category is: + +**syscall** + +The error occurs because the `set_robust_list` syscall isn't implemented in QEMU's user mode emulation for Linux targets. This affects applications that rely on robust mutexes provided by glibc, such as those using named locks or process-shared mutexes. + +To fix this, QEMU needs to implement the `set_robust_list` system call correctly in its Linux user mode codebase to ensure compatibility with applications expecting this functionality. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2553 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2553 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..7be7e3d29 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2553 @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ + +Alright, I'm looking at this bug report and trying to figure out what's going on. The user has code that joins an IP multicast group, but when they try to emulate it using QEMU for a 64-bit PowerPC system, it fails with ENODEV. They suspect the issue is related to how the `imr_ifindex` field in the `struct ip_mreqn` is handled during emulation. + +First, I need to understand what's happening here. The user provided their code, which works on a native x86_64 system but fails under QEMU emulation for PowerPC64. When they run it, the `setsockopt` call returns an error because the `imr_ifindex` isn't valid. + +Looking at the QEMU source code in `linux-user/syscall_defs.h`, I see that `struct target_ip_mreqn` uses `abi_long` for `imr_ifindex`. On PowerPC64, `long` is 64 bits, but on Linux, `imr_ifindex` should be a 32-bit integer. So the problem arises because QEMU isn't correctly marshaling this field when passing it to the host system call. + +The user also mentions that in the code, there's a check for `optlen` which allows sizes between `target_ip_mreq` (8 bytes) and `target_ip_mreqn` (16 bytes). However, the actual size is 12 bytes, causing QEMU to pass uninitialized data as part of the struct. This leads to an invalid `imr_ifindex`, hence the ENODEV error. + +So, breaking it down: + +- The issue is related to how system calls are handled by QEMU when emulating a different architecture. +- The problem occurs during the marshaling process of structs between target and host architectures. +- It's specifically about the `setsockopt` syscall not handling the struct correctly. + +Given these points, I think this falls under the "syscall" category because it involves an error with how system calls are implemented in QEMU. The problem isn't a faulty instruction or a runtime error but rather incorrect handling of a system call parameter. + + +The bug report describes an issue where the `setsockopt` syscall fails due to incorrect struct marshaling for IP multicast on emulated 64-bit PowerPC systems. This is related to how QEMU handles system calls and their parameters, specifically the `struct ip_mreqn`. + +sys +call \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/570 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/570 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..439379a73 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/570 @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ + +Okay, I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report from QEMU. The warning message says "TIOCSER_TEMT" is redefined in termbits.h at line 276. Hmm, TIOCSER_TEMT sounds like a termios constant used in serial port operations. + +I remember that the termios structure is related to terminal settings and I/O control operations. So, if this macro is being redefined, it's probably an issue with how certain system calls are handled or defined within QEMU. + +Looking at the possible categories: instruction, syscall, runtime. Since the warning is about a preprocessor symbol being redefined, which relates to system call definitions (like ioctl commands), I think this falls under the 'syscall' category. It's not an error in a specific instruction execution nor a general runtime error but rather an issue with how syscalls are set up or defined. + + +The bug report involves a redefinition warning of a termios constant, which relates to system call definitions. + +sys \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/602 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/602 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ba2a107ad --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/602 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ + +Okay, I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let me read through the problem description carefully. + +The issue is about translating host error numbers to target error numbers in IP_RECVERR and IPV6_RECVERR control messages. The user mentioned that `ee_errno` isn't translated, leading to mismatches between host (like x86_64) and guest (e.g., MIPS) systems. For example, ECONNREFUSED is 111 on the host but should be 146 on MIPS. + +Looking at the provided code snippet, it seems they're adjusting how error numbers are handled in system calls. The fix involves translating the errno using `host_to_target_errno`. + +Now, considering the categories: 'instruction' would relate to specific CPU instructions or assembly issues. This doesn't seem related since it's about error handling in syscalls. 'Runtime' could involve general runtime errors but isn't specific enough here. The problem is specifically with system calls and their error translations, so 'syscall' seems appropriate. + +Thus, the category should be 'syscall'. + + +The bug report deals with translating error numbers in system call messages, which falls under system call handling. + +sysc \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/817 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/817 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..028116ce4 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/817 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ + +Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU. The issue mentioned is about the 'waitid' function leaving the target siginfo uninitialized when info.si_pid is zero. Hmm, waitid is a system call in Linux used to wait for a child process and get information about its termination. + +So, the problem here seems to be related to how the siginfo structure is handled after using waitid. If si_pid is zero, that might mean the process ID isn't being set correctly or perhaps it's indicating some error condition where the info isn't properly initialized. + +Since the issue revolves around a system call (waitid) and its handling of the siginfo structure, I think this falls under a syscall category. The bug isn't about an instruction in code being wrong, nor is it a runtime error that occurs elsewhere during execution—it's specifically about how the system call interacts with data structures. + +Therefore, the category should be 'syscall'. + + +The bug report discusses an issue related to the waitid system call and its handling of siginfo. Therefore, it falls under the syscall category. + +sys \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/829 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/829 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..51898ec59 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/829 @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ + +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let me read through the problem description again to understand what's going on. + +The user is reporting an issue when running a test program under qemu-arm. The test involves creating a file in /tmp and then opening it using openat(). They mention that strace shows the path being prefixed with the sysroot, which is causing problems. Specifically, when they call openat(tmpfd, tmpfile_name), it fails because the fd points to a sysroot-prefixed path instead of just /tmp. + +So the problem arises from how the user space emulation in QEMU handles certain system calls, particularly those involving file paths and opening files. The issue seems to be related to path translation when using openat(), which relies on file descriptors that might have been modified by QEMU's sysroot handling. + +Looking at the categories: + +- Instruction: This would involve a problem with specific CPU instructions being incorrectly handled. +- Syscall: Issues related to system calls, possibly incorrect implementation or handling in the emulator. +- Runtime: Other runtime errors not covered by the above two. + +The problem here is specifically about how certain syscalls (like openat()) are being manipulated when using the sysroot. This points towards an issue with how these system calls are handled in the emulation layer, which would fall under syscall issues. + +Therefore, the bug report should be classified as a 'syscall' category. + + +The issue arises from incorrect handling of system calls related to path translation in user space emulation, specifically affecting `openat()` and file descriptors. This falls under the category of syscall errors. + +syscalls \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/833 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/833 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..18febe9ff --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/833 @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ + +Alright, I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report into one of the given categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let's break down what's happening here. + +The problem is about the `sendmsg` system call failing in QEMU when there's no iov but ancillary data is present. In a normal Linux environment, it works fine, but under QEMU, the message without iov isn't sent, which causes issues for applications like the `ell` library that rely on this functionality. + +Looking at the steps to reproduce, they mention using `strace` and seeing that in QEMU, one of the `sendmsg` calls is missing. This suggests that QEMU isn't handling the `sendmsg` call correctly when the message has no data but includes ancillary information. + +The key point here is that the issue revolves around how QEMU handles a specific system call (`sendmsg`) with certain parameters. It's not about an incorrect instruction being executed or a runtime error like a segmentation fault; it's more about the syscall itself not behaving as expected in the emulator. + +So, considering the categories: + +- **Instruction**: This would relate to processor-level issues or incorrect assembly instructions, which doesn't seem to be the case here. +- **Syscall**: This involves how system calls are handled by the kernel or emulator. Since `sendmsg` is a syscall and the issue is about its behavior in QEMU, this fits. +- **Runtime**: This would cover errors that occur during program execution but aren't tied to specific syscalls. Again, since the problem is specifically with `sendmsg`, it's more aligned with syscall issues. + +Therefore, the bug is likely related to how QEMU emulates the `sendmsg` system call when certain parameters are provided. + + +The issue pertains to how the `sendmsg` system call is handled in QEMU under specific conditions. This falls under how the system call is processed rather than an instruction-level or runtime error. + +sys \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/911 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/911 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..859f5cec9 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/911 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ + +Okay, so I'm looking at this bug report about QEMU not showing execve calls when using strace on a mipsel user-mode application. The user built QEMU from source, specifically version 6.2.0 and a later snapshot 6.2.90, with some specific configure options. They're trying to trace system calls made by their test application, which uses both system() and popen(), but the strace output doesn't show execve. + +Hmm, I remember that execve is a syscall that's used when executing a new program. It replaces the current process image, so it doesn't return on success—it instead starts the new program. That could explain why tracing it might be tricky because if the call succeeds, the tracer wouldn't see the return. + +Looking at the provided logs, in version 4.2.1 of QEMU, the execve calls do appear in the strace output. But in versions 6.2.0 and 6.2.90, they don't. So something changed between these versions that affects how QEMU handles tracing for this specific syscall. + +I'm thinking about what could cause this change. Maybe there were modifications to how QEMU intercepts syscalls or handles the execution flow after an execve. Perhaps a bug was introduced in handling strace for syscalls that don't return, like execve. + +Another angle is how safe_execve works. The user mentioned that it's not returning, which makes sense because execve doesn't return on success. But older versions could still capture the call. So maybe there was a regression where the tracing mechanism relies on the syscall returning to log it, but for execve, this isn't possible. + +So categorizing this bug: It's related to how QEMU handles syscalls during execution. Specifically, it's an issue with the strace functionality not capturing execve calls correctly. Since it's about a system call and its tracing, the category should be 'syscall'. + + +The bug is related to the failure in capturing `execve` system calls when using strace in QEMU's mipsel user mode. This issue pertains to how QEMU handles syscalls during execution. + +sys \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/957 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/957 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d6dd0eb2d --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/957 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ + +Okay, I need to figure out what category this bug falls into. The user provided a detailed problem where Python crashes during a rebuild using qemu-m68k. The error message is "The futex facility returned an unexpected error code." + +Looking at the log, it seems like there are multiple threads causing issues with futex calls. Futex is a system call used for synchronization in multi-threaded applications. The error message suggests that when the futex function returns an unexpected value, it's triggering an abort. + +The problem occurs during Python builds, which can be resource-intensive and involve many threads. The user mentioned that using MAKEOPTS=-j1 reduces the issue probability, implying concurrency is a factor. Also, running with qemu -systrace or QEMU_STRACE=1 decreases the error occurrence but not entirely. + +The logs show several futex calls with different operations (FUTEX_WAIT, FUTEX_WAKE, etc.), and some return errors like "Invalid