1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
|
performance: 0.952
debug: 0.943
other: 0.943
permissions: 0.939
graphic: 0.933
semantic: 0.920
PID: 0.916
device: 0.915
socket: 0.912
files: 0.904
vnc: 0.885
boot: 0.880
KVM: 0.840
network: 0.830
[Qemu-devel] [BUG] Windows 7 got stuck easily while run PCMark10 application
Hiï¼
We hit a bug in our test while run PCMark 10 in a windows 7 VM,
The VM got stuck and the wallclock was hang after several minutes running
PCMark 10 in it.
It is quite easily to reproduce the bug with the upstream KVM and Qemu.
We found that KVM can not inject any RTC irq to VM after it was hang, it fails
to
Deliver irq in ioapic_set_irq() because RTC irq is still pending in ioapic->irr.
static int ioapic_set_irq(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic, unsigned int irq,
int irq_level, bool line_status)
{
⦠â¦
if (!irq_level) {
ioapic->irr &= ~mask;
ret = 1;
goto out;
}
⦠â¦
if ((edge && old_irr == ioapic->irr) ||
(!edge && entry.fields.remote_irr)) {
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
According to RTC spec, after RTC injects a High level irq, OS will read CMOSâs
register C to to clear the irq flag, and pull down the irq electric pin.
For Qemu, we will emulate the reading operation in cmos_ioport_read(),
but Guest OS will fire a write operation before to tell which register will be
read
after this write, where we use s->cmos_index to record the following register
to read.
But in our test, we found that there is a possible situation that Vcpu fails to
read
RTC_REG_C to clear irq, This could happens while two VCpus are writing/reading
registers at the same time, for example, vcpu 0 is trying to read RTC_REG_C,
so it write RTC_REG_C first, where the s->cmos_index will be RTC_REG_C,
but before it tries to read register C, another vcpu1 is going to read RTC_YEAR,
it changes s->cmos_index to RTC_YEAR by a writing action.
The next operation of vcpu0 will be lead to read RTC_YEAR, In this case, we
will miss
calling qemu_irq_lower(s->irq) to clear the irq. After this, kvm will never
inject RTC irq,
and Windows VM will hang.
static void cmos_ioport_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
uint64_t data, unsigned size)
{
RTCState *s = opaque;
if ((addr & 1) == 0) {
s->cmos_index = data & 0x7f;
}
â¦â¦
static uint64_t cmos_ioport_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
unsigned size)
{
RTCState *s = opaque;
int ret;
if ((addr & 1) == 0) {
return 0xff;
} else {
switch(s->cmos_index) {
According to CMOS spec, âany write to PROT 0070h should be followed by an
action to PROT 0071h or the RTC
Will be RTC will be left in an unknown stateâ, but it seems that we can not
ensure this sequence in qemu/kvm.
Any ideas ?
Thanks,
Hailiang
Pls see the trace of kvm_pio:
CPU 1/KVM-15567 [003] .... 209311.762579: kvm_pio: pio_read at 0x70 size
1 count 1 val 0xff
CPU 1/KVM-15567 [003] .... 209311.762582: kvm_pio: pio_write at 0x70
size 1 count 1 val 0x89
CPU 1/KVM-15567 [003] .... 209311.762590: kvm_pio: pio_read at 0x71 size
1 count 1 val 0x17
CPU 0/KVM-15566 [005] .... 209311.762611: kvm_pio: pio_write at 0x70
size 1 count 1 val 0xc
CPU 1/KVM-15567 [003] .... 209311.762615: kvm_pio: pio_read at 0x70 size
1 count 1 val 0xff
CPU 1/KVM-15567 [003] .... 209311.762619: kvm_pio: pio_write at 0x70
