add new temporary deepseek-r1:14b results

1 files changed, 23 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/1292037 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/1292037
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..f4a1a162
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/1292037
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug report mentions that a Solaris 10 x86 guest is crashing QEMU when using the -icount 1 option. The commit provided is f53f3d0a00b6df39ce8dfca942608e5b6a9a4f71, and the host is Ubuntu with an Intel Xeon E5649 processor.
+
+Looking at the error message: "qemu: Fatal: Raised interrupt while not in I/O function." This suggests that QEMU raised an interrupt but wasn't expecting it because it's not handling I/O operations. So, perhaps there's an issue related to how interrupts are handled or scheduled.
+
+The command used includes -icount 1, which enables the instruction count limit feature, but with a value of 1, meaning each CPU instruction is emulated step by step rather than in bulk. This could affect performance and timing of the emulation, possibly leading to issues if not handled correctly.
+
+Now, considering the categories: Mistranslation would be about incorrect mappings from source to target architecture, which doesn't seem directly related here. The error isn't about assembly lowering either. It's more about handling interrupts, so maybe device-related? Because devices often involve interrupt handling in QEMU.
+
+Alternatively, since it's a Solaris guest and the crash happens during emulation with -icount 1, it could be an issue with how the hypervisor (QEMU) handles certain operations when under heavy or specific conditions like single-step mode. Alternatively, it might relate to the kernel part of QEMU, but I'm not sure.
+
+Wait, considering that "Raised interrupt while not in I/O function" suggests it's during normal execution, not during an I/O operation. So perhaps the problem is related to how the hypervisor schedules or handles CPU operations and interrupts.
+
+In QEMU, devices can generate interrupts which are handled by the host's kernel or the device emulation. If the interrupt is raised when not in I/O function, it might be a timing issue or a missing synchronization point. Maybe the bug lies in how the device (like a virtual device) is handling these interrupts under single-step conditions.
+
+So considering all this, I think the category should be 'device' because it's about handling interrupts from devices within QEMU's emulation.
+</think>
+
+The crash occurs due to an unexpected interrupt during non-I/O operations when using -icount 1. This likely relates to device handling in QEMU, particularly with how virtual devices manage interrupts under single-step conditions.
+
+Answer: device
\ No newline at end of file