argument." This indicates that the system is receiving unexpected results from these syscalls. + +Since the issue arises from how syscalls (specifically futex) are being handled by qemu-m68k, it's likely a problem with the syscall implementation in QEMU, not an instruction-level bug or a runtime error unrelated to syscalls. + +So, the category should be 'syscall' because it involves errors during system calls. + + +The issue is related to errors occurring during system calls (specifically futex) within the qemu-m68k environment. The problem arises from unexpected return values in these syscalls, leading to runtime failures. + +syscalls \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/982 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/982 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b26afe5f1 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/982 @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ + +Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report about QEMU's --strace incorrectly decoding writev arguments on 32-bit machines when running 64-bit binaries. Let me go through the information step by step. + +The user provided a description where using strace with QEMU shows incorrect decoding of the writev system call arguments for 64-bit binaries on a 32-bit machine. The steps to reproduce include compiling the same code for different architectures and then running them under QEMU with strace. When they run strace, the output for writev is wrong in certain cases. + +Looking at the outputs: + +- For i686-main (32-bit), strace shows correct decoding. +- For x86_64-main (64-bit on a 64-bit host), strace also shows correct decoding with the nil pointer and address. +- But when using qemu-i386 --strace on the i686-main, it incorrectly decodes the arguments as addresses instead of showing the actual data. Similarly, for aarch64, it's not showing correctly. + +So the problem seems to be that QEMU is misinterpreting how the writev system call's arguments are being passed when running 64-bit binaries on a 32-bit emulator with --strace. This affects how strace displays the arguments, making them look like memory addresses instead of the actual data structures. + +Now, I need to categorize this bug. The options are instruction, syscall, or runtime. + +- Instruction: If it were an issue with a specific CPU instruction being wrong. +- Syscall: An error in handling system calls, possibly misinterpretation of parameters. +- Runtime: Other runtime errors not related to instructions or syscalls. + +This seems to be a problem with how QEMU handles the decoding of system call arguments for writev when using --strace. Since writev is a syscall and the issue arises during its processing under strace, it's likely a syscall-related error in the emulation. The incorrect display suggests that the arguments are not being parsed correctly by the strace mechanism in QEMU. + +So I think this falls under 'syscall' because it involves misdecoding the parameters of a system call when tracing. + + +The bug report is about incorrect decoding of writev's arguments during --strace, which relates to how syscalls are handled. + +syscalls \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/analysis.csv b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/analysis.csv index cb42304d5..6f887e0ec 100644 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/analysis.csv +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/analysis.csv @@ -1,4 +1,3 @@ category, count -instruction, 113 -manual-review, 2 +instruction, 115 runtime, 4 diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/categories.csv b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/categories.csv index 25384563c..1c6ed32f3 100644 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/categories.csv +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/categories.csv @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ category, count -manual-review, 34 -instruction, 191 -syscall, 76 -runtime, 250 +instruction, 196 +runtime, 265 +manual-review, 8 +syscall, 82 diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1156313 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1156313 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..17a35d8c1 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1156313 @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +The bug report describes issues related to improper handling of flags on x86-64, specifically mentioning the ADX feature and providing a test case involving assembly instructions (ADOX and ADCX). The problem seems to stem from how QEMU manages CPU flags during context switches, which affects instruction execution. Therefore, it falls under the category where a faulty instruction is described. + +**instruction** + +The bug report discusses improper handling of specific x86-64 instructions (ADOX and ADCX) within the QEMU emulator. It provides an example test case that demonstrates incorrect behavior when these instructions are executed in a virtualized environment. The issue appears to be related to how QEMU manages CPU flags, leading to unexpected results or system instability. + +The category **instruction** is appropriate because the problem is directly tied to the execution of specific assembly instructions and their handling within the emulator, indicating a potential fault in how these instructions are processed by QEMU. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1267955 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1267955 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b2294aadc --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1267955 @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +The issue involves the behavior of the XOR instruction affecting the parity flag in QEMU's i386 emulation. The bug is related to how the emulator handles specific instructions and their impact on CPU flags. + +**Step-by-step explanation:** + +1. **Reproduction Steps:** + - A program was created with machine code that includes `xor %eax, %eax` followed by other instructions. + - Running this program directly outputs `0x46`. + - Running it under QEMU's i386 emulator outputs `0x42`. + +2. **Analysis of the XOR Instruction:** + - The `xor %eax, %eax` instruction sets `%eax` to 0 and affects CPU flags. + - In this case, the parity flag (`PF`) should be set because the result is zero. + +3. **Parity Flag Behavior:** + - The parity flag is set based on whether there are an even number of 1s in the lower byte of the result. + - Zero (0x00) has all bits as 0, which results in even parity, so `PF` should be set. + +4. **Issue Identification:** + - When using `xor %eax, %eax`, QEMU does not correctly set the parity flag, leading to unexpected behavior. + - Replacing it with `sub %eax, %eax` (which also sets `%eax` to 0) works as expected. + +5. **Conclusion:** + - The problem lies in how QEMU handles the XOR instruction's effect on the parity flag compared to other instructions that produce the same result. + +**Answer:** + +The bug is classified under the `instruction` category because it relates to how a specific instruction (XOR) affects CPU flags within QEMU. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1541 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1541 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c43611b5c --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1541 @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +The problem is related to how attributes are applied in C++. The `G_NORETURN` macro expands to `[[noreturn]]`, which is an attribute specifier. In C++, attribute specifiers must appear in specific positions, typically before the return type or after certain keywords like `extern`. Placing `extern` after `G_NORETURN` causes a syntax error because it's not valid for the attribute to come after the storage class specifier. + +To fix this, you should switch the order of `extern` and `G_NORETURN`, placing the attribute before `extern`. + +This issue is related to **instruction** as it involves incorrect usage of language features leading to compilation errors. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1737444 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1737444 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d0b09673c --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1737444 @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +The crash occurs when running a conftest program on qemu-sh4 that works correctly on a real SH7785LCR board. The issue seems to be related to how the setcontext function is handled in QEMU for the SH4 architecture. + +Looking at the provided code, it's using `ucontext.h` and `pthread.h`, which are standard libraries for context switching and threading. The test sets up a thread with TLS (Thread Local Storage) and uses `makecontext` and `setcontext` to switch execution contexts. + +The error message from QEMU indicates an "Unhandled trap: 0x180" at the instruction pointer `pc=0x7f69235e`. This suggests that during the execution of the context switch, an unexpected exception or interrupt is being triggered. On the real hardware, this doesn't happen, implying that either QEMU's emulation isn't handling the SH4 architecture correctly in this scenario or there's a bug in how the setcontext function is implemented or used. + +Given that the problem arises during runtime when executing specific instructions (the context switch), and since it works on real hardware but not in QEMU, it points towards an issue with QEMU's handling of the SH4 architecture for certain operations, possibly related to exception handling or stack switching. + +Therefore, this bug falls under the **instruction** category as it involves a problem with how instructions are executed in the emulator. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/449 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/449 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b1ab40090 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/449 @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +The bug report describes an assertion failure when running a Go program that uses vector instructions on s390x under QEMU. The issue is traced to specific patches applied to QEMU's master branch. The crash occurs during runtime due to an assertion in the vector instruction handling, which suggests it's related to how instructions are translated or executed. + +**Category: instruction** + +The error arises from faulty instruction translation or execution within QEMU, specifically for s390x vector operations. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1072 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1072 deleted file mode 100644 index 417f3887d..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1072 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,9 +0,0 @@ -The issue described involves differences in behavior when running QEMU directly versus using a remote debugger (GDB). The problem is related to how file descriptors are handled, specifically whether `stdout` is recognized as a character special device (`S_ISCHR`). - -This seems to be related to how the file descriptor for `stdout` is set up differently when debugging. When running under GDB, certain behaviors or setups might differ compared to standalone execution. - -The category of this bug would likely fall under: - -**runtime** - -Since it's an issue that occurs during runtime and relates to file descriptor handling and behavior differences between debugged and non-debugged executions. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1156313 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1156313 deleted file mode 100644 index 17a35d8c1..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1156313 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,7 +0,0 @@ -The bug report describes issues related to improper handling of flags on x86-64, specifically mentioning the ADX feature and providing a test case involving assembly instructions (ADOX and ADCX). The problem seems to stem from how QEMU manages CPU flags during context switches, which affects instruction execution. Therefore, it falls under the category where a faulty instruction is described. - -**instruction** - -The bug report discusses improper handling of specific x86-64 instructions (ADOX and ADCX) within the QEMU emulator. It provides an example test case that demonstrates incorrect behavior when these instructions are executed in a virtualized environment. The issue appears to be related to how QEMU manages CPU flags, leading to unexpected results or system instability. - -The category **instruction** is appropriate because the problem is directly tied to the execution of specific assembly instructions and their handling within the emulator, indicating a potential fault in how these instructions are processed by QEMU. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1267955 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1267955 deleted file mode 100644 index b2294aadc..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1267955 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,27 +0,0 @@ -The issue involves the behavior of the XOR instruction affecting the parity flag in QEMU's i386 emulation. The bug is related to how the emulator handles specific instructions and their impact on CPU flags. - -**Step-by-step explanation:** - -1. **Reproduction Steps:** - - A program was created with machine code that includes `xor %eax, %eax` followed by other instructions. - - Running this program directly outputs `0x46`. - - Running it under QEMU's i386 emulator outputs `0x42`. - -2. **Analysis of the XOR Instruction:** - - The `xor %eax, %eax` instruction sets `%eax` to 0 and affects CPU flags. - - In this case, the parity flag (`PF`) should be set because the result is zero. - -3. **Parity Flag Behavior:** - - The parity flag is set based on whether there are an even number of 1s in the lower byte of the result. - - Zero (0x00) has all bits as 0, which results in even parity, so `PF` should be set. - -4. **Issue Identification:** - - When using `xor %eax, %eax`, QEMU does not correctly set the parity flag, leading to unexpected behavior. - - Replacing it with `sub %eax, %eax` (which also sets `%eax` to 0) works as expected. - -5. **Conclusion:** - - The problem lies in how QEMU handles the XOR instruction's effect on the parity flag compared to other instructions that produce the same result. - -**Answer:** - -The bug is classified under the `instruction` category because it relates to how a specific instruction (XOR) affects CPU flags within QEMU. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1311614 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1311614 deleted file mode 100644 index f2f265b0d..