size 1 count 1 val 0x88
CPU 1/KVM-15567 [003] .... 209311.762627: kvm_pio: pio_read at 0x71 size
1 count 1 val 0x12
CPU 0/KVM-15566 [005] .... 209311.762632: kvm_pio: pio_read at 0x71 size
1 count 1 val 0x12
CPU 1/KVM-15567 [003] .... 209311.762633: kvm_pio: pio_read at 0x70 size
1 count 1 val 0xff
CPU 0/KVM-15566 [005] .... 209311.762634: kvm_pio: pio_write at 0x70
size 1 count 1 val 0xc <--- Firstly write to 0x70, cmo_index = 0xc &
0x7f = 0xc
CPU 1/KVM-15567 [003] .... 209311.762636: kvm_pio: pio_write at 0x70
size 1 count 1 val 0x86 <-- Secondly write to 0x70, cmo_index = 0x86 &
0x7f = 0x6, cover the cmo_index result of first time
CPU 0/KVM-15566 [005] .... 209311.762641: kvm_pio: pio_read at 0x71 size
1 count 1 val 0x6 <-- vcpu0 read 0x6 because cmo_index is 0x6 now
CPU 1/KVM-15567 [003] .... 209311.762644: kvm_pio: pio_read at 0x71 size
1 count 1 val 0x6 <- vcpu1 read 0x6
CPU 1/KVM-15567 [003] .... 209311.762649: kvm_pio: pio_read at 0x70 size
1 count 1 val 0xff
CPU 1/KVM-15567 [003] .... 209311.762669: kvm_pio: pio_write at 0x70
size 1 count 1 val 0x87
CPU 1/KVM-15567 [003] .... 209311.762678: kvm_pio: pio_read at 0x71 size
1 count 1 val 0x1
CPU 1/KVM-15567 [003] .... 209311.762683: kvm_pio: pio_read at 0x70 size
1 count 1 val 0xff
CPU 1/KVM-15567 [003] .... 209311.762686: kvm_pio: pio_write at 0x70
size 1 count 1 val 0x84
CPU 1/KVM-15567 [003] .... 209311.762693: kvm_pio: pio_read at 0x71 size
1 count 1 val 0x10
CPU 1/KVM-15567 [003] .... 209311.762699: kvm_pio: pio_read at 0x70 size
1 count 1 val 0xff
CPU 1/KVM-15567 [003] .... 209311.762702: kvm_pio: pio_write at 0x70
size 1 count 1 val 0x82
CPU 1/KVM-15567 [003] .... 209311.762709: kvm_pio: pio_read at 0x71 size
1 count 1 val 0x25
CPU 1/KVM-15567 [003] .... 209311.762714: kvm_pio: pio_read at 0x70 size
1 count 1 val 0xff
CPU 1/KVM-15567 [003] .... 209311.762717: kvm_pio: pio_write at 0x70
size 1 count 1 val 0x80
Regards,
-Gonglei
From: Zhanghailiang
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2017 3:03 AM
To: address@hidden; address@hidden; Paolo Bonzini
Cc: Huangweidong (C); Gonglei (Arei); wangxin (U); Xiexiangyou
Subject: [BUG] Windows 7 got stuck easily while run PCMark10 application
Hiï¼
We hit a bug in our test while run PCMark 10 in a windows 7 VM,
The VM got stuck and the wallclock was hang after several minutes running
PCMark 10 in it.
It is quite easily to reproduce the bug with the upstream KVM and Qemu.
We found that KVM can not inject any RTC irq to VM after it was hang, it fails
to
Deliver irq in ioapic_set_irq() because RTC irq is still pending in ioapic->irr.
static int ioapic_set_irq(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic, unsigned int irq,
int irq_level, bool line_status)
{
⦠â¦
if (!irq_level) {
ioapic->irr &= ~mask;
ret = 1;
goto out;
}
⦠â¦
if ((edge && old_irr == ioapic->irr) ||
(!edge && entry.fields.remote_irr)) {
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
According to RTC spec, after RTC injects a High level irq, OS will read CMOSâs
register C to to clear the irq flag, and pull down the irq electric pin.
For Qemu, we will emulate the reading operation in cmos_ioport_read(),
but Guest OS will fire a write operation before to tell which register will be
read
after this write, where we use s->cmos_index to record the following register
to read.
