1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
|
<think>
Alright, let's try to figure out how to classify this bug report about supporting LoongArch architecture in QEMU. First, I need to understand what each category means.
The user provided several categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
Looking at the bug report, it mentions adding support for LoongArch architecture. Since QEMU is a hypervisor and emulator, supporting a new architecture would likely involve changes in the hypervisor layer or possibly device emulation. But LoongArch is a CPU architecture, so maybe it's more about the instruction translation or the virtualization aspect.
Wait, but the categories don't have 'architecture' as an option. The closest might be 'hypervisor' since adding support for a new architecture in QEMU would involve modifying how the hypervisor handles that architecture. Alternatively, if it's related to device drivers or peripherals, maybe under 'peripherals', but I think hypervisor is more appropriate because it's about the emulation and virtualization of the CPU instruction set.
I'm not entirely sure, but considering QEMU's structure, adding a new architecture support would primarily affect the hypervisor's translation layers. So, I'd say the category is 'hypervisor'.
</think>
hypervisor
|