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1311614 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,7 +0,0 @@ -The issue involves `qemu-arm` segfaulting when using GCC 4.9.0. The problem arose after upgrading from GCC 4.8.3 to 4.9.0 and was resolved by reverting to the older version. This suggests a compatibility issue between `qemu-arm` and GCC 4.9.0, likely related to how the compiler generates code or interacts with the emulator. - -Given that the segfault occurs during runtime when running commands like `rpm`, it's not an instruction-level fault nor is it directly tied to a syscall error. Instead, it's an issue that arises during the execution of programs compiled with GCC 4.9.0 within the QEMU environment. - -**runtime** - -The problem falls under the "runtime" category because it occurs during the execution of software after compilation, indicating issues in how the emulator handles the code produced by the newer compiler version. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1346769 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1346769 deleted file mode 100644 index a2215794d..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1346769 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,13 +0,0 @@ -The issue arises because the QEMU emulator isn't correctly handling the `/proc/self/maps` file for 32-bit guests running under a 64-bit QEMU environment. Specifically, when address sanitizer (Asan) is used in such a setup, it fails to find stack boundaries, leading to an error during initialization. - -Looking at the provided code snippet from `linux-user/syscall.c`, it seems that only certain architectures (like ARM and M68K) have support for writing stack information into `/proc/self/maps`. However, this functionality is missing for other targets like x86_32, which causes Asan to fail when trying to determine the stack boundaries. - -This problem is not isolated; there was a previous report related to system maps not being hidden properly in QEMU. The current issue likely stems from similar root causes, where the handling of process maps isn't consistent across all architectures. - -To classify this bug: - -- **Instruction:** No specific instruction-level issues are mentioned. -- **Syscall:** The problem relates to how `/proc/self/maps` is handled during syscalls, particularly when Asan relies on it for stack information. -- **Runtime:** While the error occurs at runtime, the root cause is more tied to how QEMU implements certain system calls. - -Given that the issue is centered around how QEMU manages the `/proc/self/maps` file and reports stack boundaries (or lack thereof), it falls under the `syscall` category because it involves errors in handling system call-related functionalities specific to process mapping. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1388 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1388 deleted file mode 100644 index 7bec862a4..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1388 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,9 +0,0 @@ -The issue reported is about the absence of Windows installers for QEMU 7.2.0 on specific repositories. This does not directly relate to an instruction error, a syscall error, or a runtime error. Instead, it pertains to the availability of distribution files. - -However, since the categories provided are limited to "instruction," "syscall," and "runtime," and none of these fit the issue described, I need to choose the closest category based on the possible interpretations. - -Given that the issue is about missing installers which could be seen as a runtime problem (since it affects the installation process), I will classify it under: - -**runtime** - -This classification assumes that the absence of installers impacts the ability to run QEMU properly, even though it's more about distribution rather than an error during execution. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1416988 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1416988 deleted file mode 100644 index c2397bbaa..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1416988 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,31 +0,0 @@ -The issue arises because the `siginfo` structure size differs between the Linux kernel and QEMU's implementation. This leads to an incorrect handling of signals when running binaries under QEMU that rely on proper signal information, such as during stack unwinding. - -To fix this, we need to adjust how `SI_PAD_SIZE` is calculated in QEMU's header file to match the Linux kernel's definition. The correct calculation should account for the preamble size and ensure that the structure padding aligns with what the kernel expects. - -Here is the corrected patch: - -```diff ---- a/linux-user/syscall_defs.h -+++ b/linux-user/syscall_defs.h -@@ -103,7 +103,8 @@ enum target_si_code { - #define TARGET_SI_NOINFO (TARGET_SI_MAX_USER) - #endif - --#define TARGET_SI_PAD_SIZE ((TARGET_SI_MAX_SIZE/sizeof(int)) - 3) -+#define __ARCH_SI_PREAMBLE_SIZE (4 * sizeof(int)) -+#define TARGET_SI_PAD_SIZE ((TARGET_SI_MAX_SIZE - __ARCH_SI_PREAMBLE_SIZE) / sizeof(int)) - - #ifndef TARGET_SI_FDSIZE - #define TARGET_SI_FDSIZE (TARGET_SI_FBITS/SIZEOF_LONG) -``` - -This adjustment ensures that the `siginfo` structure within QEMU aligns with the one used by the Linux kernel, resolving the signal handling issues and preventing segmentation faults or infinite loops during stack unwinding operations. - -After applying this patch, rebuild QEMU to incorporate these changes. - - -The bug report describes an issue related to incorrect signal handling in the QEMU-aarch64 emulator due to a mismatch between the `siginfo` structure sizes used by the Linux kernel and QEMU. Specifically, the size of `struct target_siginfo` in QEMU is larger than that of `struct siginfo` in the kernel, leading to problems such as segmentation faults or infinite loops when running certain applications. - -**Category: runtime** - -The issue occurs during runtime when handling signals, which is why it falls under the "runtime" category. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1462640 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1462640 deleted file mode 100644 index a614464ac..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1462640 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,3 +0,0 @@ -The bug report describes an issue where `shmat()` fails when running a 32-bit guest program on a 64-bit host using QEMU. The problem arises due to conflicting `mmap` flags—specifically, the initial mapping uses `MAP_PRIVATE`, and `shmat()` attempts to use `MAP_SHARED`, which is not allowed. - -The issue can be classified as a **runtime** error because it occurs during the execution of the program when interacting with shared memory. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1541 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1541 deleted file mode 100644 index c43611b5c..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1541 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,5 +0,0 @@ -The problem is related to how attributes are applied in C++. The `G_NORETURN` macro expands to `[[noreturn]]`, which is an attribute specifier. In C++, attribute specifiers must appear in specific positions, typically before the return type or after certain keywords like `extern`. Placing `extern` after `G_NORETURN` causes a syntax error because it's not valid for the attribute to come after the storage class specifier. - -To fix this, you should switch the order of `extern` and `G_NORETURN`, placing the attribute before `extern`. - -This issue is related to **instruction** as it involves incorrect usage of language features leading to compilation errors. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1594394 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1594394 deleted file mode 100644 index ffb370a0b..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1594394 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,6 +0,0 @@ -The issue arises from the use of setreuid() or setegid() functions within user-mode x86_64 code execution under QEMU. These functions are implemented using a signal-based mechanism in NPTL (Native POSIX Threads Library) to invoke syscalls indirectly. Specifically, they utilize a temporary data structure (__xidcmd) and trigger a real-time signal (SIGRT1). However, when running under QEMU, this process causes a segmentation fault because __xidcmd remains uninitialized (null), leading to an invalid memory access during the signal handler execution. - -The classification of this bug is related to how system calls are handled within the user-mode emulation provided by QEMU. The problem occurs at runtime due to improper handling of the internal NPTL mechanisms used for privilege changes, resulting in a crash when attempting to manipulate thread IDs via setreuid() or setegid(). This indicates an issue with how syscalls related to user and group IDs are being processed under certain conditions within the QEMU environment. - -**Answer:** -The bug is classified under **"runtime"** as it pertains to errors occurring during runtime, specifically due to improper handling of system calls related to thread ID changes in a multi-threaded environment under QEMU's emulation. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1716767 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1716767 deleted file mode 100644 index 134abca00..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1716767 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,5 +0,0 @@ -The issue occurs when using `file(1)` on an SH4 QEMU user emulator with an ELF file, resulting in "Invalid argument". Debugging shows overflown values during processing. This suggests a problem within the QEMU environment rather than with `file` itself. - -**runtime** - -The error happens at runtime within the QEMU emulation context when trying to read the elf file, indicating it's not related to instruction execution or syscalls but an issue in how the emulator handles certain operations. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1737444 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1737444 deleted file mode 100644 index d0b09673c..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1737444 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,9 +0,0 @@ -The crash occurs when running a conftest program on qemu-sh4 that works correctly on a real SH7785LCR board. The issue seems to be related to how the setcontext function is handled in QEMU for the SH4 architecture. - -Looking at the provided code, it's using `ucontext.h` and `pthread.h`, which are standard libraries for context switching and threading. The test sets up a thread with TLS (Thread Local Storage) and uses `makecontext` and `setcontext` to switch execution contexts. - -The error message from QEMU indicates an "Unhandled trap: 0x180" at the instruction pointer `pc=0x7f69235e`. This suggests that during the execution of the context switch, an unexpected exception or interrupt is being triggered. On the real hardware, this doesn't happen, implying that either QEMU's emulation isn't handling the SH4 architecture correctly in this scenario or there's a bug in how the setcontext function is implemented or used. - -Given that the problem arises during runtime when executing specific instructions (the context switch), and since it works on real hardware but not in QEMU, it points towards an issue with QEMU's handling of the SH4 architecture for certain operations, possibly related to exception handling or stack switching. - -Therefore, this bug falls under the **instruction** category as it involves a problem with how instructions are executed in the emulator. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1776478 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1776478 deleted file mode 100644 index 8c96946ee..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1776478 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,3 +0,0 @@ -The issue seems to be related to the use of `qemu-arm-static` for cross-compiling LV2 plugins on an ARMv6 architecture (like Raspberry Pi Zero) while the code is intended for ARMv7. The error occurs when running `lv2_ttl_generator`, which is part of DISTRHO-Ports. - -The classification would be **runtime**, as the problem happens during runtime execution within QEMU, specifically related to threading and mutex operations that aren't handled correctly in the cross-compilation environment. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1777226 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1777226 deleted file mode 100644 index 51a82e6c4..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1777226 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,7 +0,0 @@ -The problem described involves warnings emitted by `qemu-user` that interfere with userland applications' output. The user suggests that these warnings should be directed to a log file instead of stdout/stderr. - -**Category: runtime** - -Reasoning: -- This is an issue related to runtime behavior, specifically how warnings are handled during the execution of QEMU. -- It doesn't pertain to faulty instructions or syscalls but rather to runtime logging and output management. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1783362 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1783362 deleted file mode 100644 index 076ae9ab0..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1783362 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,5 +0,0 @@ -The bug report describes an issue where `mmap` returns success (NULL, 0) instead of failure (MAP_FAILED, -1) when len==0 in QEMU-user. This is related to how syscalls are handled in the emulator. - -**syscalls** - -This is a syscall error because it involves incorrect handling of the mmap system call within the QEMU environment. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1785203 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1785203 deleted file mode 100644 index b7249fd72..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1785203 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,5 +0,0 @@ -The bug report involves an assertion failure related to memory mapping during a system call (`mincore`). Specifically, it occurs when `mincore()` is called with an invalid pointer. The error originates from QEMU's handling of memory access checks in its TCG accelerator. - -**Category:** **syscall** - -This classification is based on the fact that the issue arises during the processing of a system call (`mincore`) and involves checking the validity of memory addresses, which falls under runtime system call handling. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1813398 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1813398 deleted file mode 100644 index 78413831d..