add deepseek and gemma results

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 23 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/1018 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/1018
deleted file mode 100644
index 13cfeef0..00000000
--- a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/1018
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,23 +0,0 @@
-<think>
-Alright, I'm looking at this bug report about QEMU. The user mentioned that when they use `virtio-scsi-pci` with an `iothread`, the host CPU usage goes up to 100%. Without the `iothread`, it's normal. This doesn't happen in QEMU 6.2.0 but does in 7.0.0.
-
-First, I need to classify this bug into one of the given categories. Let me go through each category:
-
-- **mistranslation**: Probably not related since it's about performance with specific hardware.
-- **assembly**: Unlikely, as it's a device issue.
-- **device**: This could be relevant because `virtio-scsi-pci` is a device.
-- **graphic**, **socket**, **network**: Doesn't seem to fit.
-- **KVM**, **boot**, **vnc**, **debug**, **files**, **permissions**, **performance**, **kernel**, **peripherals**, **hypervisor**: These are all possibilities, but let's think deeper.
-
-The issue is with `virtio-scsi-pci` and `iothread`, leading to high CPU usage. Since `iothread` relates to I/O operations handled by separate threads, the problem might be in how QEMU handles I/O when using this option. High CPU suggests a performance issue, but since it's specific to the device configuration, maybe it's more about the device handling.
-
-Wait, "performance" is one of the categories, but the bug is tied directly to the virtio-scsi-pci device and iothread usage. So perhaps it falls under "device". Alternatively, if it's causing high CPU due to a loop or incorrect resource management in QEMU's code when using `iothread` with this device, maybe "performance" isn't specific enough.
-
-Looking at other categories: "hypervisor" could be relevant since QEMU acts as a hypervisor for KVM. But the issue is more about the device and I/O handling. Therefore, "device" seems appropriate because it's related to how the virtio-scsi-pci device interacts with the host system when using an iothread.
-
-I think the bug is best categorized under "device" since it's specific to that component's interaction leading to performance issues.
-</think>
-
-The issue relates directly to the `virtio-scsi-pci` device and its interaction with I/O threads, which falls under device-specific behavior. 
-
-Answer: device
\ No newline at end of file