But in our test, we found that there is a possible situation that Vcpu fails to
read
RTC_REG_C to clear irq, This could happens while two VCpus are writing/reading
registers at the same time, for example, vcpu 0 is trying to read RTC_REG_C,
so it write RTC_REG_C first, where the s->cmos_index will be RTC_REG_C,
but before it tries to read register C, another vcpu1 is going to read RTC_YEAR,
it changes s->cmos_index to RTC_YEAR by a writing action.
The next operation of vcpu0 will be lead to read RTC_YEAR, In this case, we
will miss
calling qemu_irq_lower(s->irq) to clear the irq. After this, kvm will never
inject RTC irq,
and Windows VM will hang.
static void cmos_ioport_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
uint64_t data, unsigned size)
{
RTCState *s = opaque;
if ((addr & 1) == 0) {
s->cmos_index = data & 0x7f;
}
â¦â¦
static uint64_t cmos_ioport_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
unsigned size)
{
RTCState *s = opaque;
int ret;
if ((addr & 1) == 0) {
return 0xff;
} else {
switch(s->cmos_index) {
According to CMOS spec, âany write to PROT 0070h should be followed by an
action to PROT 0071h or the RTC
Will be RTC will be left in an unknown stateâ, but it seems that we can not
ensure this sequence in qemu/kvm.
Any ideas ?
Thanks,
Hailiang
On 01/12/2017 08:08, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
>
First write to 0x70, cmos_index = 0xc & 0x7f = 0xc
>
      CPU 0/KVM-15566 kvm_pio: pio_write at 0x70 size 1 count 1 val 0xc>
>
Second write to 0x70, cmos_index = 0x86 & 0x7f = 0x6> Â Â Â Â Â Â CPU 1/KVM-15567
>
kvm_pio: pio_write at 0x70 size 1 count 1 val 0x86> vcpu0 read 0x6 because
>
cmos_index is 0x6 now:> Â Â Â Â Â Â CPU 0/KVM-15566 kvm_pio: pio_read at 0x71 size
>
1 count 1 val 0x6> vcpu1 read 0x6:> Â Â Â Â Â Â CPU 1/KVM-15567 kvm_pio: pio_read
>
at 0x71 size 1 count 1 val 0x6
This seems to be a Windows bug. The easiest workaround that I
can think of is to clear the interrupts already when 0xc is written,
without waiting for the read (because REG_C can only be read).
What do you think?
Thanks,
Paolo
I also think it's windows bug, the problem is that it doesn't occur on xen
platform. And there are some other works need to be done while reading REG_C.
So I wrote that patch.
Thanks,
Gonglei
å件人ï¼Paolo Bonzini
æ¶ä»¶äººï¼é¾ç£,å¼ æµ·äº®,qemu-devel,Michael S. Tsirkin
æéï¼é»ä¼æ ,çæ¬£,谢祥æ
æ¶é´ï¼2017-12-02 01:10:08
主é¢:Re: [BUG] Windows 7 got stuck easily while run PCMark10 application
On 01/12/2017 08:08, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
>
First write to 0x70, cmos_index = 0xc & 0x7f = 0xc
>
CPU 0/KVM-15566 kvm_pio: pio_write at 0x70 size 1 count 1 val 0xc>
>
Second write to 0x70, cmos_index = 0x86 & 0x7f = 0x6> CPU 1/KVM-15567
>
kvm_pio: pio_write at 0x70 size 1 count 1 val 0x86> vcpu0 read 0x6 because
>
cmos_index is 0x6 now:> CPU 0/KVM-15566 kvm_pio: pio_read at 0x71 size
>
1 count 1 val 0x6> vcpu1 read 0x6:> CPU 1/KVM-15567 kvm_pio: pio_read
>
at 0x71 size 1 count 1 val 0x6
This seems to be a Windows bug. The easiest workaround that I
can think of is to clear the interrupts already when 0xc is written,
without waiting for the read (because REG_C can only be read).
What do you think?
Thanks,
Paolo
On 01/12/2017 18:45, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
>
I also think it's windows bug, the problem is that it doesn't occur on
>
xen platform.
It's a race, it may just be that RTC PIO is faster in Xen because it's
implemented in the hypervisor.