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1813398 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,9 +0,0 @@ -The given bug report describes an issue where `qemu` calls `malloc` after a `fork` in a multi-threaded process on a musl-based system. This results in undefined behavior because calling non-async-safe functions like `malloc` after `fork` can corrupt the memory state in the child process. The problem is particularly challenging to reproduce, as it requires specific concurrency between threads. - -The bug involves the use of `malloc` and `free` in a context where the parent process is multi-threaded, leading to potential corruption of the heap in the child after `fork`. This behavior is undefined under POSIX standards, which require that only async-safe functions be called in the child immediately after `fork`. - -Given the context provided, this issue pertains to the runtime environment and how memory management interacts with concurrency and system calls. Therefore, it falls under the category of: - -**runtime** - -The classification is based on the fact that the error occurs during runtime due to improper handling of memory allocation in a multi-threaded process after a `fork` operation. It does not directly involve faulty instructions or specific syscalls beyond the context provided. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1821444 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1821444 deleted file mode 100644 index 9132306b3..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1821444 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,5 +0,0 @@ -The issue involves incorrect float32 arithmetic translation by `qemu-ppc (user)`. This seems to be related to how floating-point operations are emulated within QEMU, potentially involving FPU instruction handling or internal printf emulation. - -**runtime** - -The bug occurs during runtime when the program is executed under QEMU, leading to incorrect results. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1858461 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1858461 deleted file mode 100644 index 834190a1a..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1858461 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,5 +0,0 @@ -The issue described involves adding a new syscall to QEMU for the MIPS architecture but encountering an `ENOSYS` error when the application tries to use it. The user has modified the `linux-user/mips/cpu_loop.c` file by adding a new syscall entry (`MIPS_SYS(sys_getdents64_x32, 3)`) and adjusting the code to handle syscalls beyond a certain number. However, the error persists because the check for valid syscalls is not correctly accounting for the new addition. - -The user also notes that the MIPS `cpu_loop.c` file differs significantly from its ARM counterpart, suggesting that the MIPS implementation may need similar restructuring to properly support extended syscalls as done in the ARM version. - -This issue falls under the category of a **runtime** error because it occurs during the execution of the application when attempting to use the new syscall, leading to an `ENOSYS` ( syscall not supported ) error. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1869241 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1869241 deleted file mode 100644 index d178a7d63..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1869241 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,9 +0,0 @@ -The issue reported involves an error when using `svn checkout` under QEMU emulation for ARM7. The error message indicates that there's a problem reading a directory due to a value being too large for its defined data type. This suggests that somewhere in the process, QEMU is encountering or emulating a system call or instruction that leads to this overflow. - -Considering the categories provided: - -1. **Instruction**: This would involve a specific CPU instruction causing issues. The error here seems more related to how system calls are handled rather than a particular instruction. -2. **Syscall**: Errors with syscalls occur when there's an issue in handling system calls within the emulation. Given that `svn` is interacting with the file system, which involves numerous syscalls, this could be a potential category. -3. **Runtime**: This would cover other runtime errors not directly tied to instructions or syscalls. However, since the error is specifically about handling directory reads and data type sizes, it seems more aligned with how QEMU handles certain operations. - -The most fitting category here is likely **runtime**, as the issue arises during the execution of `svn` within the QEMU environment, involving file system interactions that aren't directly tied to a specific instruction or syscall but rather the overall handling of data types and sizes in the emulation. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1884719 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1884719 deleted file mode 100644 index 78f1cff51..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1884719 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,3 +0,0 @@ -The issue described involves an error where the `io_queue_init` function returns `-38` (ENOSYS) when using the Linux libaio library within a Docker container emulating an aarch64 architecture via QEMU. This suggests that the system call is not implemented in the emulation environment. - -To classify this bug, it falls under the category of **"syscall"** because it involves a problem with a system call (`io_queue_init` likely relies on certain kernel-level operations) not being properly handled or supported in the QEMU user-mode emulation for the foreign architecture. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1906193 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1906193 deleted file mode 100644 index e55247d44..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1906193 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,12 +0,0 @@ -The issue reported involves the fork() system call not returning the expected value when running under QEMU's RISC-V32 user mode emulation. The child process exits with status 42, but the parent receives 40 instead. - -To classify this bug: -1. **Instruction**: This refers to issues with individual CPU instructions. However, the problem here is related to system calls and process management, not specific instructions. -2. **Syscall**: This category involves errors in system calls. The issue arises during the interaction between fork() and wait(), which are syscalls, making this a likely fit. -3. **Runtime**: This covers general runtime errors that don't fall into the other categories. While the error occurs at runtime, it's more specific to syscall handling. - -Given that the problem is centered around system calls (fork and wait) not behaving as expected under QEMU's emulation, the most appropriate category is: - -**syscall** - -The bug report indicates an issue with how QEMU handles these syscalls in the RISC-V32 user mode environment. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2825 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2825 deleted file mode 100644 index 95995e545..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2825 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,5 +0,0 @@ -The issue described involves an error when using `execveat` with a file descriptor and empty filename for cross-architecture processes. This is related to how system calls are handled across different architectures, particularly when using QEMU's binfmt_misc support. - -**Category: syscall** - -The problem arises from the behavior of the `execveat` system call when handling files opened via a file descriptor on cross-architecture binaries. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/449 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/449 deleted file mode 100644 index b1ab40090..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/449 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,5 +0,0 @@ -The bug report describes an assertion failure when running a Go program that uses vector instructions on s390x under QEMU. The issue is traced to specific patches applied to QEMU's master branch. The crash occurs during runtime due to an assertion in the vector instruction handling, which suggests it's related to how instructions are translated or executed. - -**Category: instruction** - -The error arises from faulty instruction translation or execution within QEMU, specifically for s390x vector operations. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/456 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/456 deleted file mode 100644 index 8e5d74b43..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/456 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,8 +0,0 @@ -The issue occurs when running `valheim_server.x86_64` under `qemu-x86_64`, where the process hangs on a `futex` system call, resulting in an "Function not implemented" error. - -Key points: -- The problem is specific to the QEMU emulator. -- It involves the `futex` system call not being implemented in the cross-compiling environment for ARM64 host using Ubuntu 5.2.0 version of QEMU. -- Replicated on an x86_64 Fedora host with a custom-built QEMU master branch. - -This is classified as a **runtime** issue because it occurs during the execution (runtime) when interacting with the `futex` system call, which is not properly handled in the emulator environment. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/714 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/714 deleted file mode 100644 index ed8cdaf4d..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/714 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,7 +0,0 @@ -The issue described relates to command-line arguments not being passed correctly when using QEMU's user-space semihosting feature. This is likely due to how QEMU handles argument passing in this mode, leading to incorrect `argc` and `argv` values. - -The appropriate classification for this bug is: - -**runtime** - -This is because the problem occurs at runtime when the program is executed under QEMU with semihosting enabled, rather than being an issue with a specific instruction or system call. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1072 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1072 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..417f3887d --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1072 @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +The issue described involves differences in behavior when running QEMU directly versus using a remote debugger (GDB). The problem is related to how file descriptors are handled, specifically whether `stdout` is recognized as a character special device (`S_ISCHR`). + +This seems to be related to how the file descriptor for `stdout` is set up differently when debugging. When running under GDB, certain behaviors or setups might differ compared to standalone execution. + +The category of this bug would likely fall under: + +**runtime** + +Since it's an issue that occurs during runtime and relates to file descriptor handling and behavior differences between debugged and non-debugged executions. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1311614 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1311614 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..f2f265b0d --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1311614 @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +The issue involves `qemu-arm` segfaulting when using GCC 4.9.0. The problem arose after upgrading from GCC 4.8.3 to 4.9.0 and was resolved by reverting to the older version. This suggests a compatibility issue between `qemu-arm` and GCC 4.9.0, likely related to how the compiler generates code or interacts with the emulator. + +Given that the segfault occurs during runtime when running commands like `rpm`, it's not an instruction-level fault nor is it directly tied to a syscall error. Instead, it's an issue that arises during the execution of programs compiled with GCC 4.9.0 within the QEMU environment. + +**runtime** + +The problem falls under the "runtime" category because it occurs during the execution of software after compilation, indicating issues in how the emulator handles the code produced by the newer compiler version. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1388 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1388 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..7bec862a4 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1388 @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +The issue reported is about the absence of Windows installers for QEMU 7.2.0 on specific repositories. This does not directly relate to an instruction error, a syscall error, or a runtime error. Instead, it pertains to the availability of distribution files. + +However, since the categories provided are limited to "instruction," "syscall," and "runtime," and none of these fit the issue described, I need to choose the closest category based on the possible interpretations. + +Given that the issue is about missing installers which could be seen as a runtime problem (since it affects the installation process), I will classify it under: + +**runtime** + +This classification assumes that the absence of installers impacts the ability to run QEMU properly, even though it's more about distribution rather than an error during execution. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1416988 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1416988 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c2397bbaa --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1416988 @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +The issue arises because the `siginfo` structure size differs between the Linux kernel and QEMU's implementation. This leads to an incorrect handling of signals when running binaries under QEMU that rely on proper signal information, such as during stack unwinding. + +To fix this, we need to adjust how `SI_PAD_SIZE` is calculated in QEMU's header file to match the Linux kernel's definition. The correct calculation should account for the preamble size and ensure that the structure padding aligns with what the kernel expects. + +Here is the corrected patch: + +```diff +--- a/linux-user/syscall_defs.h ++++ b/linux-user/syscall_defs.h +@@ -103,7 +103,8 @@ enum target_si_code { + #define TARGET_SI_NOINFO (TARGET_SI_MAX_USER) + #endif + +-#define TARGET_SI_PAD_SIZE ((TARGET_SI_MAX_SIZE/sizeof(int)) - 3) ++#define __ARCH_SI_PREAMBLE_SIZE (4 * sizeof(int)) ++#define TARGET_SI_PAD_SIZE ((TARGET_SI_MAX_SIZE - __ARCH_SI_PREAMBLE_SIZE) / sizeof(int)) + + #ifndef TARGET_SI_FDSIZE + #define TARGET_SI_FDSIZE (TARGET_SI_FBITS/SIZEOF_LONG) +``` + +This adjustment ensures that the `siginfo` structure within QEMU aligns with the one used by the Linux kernel, resolving the signal handling issues and preventing segmentation faults or infinite loops during stack unwinding operations. + +After applying this patch, rebuild QEMU to incorporate these changes. + + +The bug report describes an issue related to incorrect signal handling in the QEMU-aarch64 emulator due to a mismatch between the `siginfo` structure sizes used by the Linux kernel and QEMU. Specifically, the size of `struct target_siginfo` in QEMU is larger than that of `struct siginfo` in the kernel, leading to problems such as segmentation faults or infinite loops when running certain applications. + +**Category: runtime** + +The issue occurs during runtime when handling signals, which is why it falls under the "runtime" category. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1462640 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1462640 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a614464ac --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1462640 @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +The bug report describes an issue where `shmat()` fails when running a 32-bit guest program on a 64-bit host using QEMU. The problem arises due to conflicting `mmap` flags—specifically, the initial mapping uses `MAP_PRIVATE`, and `shmat()` attempts to use `MAP_SHARED`, which is not allowed. + +The issue can be classified as a **runtime** error because it occurs during the execution of the program when interacting with shared memory. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1594394 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1594394 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ffb370a0b --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1594394 @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +The issue arises from the use of setreuid() or setegid() functions within user-mode x86_64 code execution under QEMU. These functions are implemented using a signal-based mechanism in NPTL (Native POSIX Threads Library) to invoke syscalls indirectly. Specifically, they utilize a temporary data structure (__xidcmd) and trigger a real-time signal (SIGRT1). However, when running under QEMU, this process causes a segmentation fault because __xidcmd remains uninitialized (null), leading to an invalid memory access during the signal handler execution. + +The classification of this bug is related to how system calls are handled within the user-mode emulation provided by QEMU. The problem occurs at runtime due to improper handling of the internal NPTL mechanisms used for privilege changes, resulting in a crash when attempting to manipulate thread IDs via setreuid() or setegid(). This indicates an issue with how syscalls related to user and group IDs are being processed under certain conditions within the QEMU environment. + +**Answer:** +The bug is classified under **"runtime"** as it pertains to errors occurring during runtime, specifically due to improper handling of system calls related to thread ID changes in a multi-threaded environment under QEMU's emulation. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1716767 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1716767 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..134abca00 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1716767 @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +The issue occurs when using `file(1)` on an SH4 QEMU user emulator with an ELF file, resulting in "Invalid argument". Debugging shows overflown values during processing. This suggests a problem within the QEMU environment rather than with `file` itself. + +**runtime** + +The error happens at runtime within the QEMU emulation context when trying to read the elf file, indicating it's not related to instruction execution or syscalls but an issue in how the emulator handles certain operations. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1776478 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1776478 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..8c96946ee --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1776478 @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +The issue seems to be related to the use of `qemu-arm-static` for cross-compiling LV2 plugins on an ARMv6 architecture (like Raspberry Pi Zero) while the code is intended for ARMv7. The error occurs when running `lv2_ttl_generator`, which is part of DISTRHO-Ports. + +The classification would be **runtime**, as the problem happens during runtime execution within QEMU, specifically related to threading and mutex operations that aren't handled correctly in the cross-compilation environment. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1777226 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1777226 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..51a82e6c4 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1777226 @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +The problem described involves warnings emitted by `qemu-user` that interfere with userland applications' output. The user suggests that these warnings should be directed to a log file instead of stdout/stderr. + +**Category: runtime** + +Reasoning: +- This is an issue related to runtime behavior, specifically how warnings are handled during the execution of QEMU. +- It doesn't pertain to faulty instructions or syscalls but rather to runtime logging and output management. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1813398 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1813398 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..78413831d --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1813398 @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +The given bug report describes an issue where `qemu` calls `malloc` after a `fork` in a multi-threaded process on a musl-based system. This results in undefined behavior because calling non-async-safe functions like `malloc` after `fork` can corrupt the memory state in the child process. The problem is particularly challenging to reproduce, as it requires specific concurrency between threads. + +The bug involves the use of `malloc` and `free` in a context where the parent process is multi-threaded, leading to potential corruption of the heap in the child after `fork`. This behavior is undefined under POSIX standards, which require that only async-safe functions be called in the child immediately after `fork`. + +Given the context provided, this issue pertains to the runtime environment and how memory management interacts with concurrency and system calls. Therefore, it falls under the category of: + +**runtime** + +The classification is based on the fact that the error occurs during runtime due to improper handling of memory allocation in a multi-threaded process after a `fork` operation. It does not directly involve faulty instructions or specific syscalls beyond the context provided. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1821444 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1821444 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..9132306b3 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1821444 @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +The issue involves incorrect float32 arithmetic translation by `qemu-ppc (user)`. This seems to be related to how floating-point operations are emulated within QEMU, potentially involving FPU instruction handling or internal printf emulation. + +**runtime** + +The bug occurs during runtime when the program is executed under QEMU, leading to incorrect results. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1858461 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1858461 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..834190a1a --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1858461 @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +The issue described involves adding a new syscall to QEMU for the MIPS architecture but encountering an `ENOSYS` error when the application tries to use it. The user has modified the `linux-user/mips/cpu_loop.c` file by adding a new syscall entry (`MIPS_SYS(sys_getdents64_x32, 3)`) and adjusting the code to handle syscalls beyond a certain number. However, the error persists because the check for valid syscalls is not correctly accounting for the new addition. + +The user also notes that the MIPS `cpu_loop.c` file differs significantly from its ARM counterpart, suggesting that the MIPS implementation may need similar restructuring to properly support extended syscalls as done in the ARM version. + +This issue falls under the category of a **runtime** error because it occurs during the execution of the application when attempting to use the new syscall, leading to an `ENOSYS` ( syscall not supported ) error. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1869241 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1869241 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d178a7d63 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1869241 @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +The issue reported involves an error when using `svn checkout` under QEMU emulation for ARM7. The error message indicates that there's a problem reading a directory due to a value being too large for its defined data type. This suggests that somewhere in the process, QEMU is encountering or emulating a system call or instruction that leads to this overflow. + +Considering the categories provided: + +1. **Instruction**: This would involve a specific CPU instruction causing issues. The error here seems more related to how system calls are handled rather than a particular instruction. +2. **Syscall**: Errors with syscalls occur when there's an issue in handling system calls within the emulation. Given that `svn` is interacting with the file system, which involves numerous syscalls, this could be a potential category. +3. **Runtime**: This would cover other runtime errors not directly tied to instructions or syscalls. However, since the error is specifically about handling directory reads and data type sizes, it seems more aligned with how QEMU handles certain operations. + +The most fitting category here is likely **runtime**, as the issue arises during the execution of `svn` within the QEMU environment, involving file system interactions that aren't directly tied to a specific instruction or syscall but rather the overall handling of data types and sizes in the emulation. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/456 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/456 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..8e5d74b43 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/456 @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +The issue occurs when running `valheim_server.x86_64` under `qemu-x86_64`, where the process hangs on a `futex` system call, resulting in an "Function not implemented" error. + +Key points: +- The problem is specific to the QEMU emulator. +- It involves the `futex` system call not being implemented in the cross-compiling environment for ARM64 host using Ubuntu 5.2.0 version of QEMU. +- Replicated on an x86_64 Fedora host with a custom-built QEMU master branch. + +This is classified as a **runtime** issue because it occurs during the execution (runtime) when interacting with the `futex` system call, which is not properly handled in the emulator environment. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/714 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/714 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ed8cdaf4d --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/714 @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +The issue described relates to command-line arguments not being passed correctly when using QEMU's user-space semihosting feature. This is likely due to how QEMU handles argument passing in this mode, leading to incorrect `argc` and `argv` values. + +The appropriate classification for this bug is: + +**runtime** + +This is because the problem occurs at runtime when the program is executed under QEMU with semihosting enabled, rather than being an issue with a specific instruction or system call. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1346769 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1346769 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a2215794d --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1346769 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +The issue arises because the QEMU emulator isn't correctly handling the `/proc/self/maps` file for 32-bit guests running under a 64-bit QEMU environment. Specifically, when address sanitizer (Asan) is used in such a setup, it fails to find stack boundaries, leading to an error during initialization. + +Looking at the provided code snippet from `linux-user/syscall.c`, it seems that only certain architectures (like ARM and M68K) have support for writing stack information into `/proc/self/maps`. However, this functionality is missing for other targets like x86_32, which causes Asan to fail when trying to determine the stack boundaries. + +This problem is not isolated; there was a previous report related to system maps not being hidden properly in QEMU. The current issue likely stems from similar root causes, where the handling of process maps isn't consistent across all architectures. + +To classify this bug: + +- **Instruction:** No specific instruction-level issues are mentioned. +- **Syscall:** The problem relates to how `/proc/self/maps` is handled during syscalls, particularly when Asan relies on it for stack information. +- **Runtime:** While the error occurs at runtime, the root cause is more tied to how QEMU implements certain system calls. + +Given that the issue is centered around how QEMU manages the `/proc/self/maps` file and reports stack boundaries (or lack thereof), it falls under the `syscall` category because it involves errors in handling system call-related functionalities specific to process mapping. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1783362 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1783362 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..076ae9ab0 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1783362 @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +The bug report describes an issue where `mmap` returns success (NULL, 0) instead of failure (MAP_FAILED, -1) when len==0 in QEMU-user. This is related to how syscalls are handled in the emulator. + +**syscalls** + +This is a syscall error because it involves incorrect handling of the mmap system call within the QEMU environment. