summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/assembly/1631625
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChristian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com>2025-06-30 12:34:26 +0000
committerChristian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com>2025-06-30 12:35:44 +0000
commit25f8033d556aa17afaea4a5196ea7a69fe248320 (patch)
tree0f056db167683be54ea1e5e72d29d6069af55e7d /results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/assembly/1631625
parent8e6da29e4ee5fc14bc1cc816a24f21271f14090d (diff)
downloademulator-bug-study-25f8033d556aa17afaea4a5196ea7a69fe248320.tar.gz
emulator-bug-study-25f8033d556aa17afaea4a5196ea7a69fe248320.zip
add new temporary deepseek-r1:14b results
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/assembly/1631625')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/assembly/163162515
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/assembly/1631625 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/assembly/1631625
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..c27cd5f0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/assembly/1631625
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me start by reading through the information provided carefully.
+
+The bug is in target-mips/dsp_helper.c at lines 3480 and 3509. The error messages are about bit shifting concerns. Specifically, the code uses '0x01 << (size + 1)', and there's a suggestion to change it to '0x01UL' to avoid issues when size is >=32. 
+
+Looking at the categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug seems related to bit operations in code, which falls under assembly lowering since it's dealing with how variables are handled at a low level. Alternatively, it could be a portability or optimization issue, which might relate to the 'other' category if it doesn't fit more specific ones. However, since it's about handling shifts correctly and preventing overflow by using the correct type (UL for unsigned long), this is likely an assembly-level concern.
+
+So, I think the best category here is 'assembly'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report discusses issues with bit shifting in C code, specifically suggesting a change to use 0x01UL instead of 0x01. This relates to how values are handled at a low level, which is part of assembly lowering.
+
+**Answer:** assembly
\ No newline at end of file