1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
|
<think>
Okay, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through it carefully.
The user reports that version 2.8.0 won't compile if the g++ compiler doesn't recognize the "-fstack-protector-strong" option. They gave an example where Ubuntu Trusty (14.04) uses g++ 4.8.5 and gets a syntax error, whereas in Ubuntu Xenial (16.04), with g++ 5.4.0, it compiles fine.
First, I should think about what each category means. The categories provided are:
- mistranslation
- assembly
- other
- device
- graphic
- socket
- network
- KVM
- boot
- vnc
- debug
- files
- permissions
- performance
- kernel
- peripherals
- hypervisor
Looking at the bug, it's related to compilation. The issue arises because a specific compiler option isn't recognized by an older version of g++. This is causing QEMU not to compile correctly on some systems.
The problem doesn't seem to be with how code is translated (mistranslation) or assembly lowering (assembly category). It's more about the build process and compatibility with different compilers.
Other possibilities like device, graphic, network, etc., don't fit here because they relate to functionalities rather than compilation issues. Similarly, kernel, hypervisor, and others are not related.
The issue is specifically about compiler flags and version compatibility. Since "-fstack-protector-strong" was introduced in a later g++ version (I think it's part of newer C++ standards support), older versions don't recognize it. This causes build failures on systems using older compilers.
Therefore, this doesn't fit into any specific category like performance or permissions; it's more about the build process and compiler support. The categories provided might not have a perfect fit, but "other" seems appropriate because it's a general compilation issue that isn't covered by other specific categories.
Wait, another thought: sometimes build issues fall under "mistranslation" if they relate to how code is translated into IR or target code. But in this case, the problem is with a compiler flag not being recognized, which is more about the build system's configuration rather than translation semantics. So maybe it's better categorized as "other."
Yes, I think "other" is the most accurate category here because it's a general issue related to compiling QEMU and isn't tied to any specific component or feature within QEMU itself.
</think>
The bug report is about a compilation error due to an unrecognized compiler flag in older versions of g++. This doesn't fit into categories like mistranslation, assembly, or others related to functionality. It's more about build compatibility.
**other**
|