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1785203 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1785203 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b7249fd72 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1785203 @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +The bug report involves an assertion failure related to memory mapping during a system call (`mincore`). Specifically, it occurs when `mincore()` is called with an invalid pointer. The error originates from QEMU's handling of memory access checks in its TCG accelerator. + +**Category:** **syscall** + +This classification is based on the fact that the issue arises during the processing of a system call (`mincore`) and involves checking the validity of memory addresses, which falls under runtime system call handling. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1884719 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1884719 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..78f1cff51 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1884719 @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +The issue described involves an error where the `io_queue_init` function returns `-38` (ENOSYS) when using the Linux libaio library within a Docker container emulating an aarch64 architecture via QEMU. This suggests that the system call is not implemented in the emulation environment. + +To classify this bug, it falls under the category of **"syscall"** because it involves a problem with a system call (`io_queue_init` likely relies on certain kernel-level operations) not being properly handled or supported in the QEMU user-mode emulation for the foreign architecture. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1906193 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1906193 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e55247d44 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1906193 @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +The issue reported involves the fork() system call not returning the expected value when running under QEMU's RISC-V32 user mode emulation. The child process exits with status 42, but the parent receives 40 instead. + +To classify this bug: +1. **Instruction**: This refers to issues with individual CPU instructions. However, the problem here is related to system calls and process management, not specific instructions. +2. **Syscall**: This category involves errors in system calls. The issue arises during the interaction between fork() and wait(), which are syscalls, making this a likely fit. +3. **Runtime**: This covers general runtime errors that don't fall into the other categories. While the error occurs at runtime, it's more specific to syscall handling. + +Given that the problem is centered around system calls (fork and wait) not behaving as expected under QEMU's emulation, the most appropriate category is: + +**syscall** + +The bug report indicates an issue with how QEMU handles these syscalls in the RISC-V32 user mode environment. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2825 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2825 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..95995e545 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2825 @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +The issue described involves an error when using `execveat` with a file descriptor and empty filename for cross-architecture processes. This is related to how system calls are handled across different architectures, particularly when using QEMU's binfmt_misc support. + +**Category: syscall** + +The problem arises from the behavior of the `execveat` system call when handling files opened via a file descriptor on cross-architecture binaries. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/analysis.csv b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/analysis.csv new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ab7a1215a --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/analysis.csv @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +category, count +instruction, 107 +runtime, 5 +syscall, 7 diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/categories.csv b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/categories.csv new file mode 100644 index 000000000..2f66e87ea --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/categories.csv @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +category, count +instruction, 396 +runtime, 70 +syscall, 85 diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1010484 b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1010484 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..8d53d108b --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1010484 @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +instruction: 0.590 +syscall: 0.222 +runtime: 0.189 + + + +slirp to accept non-local dns server + +current version of slirp doesn't allow feeded dns address to be outside of given network. +in many scenarios you need to provide dns server that isn't local. + +this simple patch removes checking for if dns server isn't in local subnet. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1027 b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1027 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..3d1224f0d --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1027 @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +instruction: 0.689 +runtime: 0.201 +syscall: 0.109 + + + +Executables should have embedded plist on macOS +Description of problem: +QEMU binaries on macOS should have an embedded property list (`plist`). + +The bundle identifier of an application, as well as many other settings, are usually not set programmatically but through an `Info.plist` file found within the application bundle (`.app`) which is a property list (basically a settings file in XML format). + +When liking a command line binary, you can tell the linker to embed such a property list inside the binary and the system will respect that when loading the binary. Having an embedded `Info.plist` is highly recommended for all macOS applications, even command line tools, as many system features will not work correctly (or are not even possible) unless they have one (not in all places the binary name will work instead of a bundle identifier). + +All you need to do is writing a [plist file by hand](https://docs.transifex.com/formats/apple-plist) (for a list of available keys, see [Apple's documentation](https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/General/Reference/InfoPlistKeyReference/Introduction/Introduction.html)) and then tell the liker to embed it into the binary: + +``` +-sectcreate __TEXT __info_plist YourPlistFile.plist +``` + +This makes it far easier to set app specific settings correctly, as in #334 for example. Also things like sudden termination can be disabled completely that way without a single line of code. diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1028 b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1028 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e81773174 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1028 @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@ +instruction: 0.438 +runtime: 0.332 +syscall: 0.230 + + + +Assert fail for RISC-V RVV vmv.v.x for e64, vl == vl_max on RV32 guest +Description of problem: +assert message: +qemu/tcg/tcg-op-gvec.c:1714: tcg_gen_gvec_dup_i32: Assertion `vece <= MO_32' failed. + +For a e64 vmv.v.x, in the file trans_rvv.c.inc, function "trans_vmv_v_x", when s->vl_eq_vlmax is true, then "tcg_gen_gvec_dup_tl" (it's defined to tcg_gen_gvec_dup_i32 for RV32) is called. In "tcg_gen_gvec_dup_i32" the assert "tcg_debug_assert(vece <= MO_32) will be triggered, since vece == MO_64 for e64. +Steps to reproduce: +1.enable cfg.Zve64f + +2.Prepare a problem as set e64, vl == vl_max and use vmv.v.x, maybe as below +``` + li t0, -1, + vsetvli x0, t0, e64,m1,tu,mu + li t1, -1 + vmv.v.x v0, t1 +``` +Additional information: +Below is a possible solution if it's appropriate. +``` +#if TARGET_LONG_BITS == 32 + if (s->sew == 3) { + TCGv_i64 s1_i64 = tcg_temp_new_i64(); + tcg_gen_ext_tl_i64(s1_i64, s1); + tcg_gen_gvec_dup_i64(s->sew, vreg_ofs(s, a->rd), + MAXSZ(s), MAXSZ(s), s1_i64); + tcg_temp_free_i64(s1_i64); + } else { +#endif + tcg_gen_gvec_dup_tl(s->sew, vreg_ofs(s, a->rd), + MAXSZ(s), MAXSZ(s), s1); +#if TARGET_LONG_BITS == 32 + } +#endif +``` diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1031920 b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1031920 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..7ecf8c33d --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1031920 @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +instruction: 0.593 +runtime: 0.266 +syscall: 0.141 + + + +Linux user gdbserver does not respond to remote `Ctrl-C' interrupts + +The bug was reproduce in a recent mainline build for ARM Linux by starting emulation with a gdbserver: + +$ qemu-arm -g 1234 a.out + +and then connecting from gdb: + +(gdb) target remote :1234 +Remote debugging using :1234 +[New Remote target] +[Switching to Remote target] +0x00008ba8 in _start () +(gdb) b main +Breakpoint 1 at 0x8cb0: file hello.c, line 5. +(gdb) cont +Continuing. + +Breakpoint 1, main (argc=1, argv=0xf6fff24c) at hello.c:5 +5 int n = 0; +(gdb) l +1 #include +2 +3 int main (int argc, char **argv) +4 { +5 int n = 0; +6 +7 for (;;) { +8 printf ("Hello, World!\n"); +9 sleep (5); +10 } +(gdb) cont +Continuing. +^C^CInterrupted while waiting for the program. +Give up (and stop debugging it)? (y or n) y + +Notice that the `Ctrl-C' interrupts are ignored. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1034 b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1034 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..aedc23caa --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1034 @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +instruction: 0.672 +runtime: 0.209 +syscall: 0.119 + + + +Erlang/OTP 25 JIT on AArch64 fails in user mode emulation +Description of problem: +Compiling Erlang/OTP 25 fails with segfault when using user mode (but works in system mode), the Erlang devs have tracked it down in [ErlangForums](https://erlangforums.com/t/otp-25-0-rc3-release-candidate-3-is-released/1317/24) and give this explanation: + +> Thanks, I’ve found a bug in QEMU that explains this. The gist of it is: +> +> Instead of interpreting guest code, QEMU dynamically translates it to the host architecture. When the guest overwrites code for one reason or another, the translation is invalidated and redone if needed. +> +> Our JIT:ed code is mapped in two regions to work in the face of W^X restrictions: one executable but not writable, and one writable but not executable. Both of these regions point to the same physical memory and writes to the writable region are “magically” reflected in the executable one. +> +> I would’ve expected QEMU to honor the IC IVAU / ISB instructions we use to tell the processor that we’ve altered code at a particular address, but for some reason QEMU just ignores them 3 and relies entirely on trapping writes to previously translated code. +> +> In system mode QEMU emulates the MMU and sees that these two regions point at the same memory, and has no problem invalidating the executable region after writing to the writable region. +> +> In user mode it instead calls mprotect(..., PROT_READ) on all code regions it has translated, and invalidates translations in the signal handler. The problem is that we never write to the executable region – just the writable one – so the code doesn’t get invalidated. + +There doesn't seem to a open or closed QEMU bug that actually describes this problem. diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1041 b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1041 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..80581b7c8 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1041 @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +instruction: 0.609 +runtime: 0.268 +syscall: 0.123 + + + +x86_64 Auxillary vector reports platform as i686 which doesn't match the linux kernel +Description of problem: +Based on the kernel source in the auxiliary vector AT_PLATFORM should be `x86_64` (confirmed by running outside qemu). However qemu sets it to `i686`. + +This was originally reported with docker-for-mac, but was reduced on `x86_64` which is why it is pointless +Steps to reproduce: +1. Compile the following for x86_64 (statically if you don't want have an x86_64 dynamic linker) (code originally from https://stackoverflow.com/questions/26520163/accessing-auxiliary-vectors-c) + +``` +#include +#include + +int main(int argc, char** argv, char* envp[]) { + Elf64_auxv_t *auxv; + while(*envp++ != NULL); + + /*from stack diagram above: *envp = NULL marks end of envp*/ + int i = 0 ; + for (auxv = (Elf64_auxv_t *)envp; auxv->a_type != AT_NULL; auxv++) + /* auxv->a_type = AT_NULL marks the end of auxv */ + { + if( auxv->a_type == AT_PLATFORM) + printf("AT_PLATFORM is: %s\n", ((char*)auxv->a_un.a_val)); + } +} +``` +2. Run with `qemu-x86_64-static` +3. See `AT_PLATFORM is: i686` +4. Compare to "real" x86_64 bit system which gives `AT_PLATFORM is: x86_64` +Additional information: +I think that adding `#define ELF_PLATFORM "x86_64"` [here](https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/blob/master/linux-user/elfload.c#L134) should work (but I don't fully understand the code). Otherwise we just end up getting the 32-bit case. diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1052857 b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1052857 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ba47af0d8 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1052857 @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +instruction: 0.613 +syscall: 0.197 +runtime: 0.190 + + + +qemu-user compiled static for ppc fails on 64bit hosts + +On debian I used debootstrap to set up a powerpc chroot. If I then copy in a statically linked qemu-user ppc binary it will work for some commands in the chroot and fail for others. Steps to reproduce: + +host$ mkdir powerpc +host$ sudo debootstrap --arch=powerpc --foreign wheezy powerpc http://ftp.debian.org/debian +host$ sudo cp /usr/bin/qemu-ppc-static powerpc/usr/bin/ +host$ LANG=C sudo chroot powerpc /usr/bin/qemu-ppc-static /bin/bash +I have no name!@guest:/# pwd +/ +I have no name!@guest:/# cd home/ +I have no name!@guest:/home# ls +qemu-ppc-static: /tmp/buildd/qemu-1.1.2+dfsg/linux-user/signal.c:4341: setup_frame: Assertion `({ unsigned long __guest = (unsigned long)(ka->_sa_handler) - guest_base; (__guest < (1ul << 32)) && (!reserved_va || (__guest < reserved_va)); })' failed. + +I have also built this from the git HEAD sources (hash 6b80f7db8a7f84d21e46d01e30c8497733bb23a0) and I get the same result. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1054812 b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1054812 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..cf9d4a41c --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1054812 @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +instruction: 0.601 +syscall: 0.243 +runtime: 0.156 + + + +Configure uses wrong libtool on Darwin + +On Darwin/OS X, there are two versions of libtool: the GNU libtool, and Apple's libtool. Both are installed, but Apple's libtool (libtool) won't build libcacard that Qemu uses, but Gnu's libtool (glibtool) does. I get around using Apple's libtool by passing LIBTOOL=glibtool when configuring; unfortunately this variable isn't preserved so when Qemu's configure changes it's not passed. A simple switch in the configure script could check for Darwin, then if present, use glibtool. Or configure could check the features of libtool, see if they can build libcacard, then look for alternatives like glibtool. + +This bug was probably introduced when libcacard was added to Qemu, and is present in commit 93b6599734f81328ee3d608f57667742cafeea72. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1054831 b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1054831 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d58833e79 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1054831 @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +instruction: 0.546 +syscall: 0.299 +runtime: 0.155 + + + +qemu-user-static for sparc32plus : bash: fork: Invalid argument + +On Debian x86-64 host system I setup a sparc chroot using: + +host $ mkdir sparc +host $ sudo debootstrap --arch=sparc --foreign wheezy sparc http://ftp.au.debian.org/debian +host $ sudo cp ~/Git/qemu/sparc32plus-linux-user/qemu-sparc32plus sparc/usr/bin/qemu-sparc32plus-static +host $ LANG=C sudo chroot sparc/ /usr/bin/qemu-sparc32plus-static /bin/bash + +When I then run the second stage of debootstrap I get: + +target $ /debootstrap/debootstrap --second-stage +bash: fork: Invalid argument + +The above procedures works perfectly for armhf. + +This is with current git HEAD (commit 93b6599734f81328ee3d608f57667742cafeea72). \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1059 b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1059 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..98147c627 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1059 @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +instruction: 0.656 +syscall: 0.184 +runtime: 0.160 + + + +qemu: uncaught target signal 6 (Aborted) - core dumped Issue +Description of problem: +When we are trying to use the docker images which is using Qemu internally in mac Os then we are getting the qemu: uncaught target signal 6 (Aborted) - core dumped Issue +Steps to reproduce: +1. https://botfront.io/docs/installation/local-machine install in local machine +2. run bot front run +3. Go to the docker dashboard and open the botfront-rasa. +4. ![Screenshot_2022-06-03_at_12.34.54_PM](/uploads/db4f0ba030cac850e1ae90189d1f8a55/Screenshot_2022-06-03_at_12.34.54_PM.png) +Additional information: +Looking forward to get some updates regarding how we can solve this or any hack we can apply here. Thanks in advance. diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1066909 b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1066909 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e3360c221 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1066909 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +instruction: 0.406 +syscall: 0.406 +runtime: 0.187 + + + +App-level clone emulation for microblaze is broken + +When CLONE_THREAD is used, the new process starts with the program counter pointing to the system call instruction, rather than the instruction immediately following it. This causes an infinite cascade (linear growth, not exponential) of thread creation, which quickly crashes when the threads start running and they're all using the same stack. + +I'm using qemu 1.1.2 packaged with Debian, but I'm not aware of any fixes since then that would address the problem. + +I can provide a test program if needed; a short C program using syscall() directly or an even-shorter asm program can demonstrate the issue without need for debugging around pthread library routines. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1068900 b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1068900 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..83813f7a3 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1068900 @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +instruction: 0.517 +runtime: 0.364 +syscall: 0.119 + + + +Thread cancellation broken in app-level emulation + +Thread cancellation (and certain other implementation-internal things such as set*id() and timers) are implemented in userspace on Linux by stealing a couple of the realtime signals for internal use by the implementation, leaving them unavailable to applications. Unfortunately, this bites qemu application-level emulation when the application being run uses thread cancellation or other features that need such signals. The signal handler is unable to be set (because sigaction on the host rejects the signal numbers) and attempts to send the signals result in it being received not by the emulated application code, but by the libc/libpthread code on which qemu is running; this in turn seems to cause qemu to crash. + +The best solution I can think of is for qemu to steal one of the realtime signals for its own use, and multiplex signal numbers outside the range SIGRTMIN..SIGRTMAX, as well as the stolen signal itself, on top of this stolen signal. This would both allow cancellation to work, and would allow applications the full range of realtime signals when the guest has more signals than the host (e.g. MIPS running on x86 host). \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1070 b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1070 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b4470b37c --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1070 @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +instruction: 0.512 +syscall: 0.254 +runtime: 0.234 + + + +gdbstub XML generation for ARM is done for every CPU +Description of problem: +- As arm_cpu_register_gdb_regs_for_features is called from the device + realize stage for each vCPU in user mode we end up uselessly + regenerating the XML for every new thread. Once you get up to 100 + threads this starts exceeding the large maps done for QHT and PageDesc +Steps to reproduce: +See above command line, valgrind picks it up +Additional information: +See also #866, #967 diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1072 b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1072 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..5540f4e6b --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1072 @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +instruction: 0.458 +runtime: 0.360 +syscall: 0.182 + + + +different behavior when remote debugger is used +Description of problem: +I found Qemu shows different behavior when I run Qemu with hello-world (statically linked binary enclosed) directly or run it through remote debugger. I need help to understand the following: + +1. Is this intended behavior? +1. Any way to make the two approaches have consistent behavior (I prefer the behavior shown in the 2nd approach described below) +1. If it is intended behavior, any explanation why or suggestions how to dig further to root cause the difference. + +The corresponding source code is the line 86 in [filedoalloc.c](https://code.woboq.org/userspace/glibc/libio/filedoalloc.c.html#86). It tests if the file (stdout) is char special device (S_ISCHR) +The preprocessed code is as follows: + if (((((st.st_mode)) & 0170000) == (0020000))) + +I then compared two different approaches to run Qemu: + +1. I used the following command line to collect the trace: qemu_aarch64 -strace -plugin $QEMU_ROOT/build/contrib/plugins/libexeclog.so -d plugin hello.a64. This one tests False for S_ISCHR +1. when I used gdb to connect to Qemu and single-step the instructions, S_ISCHR tests True, which is different from running qemu directly (approach 1). + +Thanks! +Steps to reproduce: +1.[hello.a64](/uploads/4b4ccae8c1e4b045c39ceae6a094d55a/hello.a64) +2. +3. +Additional information: + diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1075 b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1075 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..bcb6e4163 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1075 @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ +instruction: 0.501 +syscall: 0.377 +runtime: 0.122 + + + +Unable to create a cluster using ppc64le specific kind binary on x86 host architecture +Description of problem: + +Steps to reproduce: +1. docker run --rm --privileged multiarch/qemu-user-static --reset -p yes +2. wget https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kind/releases/download/v0.14.0/kind-linux-ppc64le +3. chmod u+x kind-linux-ppc64le +4. curl -LO https://storage.googleapis.com/kubernetes-release/release/$(curl -s https://storage.googleapis.com/kubernetes-release/release/stable.txt)/bin/linux/ppc64le/kubectl +5. chmod +x kubectl +6. sudo cp kubectl /usr/local/bin/ +7. KUBECONFIG="${HOME}/kind-test-config" +8. export KUBECONFIG +9. ./kind-linux-ppc64le create cluster --image quay.io/mayurwaghmode111/node-ppc64le:ppc64le -v=3 --wait 1m --retain +10. ./kind-linux-ppc64le export logs +Additional information: + diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1075339 b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1075339 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..1cb7de29e --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1075339 @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +instruction: 0.595 +runtime: 0.299 +syscall: 0.105 + + + +linux-user emulation of setsockopt ignores optlen + +setsockopt always treats the argument as a 4-byte int. This breaks timeout options (for which it's an 8- or 16-byte timeval structure, depending on word size) and possibly other socket options. int is probably a safe default, but options whose values are other types need special-case conversion code. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1076445 b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1076445 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..cef49fc3d --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1076445 @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ +instruction: 0.473 +runtime: 0.285 +syscall: 0.242 + + + +qemu-i386 fails on system(3) with a cross-toolchain from Buildroot + +qemu-i386 fails with small C program containing a system(). +The C program is cross-compiled with a toolchain created by buildroot (http://buildroot.net/), gcc version 4.6.3, uClibc version 0.9.33.2 . +qemu version 1.2.0 (built with http://git.buildroot.net/buildroot/tree/package/qemu/qemu.mk) +host machine : Ubuntu 12.04 LTS on x86_64. + + $ cat sys.c + #include + #include + + int main() + { + int ret = system("echo hello"); + printf("%d\n", ret); + } + + $ ../../host/usr/bin/i686-buildroot-linux-uclibc-gcc -o sys sys.c + $ file sys + sys: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped + $ ../../host/usr/bin/qemu-i386 ./sys + -1 + +same problem with x86_64 : + $ ../../host/usr/bin/x86_64-buildroot-linux-uclibc-gcc -o sys sys.c + $ file sys + sys: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped + $ ../../host/usr/bin/qemu-x86_64 sys + -1 + +works fine with arm : + $ ../../host/usr/bin/arm-buildroot-linux-uclibcgnueabi-gcc -o sys sys.c + $ file sys + sys: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, ARM, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped + $ ../../host/usr/bin/qemu-arm ./sys + hello + 0 + +works fine with mips : + $ ../../host/usr/bin/mips-buildroot-linux-uclibc-gcc -o sys sys.c + $ file sys + sys: ELF 32-bit MSB executable, MIPS, MIPS32 rel2 version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), with unknown capability 0x41000000 = 0xf676e75, with unknown capability 0x10000 = 0x70403, not stripped + $ ../../host/usr/bin/qemu-mips sys + hello + 0 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1079080 b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1079080 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..486afa7af --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1079080 @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +instruction: 0.848 +runtime: 0.112 +syscall: 0.040 + + +ARM instruction "srs" wrong behaviour + +Quote from ARM Architecture Reference Manual ARMv7-A and ARMv7-R : +"Store Return State stores the LR and SPSR of the current mode to the stack of a specified mode" + +Problem: +When executing this instruction, the register stored is CPSR instead of SPSR. + +Context: +Using QEMU 1.2.0 to simulate a Zynq application (processor Cortex-a9 mpcore) with the following command line: +qemu-system-arm -M xilinx-zynq-a9 -m 512 -serial null -serial mon:stdio -dtb /home/vcesson/workspace/xilinx_zynq.dtb -kernel install/tests/io/serial/current/tests/serial2 -S -s -nographic \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1092 b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1092 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..9183533bb --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1092 @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ +instruction: 0.942 +runtime: 0.039 +syscall: 0.019 + + + +PPC: `sraw` instructions does not set `ca` and `ca32` flags. +Description of problem: +The translation of Power PC instruction `sraw` and `sraw.