restructure results

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 16 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/kernel/1679358 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/kernel/1679358
deleted file mode 100644
index 9ca71852..00000000
--- a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/kernel/1679358
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,16 +0,0 @@
-<think>
-Okay, I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let's look at the details.
-
-The user mentioned that certain fields in the SCTLR (System Control Register) are read-only or have specific access conditions, like being accessible only in secure mode. They pointed out that QEMU currently allows writes to these fields, which caused issues with a bootloader they're debugging.
-
-Looking at the categories: mistranslation is about incorrect semantic mapping, but this seems more related to register handling. The report isn't about assembly lowering or other specific areas like graphics or networking. It's about how QEMU handles certain CPU registers incorrectly, specifically not enforcing their read-only nature.
-
-Since it's related to system control registers and proper access rights, the closest category is 'kernel' because it involves low-level OS or hypervisor-related functionality. Alternatively, 'peripherals' might fit as it relates to hardware register handling, but considering it's about CPU-specific registers, 'kernel' seems more appropriate.
-</think>
-
-The bug report discusses issues with specific fields in the SCTLR register not being handled correctly by QEMU. These fields are supposed to be read-only or accessible only under certain conditions, like secure mode. The problem is that QEMU allows writes to these fields, causing issues in a bootloader.
-
-Looking at the categories, this issue is related to how the hypervisor (QEMU) handles CPU registers and their access permissions. This falls under 'kernel' as it pertains to system-level operations and proper register handling.
-
-**Answer:**
-kernel
\ No newline at end of file