add 18th iteration of classifier

1 files changed, 82 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/118/semantic-x86/1374 b/results/classifier/118/semantic-x86/1374
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..a4f36447
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/118/semantic-x86/1374
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+x86: 0.997
+semantic: 0.993
+graphic: 0.807
+architecture: 0.761
+register: 0.732
+device: 0.700
+assembly: 0.661
+ppc: 0.428
+arm: 0.388
+boot: 0.382
+vnc: 0.341
+debug: 0.324
+socket: 0.314
+kernel: 0.307
+network: 0.272
+mistranslation: 0.272
+permissions: 0.246
+risc-v: 0.238
+peripherals: 0.199
+i386: 0.198
+performance: 0.192
+PID: 0.155
+files: 0.078
+virtual: 0.061
+VMM: 0.045
+KVM: 0.044
+TCG: 0.038
+user-level: 0.022
+hypervisor: 0.019
+--------------------
+x86: 1.000
+i386: 0.993
+semantic: 0.988
+assembly: 0.970
+debug: 0.228
+register: 0.206
+kernel: 0.077
+files: 0.043
+performance: 0.042
+TCG: 0.033
+user-level: 0.031
+virtual: 0.025
+architecture: 0.018
+hypervisor: 0.013
+peripherals: 0.012
+device: 0.012
+PID: 0.011
+VMM: 0.008
+network: 0.007
+boot: 0.006
+risc-v: 0.005
+socket: 0.005
+permissions: 0.005
+KVM: 0.005
+graphic: 0.003
+vnc: 0.001
+ppc: 0.001
+mistranslation: 0.001
+arm: 0.000
+
+x86 BZHI semantic bug
+Description of problem:
+The result of instruction BZHI is different from the CPU. The value of destination register and SF of EFLAGS are different.
+Steps to reproduce:
+1. Compile this code
+```
+void main() {
+    asm("mov rax, 0xb1aa9da2fe33fe3");
+    asm("mov rbx, 0x80000000ffffffff");
+    asm("mov rcx, 0xf3fce8829b99a5c6");
+    asm("bzhi rax, rbx, rcx");
+}
+```
+2. Execute and compare the result with the CPU.
+    - CPU
+        - RAX = 0x0x80000000ffffffff
+        - SF = 1
+    - QEMU
+        - RAX = 0xffffffff
+        - SF = 0
+Additional information:
+This bug is discovered by research conducted by KAIST SoftSec.