1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
|
<think>
Okay, I need to classify this bug report: "atomic failure linking with --enable-sanitizers on 32-bit Linux hosts". The categories available are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
First, let's break down the bug report. It mentions "atomic failure linking" which suggests a problem during the linking stage of compilation. The issue occurs when using --enable-sanitizers on 32-bit Linux systems.
Atomic operations are typically handled at a low level, possibly involving assembly or specific compiler optimizations. Sanitizers (like AddressSanitizer) can sometimes cause issues with such low-level code because they add additional checks which might interfere with how the program is linked or runs.
Looking at the categories: 'assembly' seems relevant here because it's about linking and possibly incorrect assembly instructions. However, if the problem isn't in the translation but rather in the build process, maybe it's a performance issue? But I'm not sure.
Wait, --enable-sanitizers might affect how libraries or object files are linked. If the linker is failing to link correctly when sanitizers are enabled on 32-bit systems, this could be related to the way QEMU handles certain optimizations or code paths that differ between 64-bit and 32-bit builds.
Considering all options, 'assembly' seems more fitting because it's about linking with specific flags that might change how assembly is handled during compilation. Alternatively, if it's a build-time issue, maybe 'other', but I think the link to assembly operations makes 'assembly' a better fit.
</think>
assembly
|