` don't set the `ca` or `ca32` flags although, according to +[PowerISA 3.1b](https://files.openpower.foundation/s/dAYSdGzTfW4j2r2) (page 140), they should. +Additional information: +This gets particular apparent if compared to `srawi` (which does set `ca`, `ca32`). + +**sraw** + +https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/blob/master/target/ppc/translate.c#L2914 + +**srawi** + +https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/blob/master/target/ppc/translate.c#L2924 diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1093 b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1093 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..bb569fb8f --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1093 @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +instruction: 0.604 +syscall: 0.242 +runtime: 0.154 + + + +RISC-V: signal frame is misaligned in signal handlers +Description of problem: +`qemu-user` misaligns the signal frame (to 4 bytes rather than 16 bytes) on RISC-V 64, e.g causing pointer misalignment diagnostics to be triggered by UBSan. +Steps to reproduce: +1. Create a C file with the following contents: +```c +#include +#include + +void handler(int sig, siginfo_t *info, void *context) { + printf("signal occurred, info: %p, context: %p\n", info, context); +} + +int main() { + struct sigaction act; + act.sa_flags = SA_SIGINFO; + act.sa_sigaction = handler; + sigaction(SIGINT, &act, NULL); + + // Deliberately misalign the stack + asm volatile ("addi sp, sp, -4"); + + while(1); + // Unreachable +} +``` +2. Compile with an appropriate RISC-V toolchain and run with `qemu-riscv64 ./a.out`. +3. Send a `SIGINT` (e.g by hitting Ctrl-C), and observe that the signal frame will be misaligned: +``` +signal occurred, info: 0x400080025c, context: 0x40008002dc +``` +Additional information: +This issue is alluded to in the source code, see https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/blob/master/linux-user/riscv/signal.c#L68-69. It should be sufficient to change that constant to 15. diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1095531 b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1095531 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..dcc511cdf --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1095531 @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ +instruction: 0.445 +syscall: 0.314 +runtime: 0.241 + + + +sparc32plus (and others?) has x86 code generation errors on 64bit hosts + +On 64bit hosts, the load and store functions compile improperly. The issue is the call to gen_address_mask() under the ld and st functions in target-sparc/translate.c. Below are some snips from the log file. Doing a gdb debug, this results in constant access violation errors which I do not see when debugging qemu in powerpc mode. + +-------------- +IN: +0x0000000040804aa8: st %i0, [ %fp + 0x44 ] + +OP: + ---- 0x40804aa8 + ld_i64 tmp1,regwptr,$0xb0 + mov_i64 tmp0,tmp1 + movi_i64 tmp2,$0x44 + add_i64 tmp0,tmp0,tmp2 + ld_i64 tmp2,regwptr,$0x80 + ext32u_i64 tmp0,tmp0 + qemu_st32 tmp2,tmp0,$0x0 + +OUT: [size=345] +0x6032d7f0: mov 0x40(%r14),%rbp +0x6032d7f4: mov 0xb0(%rbp),%rbx +0x6032d7fb: add $0x44,%rbx +0x6032d7ff: mov 0x80(%rbp),%rbp +0x6032d806: mov %ebx,%ebx <- bug +0x6032d808: mov %ebp,%edi +0x6032d80a: bswap %edi +0x6032d80c: mov %edi,(%rbx) + +-------------- +IN: +0x0000000040804aec: add %l7, %o7, %l7 +0x0000000040804af0: ld [ %l7 ], %g2 + +OP: + ---- 0x40804aec + ld_i64 tmp1,regwptr,$0x78 + ld_i64 tmp2,regwptr,$0x38 + add_i64 tmp0,tmp1,tmp2 + st_i64 tmp0,regwptr,$0x78 + + ---- 0x40804af0 + ld_i64 tmp1,regwptr,$0x78 + mov_i64 tmp0,tmp1 + ext32u_i64 tmp0,tmp0 + qemu_ld32u g2,tmp0,$0x0 + +OUT: [size=395] +0x6032da80: mov 0x40(%r14),%rbp +0x6032da84: mov 0x78(%rbp),%rbx +0x6032da88: mov 0x38(%rbp),%r12 +0x6032da8c: add %r12,%rbx +0x6032da8f: mov %rbx,0x78(%rbp) +0x6032da93: mov 0x78(%rbp),%rbx +0x6032da97: mov %ebx,%ebx <- bug +0x6032da99: mov (%rbx),%ebx + +In 64bit mode, doing a 32bit operation will result in the top 32bit's being zero'd. I attempted to simply disable the call to gen_address_mask() but that did not fix the issue and actually caused the sparc32plus I was testing to become unusable. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1095857 b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1095857 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d261dbdb6 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1095857 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +instruction: 0.970 +runtime: 0.018 +syscall: 0.012 + + + +incorrect handling of [r32] address (long mode) + +while executing in Long Mode (x86-64) instructions such as + +mov eax,[r15d] + +end up executing as + +mov eax,[r15] + +according to x86 programmer manuals the behavior of using the Address-Size override (in long mode) is supposed to ignore the high 32bits of the register. I use this fact in my operating system to reduce register usage (the high 32 bits of r15 holds other data). consequently a general protection exception occurs since the memory address isn't "canonical". this error doesn't always appear since the high 32 bits might not be zero in those conditions. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1098729 b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1098729 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..7807819ad --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1098729 @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +instruction: 0.598 +runtime: 0.226 +syscall: 0.176 + + + +qemu-user-static for armhf: segfault in threaded code + + +Currently running QEMU from git (fedf2de31023) and running the armhf version of qemu-user-static which I have renamed qemu-armhf-static to follow the naming convention used in Debian. + +The host systems is a Debian testing x86_64-linux and I have an Debian testing armhf chroot which I invoke using schroot. + +Majority of program in the armhf chroot run fine, but I'm getting qemu segfaults in multi-threaded programs. + +As an example, I've grabbed the threads demo program here: + + https://computing.llnl.gov/tutorials/pthreads/samples/dotprod_mutex.c + +and changed NUMTHRDS from 4 to 10. I compile it as (same compile command on both x86_64 host and armhf guest): + + gcc -Wall -lpthread dotprod_mutex.c -o dotprod_mutex + +When compiled for x86_64 host it runs perfectly and even under Valgrind displays no errors whatsoever. + +However, when I compile the program in my armhs chroot and run it it usually (but not always) segaults or hangs or crashes. Example output: + + + (armhf) $ ./dotprod_mutex + Thread 1 did 100000 to 200000: mysum=100000.000000 global sum=100000.000000 + Thread 0 did 0 to 100000: mysum=100000.000000 global sum=200000.000000 + TCG temporary leak before f6731ca0 + qemu-arm-static: /home/erikd/Git/qemu-posix-timer-hacking/Upstream/tcg/tcg-op.h:2371: + tcg_gen_goto_tb: Assertion `(tcg_ctx.goto_tb_issue_mask & (1 << idx)) == 0' failed. + + + (armhf) $ ./dotprod_mutex + qemu: uncaught target signal 11 (Segmentation fault) - core dumped + Segmentation fault + + (armhf) $ ./dotprod_mutex + qemu-arm-static: /home/erikd/Git/qemu-posix-timer-hacking/Upstream/tcg/tcg.c:519: + tcg_temp_free_internal: Assertion `idx >= s->nb_globals && idx < s->nb_temps' failed. + + + (armhf) $ ./dotprod_mutex + Thread 1 did 100000 to 200000: mysum=100000.000000 global sum=100000.000000 + qemu: uncaught target signal 11 (Segmentation fault) - core dumped + Segmentation fault \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1128 b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1128 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..60212a6ae --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1128 @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +instruction: 0.608 +runtime: 0.223 +syscall: 0.169 + + + +PPC: `spr_write_xer` doesn't set flag bits in `cpu_xer` +Description of problem: +`spr_write_xer()` does not set the `ca`, `ov`, `so`, `ca32`, `ov32` etc. flag bits in the `cpu_xer` variable. + +In fact it copies all bits from the source `GPR` and _excludes_ each flag bit. + +This is not a problem for execution since `spr_read_xer()` gets the flag bits from `cpu_ca/ov/so...` and not from `cpu_xer`. + +Nonetheless it is problem for tools which trace the execution in QEMU (e.g. https://github.com/BinaryAnalysisPlatform/qemu). + +A fix would be to remove the `~` in https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/blob/master/target/ppc/translate.c#L481 +Steps to reproduce: +Haven't found out yet how to debug QEMU so the TCGv values can be investigated. But in general one need to: + +- Execute a binary which executes something like: +``` +r4 = 0xffffffffffffffff +mtxer r4 +``` +and check the `cpu_xer` value after the `xer` write. + +Checking the debug logs (`in_asm,cpu`) doesn't work, since the `xer` value in the logs is not taken directly from `cpu_xer`. +Additional information: +Code ref: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/blob/master/target/ppc/translate.c#L480-L483 diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1129571 b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1129571 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..34d70dbe1 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1129571 @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ +instruction: 0.715 +runtime: 0.174 +syscall: 0.111 + + + +libreoffice armhf FTBFS + +We have been experiencing FTBFS of LibreOffice 3.5.7, 12.04, armhf in the launchpad buildds. We believe this is likely due to an error in qemu. + +While we do not have a small test case yet, we do have a build log (attaching here). + +The relevant snippet from the build log is: + +3.5.7/solver/unxlngr.pro/bin/jaxp.jar:/build/buildd/libreoffice-3.5.7/solver/unxlngr.pro/bin/juh.jar:/build/buildd/libreoffice-3.5.7/solver/unxlngr.pro/bin/parser.jar:/build/buildd/libreoffice-3.5.7/solver/unxlngr.pro/bin/xt.jar:/build/buildd/libreoffice-3.5.7/solver/unxlngr.pro/bin/unoil.jar:/build/buildd/libreoffice-3.5.7/solver/unxlngr.pro/bin/ridl.jar:/build/buildd/libreoffice-3.5.7/solver/unxlngr.pro/bin/jurt.jar:/build/buildd/libreoffice-3.5.7/solver/unxlngr.pro/bin/xmlsearch.jar:/build/buildd/libreoffice-3.5.7/solver/unxlngr.pro/bin/LuceneHelpWrapper.jar:/build/buildd/libreoffice-3.5.7/solver/unxlngr.pro/bin/HelpIndexerTool.jar:/build/buildd/libreoffice-3.5.7/solver/unxlngr.pro/bin/lucene-core-2.3.jar:/build/buildd/libreoffice-3.5.7/solver/unxlngr.pro/bin/lucene-analyzers-2.3.jar" com.sun.star.help.HelpIndexerTool -lang cs -mod swriter -zipdir ../../unxlngr.pro/misc/ziptmpswriter_cs -o ../../unxlngr.pro/bin/swriter_cs.zip.unxlngr.pro +dmake: Error code 132, while making '../../unxlngr.pro/bin/swriter_cs.zip' + +We believe this is from bash error code 128 + 4, where 4 is illegal instruction, thus leading us to suspect qemu. + +Any help in tracking this down would be appreciated. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1147 b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1147 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..07f7e2a86 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1147 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +instruction: 0.697 +runtime: 0.214 +syscall: 0.089 + + + +x86_64 emu on aarch64 host: cpu_exec: assertion failed: (cpu == current_cpu) +Description of problem: +Execution of some binaries crashes with `Bail out! ERROR:../qemu-7.0.0/accel/tcg/cpu-exec.c:933:cpu_exec: assertion failed: (cpu == current_cpu)`. Looking at the code, that code is wrapped in a gcc/clang ifdef. Recompiling with clang produces this crash instead: `... include/qemu/rcu.h:102: void rcu_read_unlock(void): Assertion 'p_rcu_reader->depth != 0' failed.` + +No easier steps to reproduce (yet) than `systemd-nspawn`ing into an x86_64 Ubuntu container invoking qemu-x86_64-static through binfmt. Commands such as `ls` work fine, while `apt-get` will immediately crash with the error listed above. + +Note that this happens running Asahi Linux on the bare metal of an M1-based Macbook Pro. This same issue does *not* occur running the *same* binaries with the *same* x86_64 Ubuntu image on an Arch or Ubuntu VM under macOS on the same machine - regardless of if the QEMU binaries were built in a VM or in Asahi. + +These are big.LITTLE chips. Using taskset/affinity to limit the target process to a single specific core does not help. The Asahi kernel has a 16K page-size, which is known to cause trouble for some programs. qemu-arm(-static) however works without any issues (the M1 cannot run 32-bit ARM code natively, only 64-bit). diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1156 b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1156 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..cdd76107e --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1156 @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +instruction: 0.852 +runtime: 0.096 +syscall: 0.052 + + + +Incorrect implementation of vmsumudm instruction diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1156313 b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1156313 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..095f87a9a --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/1156313 @@ -0,0 +1,132 @@ +instruction: 0.397 +runtime: 0.351 +syscall: 0.252 + +semantic: 0.869 +mistranslation: 0.841 +assembly: 0.789 +device: 0.777 +instruction: 0.707 +other: 0.705 +vnc: 0.702 +graphic: 0.657 +socket: 0.605 +boot: 0.576 +network: 0.533 +KVM: 0.518 + +X86-64 flags handling broken + +The current qemu sources cause improper handling of flags on x86-64. +This bug seems to have shown up a few weeks ago. + +A plain install of Debian GNU/Linux makes user processes catch +spurious signals. The kernel seems to run stably, though. + +The ADX feature works very poorly. It might be related; at least it +allows for reproducibly provoking invalid behaviour. + +Here is a test case: + +================================================================ +qemumain.c +#include +long adx(); +int +main () +{ + printf ("%lx\n", adx (0xffbeef, 17)); + return 0; +} +================================================================ +qemuadx.s: + .globl adx +adx: xor %rax, %rax +1: dec %rdi + jnz 1b + .byte 0xf3, 0x48, 0x0f, 0x38, 0xf6, 0xc0 # adox %rax, %rax + .byte 0x66, 0x48, 0x0f, 0x38, 0xf6, 0xc0 # adcx %rax, %rax + ret +================================================================ + +Compile and execute: +$ gcc -m64 qemumain.c qemuadx.s +$ a.out +ffffff8000378cd8 + +Expected output is simply "0". The garbage value varies between qemu +compiles and guest systems. + +Note that one needs a recent GNU assembler in order to handle adox and +adcx. For convenience I have supplied them as byte sequences. + +Exaplanation and feeble analysis: + +The 0xffbeef argument is a loop count. It is necessary to loop for a +while in order to trigger this bug. If the loop count is decreased, +the bug will seen intermittently; the lower the count, the less +frequent the invalid behaviour. + +It seems like a reasonable assumption that this bug is related to +flags handling at context switch. Presumably, qemu keeps flags state +in some internal format, then recomputes then when needing to form the +eflags register, as needed for example for context switching. + +I haven't tried to reproduce this bug using qemu-x86_64 and SYSROOT, +but I strongly suspect that to be impossible. I use +qemu-system-x86_64 and the guest Debian GNU/Linux x86_64 (version +6.0.6) . + +The bug happens also with the guest FreeBSD x86_64 version 9.1. (The +iteration count for triggering the problem 50% of the runs is not the +same when using the kernel Linux and FreeBSD's kernel, presumably due +to different ticks.) + +The bug happens much more frequently for a loaded system; in fact, the +loop count can be radically decreased if two instances of the trigger +program are run in parallel. + +Richard Henderson