I will try reporting it to Microsoft.
Thanks,
Paolo
>
Thanks,
>
Gonglei
>
*å件人ï¼*Paolo Bonzini
>
*æ¶ä»¶äººï¼*é¾ç£,å¼ æµ·äº®,qemu-devel,Michael S. Tsirkin
>
*æéï¼*é»ä¼æ ,çæ¬£,谢祥æ
>
*æ¶é´ï¼*2017-12-02 01:10:08
>
*主é¢:*Re: [BUG] Windows 7 got stuck easily while run PCMark10 application
>
>
On 01/12/2017 08:08, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
>
> First write to 0x70, cmos_index = 0xc & 0x7f = 0xc
>
> Â Â Â Â Â Â CPU 0/KVM-15566 kvm_pio: pio_write at 0x70 size 1 count 1 val 0xc>
>
> Second write to 0x70, cmos_index = 0x86 & 0x7f = 0x6> Â Â Â Â Â Â CPU 1/KVM-15567
>
> kvm_pio: pio_write at 0x70 size 1 count 1 val 0x86> vcpu0 read 0x6 because
>
> cmos_index is 0x6 now:> Â Â Â Â Â Â CPU 0/KVM-15566 kvm_pio: pio_read at 0x71
>
> size 1 count 1 val 0x6> vcpu1
>
read 0x6:> Â Â Â Â Â Â CPU 1/KVM-15567 kvm_pio: pio_read at 0x71 size 1 count
>
1 val 0x6
>
This seems to be a Windows bug. The easiest workaround that I
>
can think of is to clear the interrupts already when 0xc is written,
>
without waiting for the read (because REG_C can only be read).
>
>
What do you think?
>
>
Thanks,
>
>
Paolo
On 2017/12/2 2:37, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 01/12/2017 18:45, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
I also think it's windows bug, the problem is that it doesn't occur on
xen platform.
It's a race, it may just be that RTC PIO is faster in Xen because it's
implemented in the hypervisor.
No, In Xen, it does not has such problem because it injects the RTC irq without
checking whether its previous irq been cleared or not, which we do has such
checking
in KVM.
static int ioapic_set_irq(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic, unsigned int irq,
int irq_level, bool line_status)
{
... ...
if (!irq_level) {
ioapic->irr &= ~mask; -->clear the RTC irq in irr, Or we will can not
inject RTC irq.
ret = 1;
goto out;
}
I agree that we move the operation of clearing RTC irq from cmos_ioport_read()
to
cmos_ioport_write() to ensure the action been done.
Thanks,
Hailiang
I will try reporting it to Microsoft.
Thanks,
Paolo
Thanks,
Gonglei
*å件人ï¼*Paolo Bonzini
*æ¶ä»¶äººï¼*é¾ç£,å¼ æµ·äº®,qemu-devel,Michael S. Tsirkin
*æéï¼*é»ä¼æ ,çæ¬£,谢祥æ
*æ¶é´ï¼*2017-12-02 01:10:08
*主é¢:*Re: [BUG] Windows 7 got stuck easily while run PCMark10 application
On 01/12/2017 08:08, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
First write to 0x70, cmos_index = 0xc & 0x7f = 0xc
CPU 0/KVM-15566 kvm_pio: pio_write at 0x70 size 1 count 1 val 0xc> Second write to
0x70, cmos_index = 0x86 & 0x7f = 0x6> CPU 1/KVM-15567 kvm_pio: pio_write at 0x70
size 1 count 1 val 0x86> vcpu0 read 0x6 because cmos_index is 0x6 now:> CPU
0/KVM-15566 kvm_pio: pio_read at 0x71 size 1 count 1 val 0x6> vcpu1
read 0x6:> CPU 1/KVM-15567 kvm_pio: pio_read at 0x71 size 1 count
1 val 0x6
This seems to be a Windows bug. The easiest workaround that I
can think of is to clear the interrupts already when 0xc is written,
without waiting for the read (because REG_C can only be read).
What do you think?
Thanks,
Paolo
.
|