restructure results

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 85 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/108/semantic/754635 b/results/classifier/108/semantic/754635
deleted file mode 100644
index df155efc..00000000
--- a/results/classifier/108/semantic/754635
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,85 +0,0 @@
-semantic: 0.926
-graphic: 0.919
-device: 0.919
-debug: 0.918
-other: 0.907
-socket: 0.876
-PID: 0.873
-performance: 0.854
-permissions: 0.821
-files: 0.817
-network: 0.802
-boot: 0.750
-KVM: 0.737
-vnc: 0.726
-
--d option outs wrong info about sections
-
-For example, after run ./qemu-i386 -d in_asm /bin/ls from 0.14.0 release, I received this qemu.log file:
-$ cat /tmp/qemu.log | grep -A7 guest
-Relocating guest address space from 0x08048000 to 0x8048000
-guest_base  0x0
-start    end      size     prot
-00048000-0005f000 00017000 r-x
-0005f000-00069000 0000a000 rw-
-00040000-00041000 00001000 ---
-00041000-00041800 00000800 rw-
-00041800-0005d800 0001c000 r-x
-0005d800-0005f800 00002000 rw-
-
-But such command in 0.12.5 release outs this:
-$ cat /tmp/qemu.log | grep -A7 guest
-guest_base  0x0
-start    end      size     prot
-00f38000-00f39000 00001000 ---
-08048000-0805f000 00017000 r-x
-0805f000-08061000 00002000 rw-
-40000000-40080000 00080000 rw-
-40080000-40081000 00001000 ---
-40081000-4009d000 0001c000 r-x
-
-It looks correct.
-I received such differences and with qemu-microblaze. 
-
-After comparing 0.12.5 and 0.14.0 releases I found this differences in exec.c:
-in 0.12.5:
-end = (i << (32 - L1_BITS)) | (j << TARGET_PAGE_BITS);
-
-in 0.14.0:
-int rc = walk_memory_regions_1(&data, (abi_ulong)i << V_L1_SHIFT,
-
-V_L1_SHIFT in my case is 10, but 32 - L1_BITS is 22
-
-I make this changes:
-$ diff -up qemu-0.14.0/exec.c exec.c
---- qemu-0.14.0/exec.c	2011-04-08 17:26:00.524464002 +0400
-+++ exec.c	2011-04-08 17:26:09.800464003 +0400
-@@ -2340,7 +2340,7 @@ int walk_memory_regions(void *priv, walk
-     data.prot = 0;
- 
-     for (i = 0; i < V_L1_SIZE; i++) {
--        int rc = walk_memory_regions_1(&data, (abi_ulong)i << V_L1_SHIFT,
-+        int rc = walk_memory_regions_1(&data, (abi_ulong)i << (V_L1_SHIFT + TARGET_PAGE_BITS),
-                                        V_L1_SHIFT / L2_BITS - 1, l1_map + i);
-         if (rc != 0) {
-             return rc;
-
-After this outputs looks correct. 
-
-I don't know code base good, and think what may to do more general corrections.
-Host system: linux i386
-
-Hi,
-
-Thanks for reporting this issue, and the investigation. I don't really understand the rationale for the change, so I can't help much.
-
-This change appears to be from 5cd2c5b6ad75c46d40118ac67c0c09d4e7930a65. I think input from Richard Henderson (the author of the change) would be very useful.
-
-Brad
-
-
-Looking through old bug tickets... is this still an issue with the latest version of QEMU? Or could we close this ticket nowadays?
-
-
-[Expired for QEMU because there has been no activity for 60 days.]
-