summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/771
blob: 76e4f2da036244f082c0d4026a6d7999174bbead (plain) (blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
<think>
Okay, let's tackle this bug report classification. The issue is about QEMU where after rebooting Windows 98, the guest OS freezes because no interrupts are delivered. So, I need to figure out which category this falls into from the given options.

First, the categories listed include things like mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, network, KVM, etc. The problem here is related to hardware interrupts not being delivered after a reboot. That suggests something's wrong with how QEMU handles interrupt delivery during the reboot process.

Since it's about hardware-level interruptions, I'm thinking this isn't an issue with user-mode or assembly translation (mistranslation or assembly lowering). It also doesn't seem like a problem with graphics, sockets, or network because those aren't mentioned. The freezing occurs after a hard reset, so maybe it's related to how the hypervisor handles reboots.

Looking at the categories, "hypervisor" makes sense here. QEMU acts as a hypervisor when running guest OSes. If it fails to properly manage hardware interrupts post-reboot, that points to a hypervisor-level issue. Other possibilities like device or kernel could be considered, but since it's about interrupt delivery which is fundamental to the system's operation, hypervisor seems more accurate.

So, putting it all together, the bug relates to how QEMU (the hypervisor) handles interrupt delivery after rebooting the guest OS. Therefore, the category should be "hypervisor."
</think>

hypervisor