summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/manual-review/1445
blob: 4302f0eb2b4d958a8ddf72ece80765a90e02e340 (plain) (blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
<think>

</think>

The provided log indicates a crash in the QEMU emulator due to a negative size parameter being passed to `memcpy`, which is detected by AddressSanitizer (ASan). This suggests there's a bug in the code that calls `memcpy` with an invalid size argument. The stack trace shows where this issue occurs, starting from `LLVMFuzzerInitialize` in `videzzo_qemu.c` and propagating through various QEMU initialization functions.

### Key Points:
1. **Crash Cause**: A negative size parameter is passed to `memcpy`, which is invalid and causes the program to abort.
2. **Location**: The issue occurs in `asan_interceptors_memintrinsics.cpp` at line 22, which intercepts memory operations for ASan.
3. **Stack Trace**:
   - The crash originates from `LLVMFuzzerInitialize`.
   - It propagates through QEMU's initialization functions (`qemu_init`, `machine_run_board_init`, etc.).
   - The root cause likely lies in the hardware device initialization (`tosa_init`, `tc6393xb_init`, `nand_init`), where a negative size is being passed to `memcpy`.

### Steps to Investigate:
1. **Review Fuzzer Input**:
   - Check the input provided to the fuzzer to ensure it's valid and doesn't trigger invalid memory operations.
2. **Inspect QEMU Initialization**:
   - Look at the functions in `tosa_init`, `tc6393xb_init`, and `nand_init` to identify where an invalid size might be calculated or passed.
3. **Check Memory Operations**:
   - Ensure all calls to `memcpy` (or similar functions) have valid, non-negative size parameters.
4. **Debug with ASan**:
   - Use ASan's features to track memory allocations and detect the exact point where the invalid size is used.

### Conclusion:
The crash indicates a bug in QEMU's initialization process when using the fuzzer. The negative size parameter passed to `memcpy` suggests an issue in how memory operations are handled during device initialization. Investigating the functions in `tosa_init`, `tc6393xb_init`, and `nand_init` will help identify the root cause of this bug.